Health performance assessment modeling and its application to compact medical communities in China

Miao Yu, Zhongmou Huang, Dan Zhang, Yansui Yang, Ching-Wen Chien, Hongwu Tuo
{"title":"Health performance assessment modeling and its application to compact medical communities in China","authors":"Miao Yu,&nbsp;Zhongmou Huang,&nbsp;Dan Zhang,&nbsp;Yansui Yang,&nbsp;Ching-Wen Chien,&nbsp;Hongwu Tuo","doi":"10.1002/hcs2.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Some regions in China have already implemented capitation payment or capitation budget management for medical insurance funds. However, there remains a shortage of adequate tools and methodologies to accurately quantify differences in population health risks. Therefore, this paper constructs a health performance assessment model that comprises four steps. The first step is to categorize all participants into health risk groups based on whether they have contracted with a family doctor, their age, sex, and the type of consultation. The second step is to categorize health risk groups based on differences in healthcare resource utilization. The third step is to analyze health performance by examining healthcare resource utilization year over year. The fourth step is to apply the assessment results to assist local finance bureaus and medical insurance bureaus in developing incentive schemes. According to cost weights, the health risk groups are split into six classes: insured residents without health care visits, healthy insured person, slightly ill insured patients, ill insured patients, more seriously disease patients, and severely ill insured patients. We evaluate one compact medical community's health performance by examining changes in the proportion of resource usage group size and expense. From 2019 to 2021, both the proportion of patients with severe and ultra-severe diseases and the proportion of costs in the sample increased, according to changes in resource utilization levels. This result indicates that the population's overall health has not improved and that the compact medical community is still primarily focused on treating diseases, with poor implementation of health maintenance measures and minimal improvement in health performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":100601,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Science","volume":"3 4","pages":"232-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hcs2.105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hcs2.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some regions in China have already implemented capitation payment or capitation budget management for medical insurance funds. However, there remains a shortage of adequate tools and methodologies to accurately quantify differences in population health risks. Therefore, this paper constructs a health performance assessment model that comprises four steps. The first step is to categorize all participants into health risk groups based on whether they have contracted with a family doctor, their age, sex, and the type of consultation. The second step is to categorize health risk groups based on differences in healthcare resource utilization. The third step is to analyze health performance by examining healthcare resource utilization year over year. The fourth step is to apply the assessment results to assist local finance bureaus and medical insurance bureaus in developing incentive schemes. According to cost weights, the health risk groups are split into six classes: insured residents without health care visits, healthy insured person, slightly ill insured patients, ill insured patients, more seriously disease patients, and severely ill insured patients. We evaluate one compact medical community's health performance by examining changes in the proportion of resource usage group size and expense. From 2019 to 2021, both the proportion of patients with severe and ultra-severe diseases and the proportion of costs in the sample increased, according to changes in resource utilization levels. This result indicates that the population's overall health has not improved and that the compact medical community is still primarily focused on treating diseases, with poor implementation of health maintenance measures and minimal improvement in health performance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康绩效评估模型及其在中国紧密型医疗社区中的应用
我国部分地区已对医保基金实行按人头付费或按人头预算管理。然而,目前仍缺乏足够的工具和方法来准确量化人群健康风险的差异。因此,本文构建了一个包括四个步骤的健康绩效评估模型。第一步是根据参保人是否与家庭医生签约、年龄、性别和就诊类型,将所有参保人划分为不同的健康风险群体。第二步是根据医疗资源利用率的差异对健康风险组进行分类。第三步是通过逐年检查医疗资源使用情况来分析健康绩效。第四步是应用评估结果,协助地方财政局和医疗保险局制定激励计划。根据费用权重,将健康风险群体划分为六个等级:未就医的参保居民、健康参保人员、轻度疾病参保患者、疾病参保患者、重度疾病参保患者和重症疾病参保患者。我们通过考察资源使用群体规模和支出比例的变化来评估一个紧密型医疗社区的健康绩效。从 2019 年到 2021 年,根据资源使用水平的变化,样本中重症和超重症患者的比例和费用比例均有所上升。这一结果表明,居民的整体健康水平并未得到改善,紧密型医疗共同体仍以治疗疾病为主,健康维护措施落实不力,健康绩效改善甚微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study protocol: A national cross-sectional study on psychology and behavior investigation of Chinese residents in 2023. Caregiving in Asia: Priority areas for research, policy, and practice to support family caregivers. Innovative public strategies in response to COVID-19: A review of practices from China. Sixty years of ethical evolution: The 2024 revision of the Declaration of Helsinki (DoH). A novel ensemble ARIMA-LSTM approach for evaluating COVID-19 cases and future outbreak preparedness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1