Impact of Age on Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%/Adapalene 0.15%/Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1% Gel in Participants with Moderate-to-Severe Acne

L. Kircik, Julie C. Harper, Hilary Baldwin, L. Eichenfield, Emil A. Tanghetti, Emmy Graber, Heather C. Woolery-Lloyd, Z. Draelos
{"title":"Impact of Age on Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%/Adapalene 0.15%/Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1% Gel in Participants with Moderate-to-Severe Acne","authors":"L. Kircik, Julie C. Harper, Hilary Baldwin, L. Eichenfield, Emil A. Tanghetti, Emmy Graber, Heather C. Woolery-Lloyd, Z. Draelos","doi":"10.25251/skin.8.supp.415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Topical clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide 3.1% (CAB) gel is the first fixed-dose, triple-combination formulation approved for the treatment of acne. In three clinical studies of participants with moderate-to-severe acne, CAB gel demonstrated superior efficacy to vehicle and component dyads, with good safety/tolerability. As acne pathogenesis and treatment outcomes can vary with age, this post hoc analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAB in pediatric and adolescent participants (aged 9-24 years) versus adult participants (≥25 years). This age cutoff was chosen as acne in patients aged 18-24 years is more similar to adolescents than adults, and age 25 is often used to define “adult acne”. \nMethods: In a phase 2 (NCT03170388) and two phase 3 (NCT04214652, NCT04214639) studies, participants aged ≥9 years with moderate-to-severe acne were randomized to once-daily CAB or vehicle gel. Endpoints included percentage of participants achieving treatment success (defined as ≥2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator’s Global Severity Score and clear/almost clear skin) and least-squares mean percent change from baseline in inflammatory/noninflammatory lesion counts at week 12. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were also assessed. Pooled data across all three studies were analyzed for participants aged 9-24 years (CAB: n=297; vehicle: n=218) or ≥25 years (n=91; n=51). \nResults: At week 12, approximately half of CAB-treated participants in both age groups achieved treatment success (9-24 years: 50.6%; ≥25: 49.0%) versus less than one-fourth with vehicle (15.7% and 20.6%; P<0.01, both). Treatment with CAB resulted in >70% reductions from baseline in inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions in both age groups, versus 45%-62% with vehicle (P≤0.001, all). There were no significant differences between CAB-treated participants in the two age groups across any of these efficacy endpoints (P=0.68-0.97). Most TEAEs with CAB were of mild-moderate severity, with no age-related trends in safety/tolerability. \nConclusions: Fixed-dose, triple-combination CAB gel was efficacious and well tolerated in participants with moderate-to-severe acne, regardless of age. Approximately half of pediatric/adolescent and adult participants achieved clear/almost clear skin with CAB, and lesion count reductions of >70% were observed. \nFunding: Ortho Dermatologics","PeriodicalId":22013,"journal":{"name":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","volume":"122 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.supp.415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Topical clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide 3.1% (CAB) gel is the first fixed-dose, triple-combination formulation approved for the treatment of acne. In three clinical studies of participants with moderate-to-severe acne, CAB gel demonstrated superior efficacy to vehicle and component dyads, with good safety/tolerability. As acne pathogenesis and treatment outcomes can vary with age, this post hoc analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAB in pediatric and adolescent participants (aged 9-24 years) versus adult participants (≥25 years). This age cutoff was chosen as acne in patients aged 18-24 years is more similar to adolescents than adults, and age 25 is often used to define “adult acne”. Methods: In a phase 2 (NCT03170388) and two phase 3 (NCT04214652, NCT04214639) studies, participants aged ≥9 years with moderate-to-severe acne were randomized to once-daily CAB or vehicle gel. Endpoints included percentage of participants achieving treatment success (defined as ≥2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator’s Global Severity Score and clear/almost clear skin) and least-squares mean percent change from baseline in inflammatory/noninflammatory lesion counts at week 12. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were also assessed. Pooled data across all three studies were analyzed for participants aged 9-24 years (CAB: n=297; vehicle: n=218) or ≥25 years (n=91; n=51). Results: At week 12, approximately half of CAB-treated participants in both age groups achieved treatment success (9-24 years: 50.6%; ≥25: 49.0%) versus less than one-fourth with vehicle (15.7% and 20.6%; P<0.01, both). Treatment with CAB resulted in >70% reductions from baseline in inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions in both age groups, versus 45%-62% with vehicle (P≤0.001, all). There were no significant differences between CAB-treated participants in the two age groups across any of these efficacy endpoints (P=0.68-0.97). Most TEAEs with CAB were of mild-moderate severity, with no age-related trends in safety/tolerability. Conclusions: Fixed-dose, triple-combination CAB gel was efficacious and well tolerated in participants with moderate-to-severe acne, regardless of age. Approximately half of pediatric/adolescent and adult participants achieved clear/almost clear skin with CAB, and lesion count reductions of >70% were observed. Funding: Ortho Dermatologics
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年龄对固定剂量克林霉素磷酸酯 1.2%/阿达帕林 0.15%/过氧化苯甲酰 3.1%凝胶治疗中重度痤疮参与者疗效和安全性的影响
简介外用克林霉素磷酸酯 1.2%/阿达帕林 0.15%/过氧化苯甲酰 3.1%(CAB)凝胶是首个获准用于治疗痤疮的固定剂量三合一配方。在对中度至重度痤疮患者进行的三项临床研究中,CAB凝胶的疗效优于载体和成分组合,而且安全性/耐受性良好。由于痤疮的发病机制和治疗效果会随着年龄的变化而变化,因此进行了这项事后分析,以评估 CAB 在儿童和青少年参与者(9-24 岁)与成人参与者(≥25 岁)中的疗效和安全性。之所以选择这一年龄分界线,是因为 18-24 岁患者的痤疮与青少年比与成人更相似,而 25 岁通常被用来定义 "成人痤疮"。研究方法在一项2期研究(NCT03170388)和两项3期研究(NCT04214652、NCT04214639)中,年龄≥9岁的中重度痤疮患者被随机分配到每日一次的CAB或载体凝胶中。终点包括获得治疗成功的参与者百分比(定义为评价者总体严重程度评分和透明/几乎透明皮肤比基线降低≥2级),以及第12周时炎症/非炎症皮损计数比基线变化的最小二乘平均百分比。此外,还评估了治疗突发不良事件(TEAE)。对所有三项研究中年龄在 9-24 岁(CAB:n=297;药物:n=218)或≥25 岁(n=91;n=51)的参与者的汇总数据进行了分析。研究结果第 12 周时,两个年龄组中约有一半接受过 CAB 治疗的参与者取得了治疗成功(9-24 岁:50.6%;≥25 岁:49.0%),而接受过药物治疗的参与者不到四分之一(两个年龄组的炎症性和非炎症性病变从基线减少了 15.7% 和 20.6%;P70%),而接受过药物治疗的参与者从基线减少了 45%-62% (P≤0.001,全部)。在这些疗效终点中,两个年龄组的 CAB 治疗参与者之间没有明显差异(P=0.68-0.97)。大多数 CAB TEAEs 的严重程度为轻度-中度,安全性/耐受性方面没有与年龄相关的趋势。结论固定剂量、三联CAB凝胶对中重度痤疮患者有效,且耐受性良好,与年龄无关。大约一半的儿童/青少年和成人患者使用CAB后皮肤变得清澈/几乎清澈,皮损数量减少>70%。资金来源:Ortho DermatologicsOrtho Dermatologics
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Off-Label Uses of Upadacitinib Stability of Long-Term Therapeutic Responses to Tralokinumab in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis What Do Clinicians Mean When Submitting a Biopsy as “Rule Out Eczema” Deucravacitinib in Plaque Psoriasis: Maintenance of Response Over 4 Years in the Phase 3 POETYK PSO-1, PSO-2, and LTE Trials Zosteriform Atrophoderma of Pasini and Pierini: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1