Antibacterial, Antibiofilm Activities and Toxicity of Uvaria chamae P. Beauv (Annonaceae)

B. Oluremi, J.J. Oloche, P.D. Abiona, C.B. Ofudi
{"title":"Antibacterial, Antibiofilm Activities and Toxicity of Uvaria chamae P. Beauv (Annonaceae)","authors":"B. Oluremi, J.J. Oloche, P.D. Abiona, C.B. Ofudi","doi":"10.4314/njpr.v20i1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bacteria biofilms are a serious global health concern. The rapid increase of antimicrobial resistance in diarrheagenic  bacteria due to biofilm formation has limited the clinical usefulness of some antibiotics in circulation. \nObjectives: Uvaria chamae has shown broad spectrum antibacterial activity, hence the need to study its antibiofilm activity against  enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) strains implicated in paediatric diarrhoea. \nMethods: Samples of authenticated U. chamae root, stem and leaf were collected, air-dried, ground and extracted by cold maceration in  dichloromethane and methanol separately. The EAEC strains tested were; O42, DH5α, MN5DE, D25D and D28I. The plant extracts were  subjected to quantitative and qualitative phytochemical screening and the 50% lethality (LC50) brine shrimp assay carried out. Extracts  were screened for antibacterial activity using agar diffusion method, while agar dilution and broth dilution methods were used to  determine minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations, respectively. Biofilm inhibition of the active extracts was investigated by  crystal violet method. \nResults: All the EAEC strains were multi-drug resistant, but susceptible to gentamicin and azithromycin. Dichloromethane leaf extract (DLE) and methanol leaf extract (MLE) inhibited the growth of the tested EAEC strains with the MIC of MLE  D28I being MIC 3.75 mg/mL. The percentage biofilm inhibition by MLE against EAEC strains O42, MND5E and D25D were 72%, 74.5%, and  63%, respectively. Alkaloids were the most abundant in the methanol leaf extract of U. chamae (MLE). The extracts had LC50 >1000 μg/ mL. \nConclusion: Uvaria chamae is non-toxic and possesses antibiofilm potential that could be further developed as a natural remedy for  diarrhoea.","PeriodicalId":19298,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Pharmaceutical research","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Pharmaceutical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/njpr.v20i1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bacteria biofilms are a serious global health concern. The rapid increase of antimicrobial resistance in diarrheagenic  bacteria due to biofilm formation has limited the clinical usefulness of some antibiotics in circulation. Objectives: Uvaria chamae has shown broad spectrum antibacterial activity, hence the need to study its antibiofilm activity against  enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) strains implicated in paediatric diarrhoea. Methods: Samples of authenticated U. chamae root, stem and leaf were collected, air-dried, ground and extracted by cold maceration in  dichloromethane and methanol separately. The EAEC strains tested were; O42, DH5α, MN5DE, D25D and D28I. The plant extracts were  subjected to quantitative and qualitative phytochemical screening and the 50% lethality (LC50) brine shrimp assay carried out. Extracts  were screened for antibacterial activity using agar diffusion method, while agar dilution and broth dilution methods were used to  determine minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations, respectively. Biofilm inhibition of the active extracts was investigated by  crystal violet method. Results: All the EAEC strains were multi-drug resistant, but susceptible to gentamicin and azithromycin. Dichloromethane leaf extract (DLE) and methanol leaf extract (MLE) inhibited the growth of the tested EAEC strains with the MIC of MLE  D28I being MIC 3.75 mg/mL. The percentage biofilm inhibition by MLE against EAEC strains O42, MND5E and D25D were 72%, 74.5%, and  63%, respectively. Alkaloids were the most abundant in the methanol leaf extract of U. chamae (MLE). The extracts had LC50 >1000 μg/ mL. Conclusion: Uvaria chamae is non-toxic and possesses antibiofilm potential that could be further developed as a natural remedy for  diarrhoea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uvaria chamae P. Beauv (Annonaceae) 的抗菌、抗生物膜活性和毒性Beauv(芒萁科)
背景:细菌生物膜是一个严重的全球健康问题。由于生物膜的形成,腹泻致病菌的抗菌药耐药性迅速增加,限制了一些抗生素在临床上的应用。研究目的Uvaria chamae 具有广谱抗菌活性,因此有必要研究它对儿科腹泻中肠聚集性大肠杆菌 (EAEC) 菌株的抗生物膜活性。方法:采集经鉴定的 U. chamae 根、茎和叶样本,风干后研磨,分别用二氯甲烷和甲醇冷浸泡提取。测试的 EAEC 菌株为:O42、DH5α、MN5DE、D25D 和 D28I。对植物提取物进行了定量和定性植物化学筛选,并进行了盐水虾 50%致死率(LC50)试验。使用琼脂扩散法对提取物进行抗菌活性筛选,同时使用琼脂稀释法和肉汤稀释法分别确定最低抑菌浓度和杀菌浓度。用水晶紫法研究了活性提取物对生物膜的抑制作用。结果所有 EAEC 菌株均对多种药物耐药,但对庆大霉素和阿奇霉素敏感。二氯甲烷叶提取物(DLE)和甲醇叶提取物(MLE)抑制了受测 EAEC 菌株的生长,其中 MLE D28I 的 MIC 为 3.75 mg/mL。MLE 对 EAEC 菌株 O42、MND5E 和 D25D 的生物膜抑制率分别为 72%、74.5% 和 63%。U. chamae 的甲醇叶提取物(MLE)中生物碱含量最高。提取物的 LC50 >1000 μg/ mL。结论Uvaria chamae 无毒,具有抗生物膜的潜力,可进一步开发为治疗腹泻的天然药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In Silico Identification of Canthin-6-one as a Pancreatic Lipase Inhibitory Anti-Obesity Drug Lead from Hibiscus Sabdariffa Antifungal Activity of Alchornea cordifolia and Ficus exasperata Leaves Against Trichophyton mentagrophyte and Trichophyton verrucosum Development and Evaluation of Encapsulated Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery System of Hydrochlorothiazide Effect of Hibiscus Sabdariffa (Linn) Water Extract on the Pharmacokinetics of Lisinopril in Healthy Human Volunteers Effect of Garcinia kola on Atorvastatin Dissolution Profile: An Indication for Possible Drug-Drug Interactions After Oral Administration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1