Spesolimab Rapidly Improves Quality of Life in Patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis, as per Dermatology Life Quality Index Scores: Data from the Effisayil 2 Trial

Alice B. Gottlieb, B. Strober, Georgios Kokolakis, Joseph F. Merola, Min Zheng, Richard G. Langley, Ming Tang, Patrick Hofmann, C. Thoma, Richard B Warren
{"title":"Spesolimab Rapidly Improves Quality of Life in Patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis, as per Dermatology Life Quality Index Scores: Data from the Effisayil 2 Trial","authors":"Alice B. Gottlieb, B. Strober, Georgios Kokolakis, Joseph F. Merola, Min Zheng, Richard G. Langley, Ming Tang, Patrick Hofmann, C. Thoma, Richard B Warren","doi":"10.25251/skin.8.supp.409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic and potentially life-threatening disease characterized by flares of widespread skin pustulation. In Effisayil 2 (NCT04399837), high‑dose spesolimab was superior to placebo in GPP flare prevention and numerically reduced the risk of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) worsening (≥4-point increase in total score from baseline; secondary endpoint), up to Week 48. \nMethods Here, we further analyze the effect of high-dose spesolimab versus placebo on DLQI in Effisayil 2. \nResults Baseline characteristics were generally similar in the high-dose spesolimab (600 mg loading dose then 300 mg every 4 weeks [N=30]) and placebo groups (N=31) in terms of sex, age, length of disease, and historical flare frequency, although the high‑dose spesolimab group had a higher mean±SD DLQI score (11.1±6.9 [missing=1]) versus placebo (7.2±5.6 [missing=0]). At Week 4 in exploratory analysis, more patients in the high-dose spesolimab group (N=29) had no GPP flare and ≥4-point improvement in their DLQI score versus placebo (N=31) (n/N [%]: 10/29 [34.5%] [missing=1] versus 3/31 [9.7%] [missing=0]) at Week 4; this was also seen at Week 48 (11/29 [37.9%] [missing=6] versus 8/31 [25.8%] [missing=0], respectively). Furthermore, a higher proportion of patients treated with spesolimab had no GPP flare and reached a DLQI score of 0 or 1 at all visits up to Week 48 versus placebo (7/29 [24.1%] versus 1/31 [3.2%], respectively). \nConclusion Adding to previous data from Effisayil 2, this analysis demonstrates that patients treated with spesolimab (including high-dose) rapidly gained improvements in DLQI scores versus placebo, which were sustained through to Week 48.","PeriodicalId":22013,"journal":{"name":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.supp.409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic and potentially life-threatening disease characterized by flares of widespread skin pustulation. In Effisayil 2 (NCT04399837), high‑dose spesolimab was superior to placebo in GPP flare prevention and numerically reduced the risk of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) worsening (≥4-point increase in total score from baseline; secondary endpoint), up to Week 48. Methods Here, we further analyze the effect of high-dose spesolimab versus placebo on DLQI in Effisayil 2. Results Baseline characteristics were generally similar in the high-dose spesolimab (600 mg loading dose then 300 mg every 4 weeks [N=30]) and placebo groups (N=31) in terms of sex, age, length of disease, and historical flare frequency, although the high‑dose spesolimab group had a higher mean±SD DLQI score (11.1±6.9 [missing=1]) versus placebo (7.2±5.6 [missing=0]). At Week 4 in exploratory analysis, more patients in the high-dose spesolimab group (N=29) had no GPP flare and ≥4-point improvement in their DLQI score versus placebo (N=31) (n/N [%]: 10/29 [34.5%] [missing=1] versus 3/31 [9.7%] [missing=0]) at Week 4; this was also seen at Week 48 (11/29 [37.9%] [missing=6] versus 8/31 [25.8%] [missing=0], respectively). Furthermore, a higher proportion of patients treated with spesolimab had no GPP flare and reached a DLQI score of 0 or 1 at all visits up to Week 48 versus placebo (7/29 [24.1%] versus 1/31 [3.2%], respectively). Conclusion Adding to previous data from Effisayil 2, this analysis demonstrates that patients treated with spesolimab (including high-dose) rapidly gained improvements in DLQI scores versus placebo, which were sustained through to Week 48.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据皮肤科生活质量指数评分,斯派索利单抗可迅速改善泛发性脓疱型银屑病患者的生活质量:来自 Effisayil 2 试验的数据
导言:泛发性脓疱型银屑病(GPP)是一种慢性疾病,可能危及生命,其特点是皮肤广泛脓疱发作。在Effisayil 2(NCT04399837)研究中,大剂量斯派索利单抗在预防GPP复发方面的效果优于安慰剂,并在第48周之前从数字上降低了皮肤科生活质量指数(DLQI)恶化的风险(总分比基线增加≥4分;次要终点)。方法 在此,我们进一步分析了大剂量斯派索利单抗与安慰剂相比对艾菲赛2的DLQI的影响。结果 大剂量斯派索利单抗组(600 毫克负荷剂量,然后每 4 周 300 毫克[N=30])和安慰剂组(N=31)在性别、年龄、病程和历史发作频率方面的基线特征基本相似,但大剂量斯派索利单抗组的 DLQI 平均分(±SD)(11.1±6.9 [缺失=1])高于安慰剂组(7.2±5.6 [缺失=0])。在第4周的探索性分析中,大剂量斯派索利单抗组(N=29)与安慰剂组(N=31)相比(n/N [%]:10/29 [34.5%] [缺失=1] 对 3/31 [9.7%] [缺失=0]),有更多患者在第4周没有GPP复发且DLQI评分改善≥4分;在第48周也是如此(分别为11/29 [37.9%] [缺失=6] 对 8/31 [25.8%] [缺失=0])。此外,与安慰剂相比,接受斯派索利单抗治疗的患者中,有更高比例的患者在第48周之前的所有访视中均未出现GPP复发并达到DLQI评分0或1分(分别为7/29[24.1%]对1/31[3.2%])。结论 除了先前Effisayil 2的数据外,本分析结果表明,与安慰剂相比,接受斯派索利单抗(包括大剂量)治疗的患者的DLQI评分迅速得到改善,而且这种改善一直持续到第48周。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Off-Label Uses of Upadacitinib Stability of Long-Term Therapeutic Responses to Tralokinumab in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis What Do Clinicians Mean When Submitting a Biopsy as “Rule Out Eczema” Deucravacitinib in Plaque Psoriasis: Maintenance of Response Over 4 Years in the Phase 3 POETYK PSO-1, PSO-2, and LTE Trials Zosteriform Atrophoderma of Pasini and Pierini: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1