Laser technologies in the treatment of patients with a combination of rosacea subtypes: comparative data

A. L. Rodina, Yu. I. Matushevskaya, G. V. Sofinskaya
{"title":"Laser technologies in the treatment of patients with a combination of rosacea subtypes: comparative data","authors":"A. L. Rodina, Yu. I. Matushevskaya, G. V. Sofinskaya","doi":"10.33667/2078-5631-2024-9-80-82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phototechnologies occupy a leading position in the treatment of patients with rosacea. The most effective technologies are laser: pulsed dye laser (585nm, 595nm) and neodymium laser (1064nm), however, issues of comparative analysis, including in patients with a combination of rosacea subtypes, require further study.Material and methods. We observed 64 patients with diagnosed rosacea with a combination of subtypes: erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular. Among them, 48 (75%) were female and 16 (25%) were male. The age of the patients varied widely: from 31 to 57 years, the average age was 39.2±4.6 years. The average duration of the disease was 5.1±2.3 years. Depending on the therapy, patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 received treatment with a neodymium laser, group 2 – treatment with a pulsed dye laser.Research results. A cumulative assessment taking into account clinical research methods with a sufficient degree of reliability revealed the advantages of a neodymium laser over a pulsed dye laser, regardless of the clinical picture of rosacea, which was confirmed by the dynamics of the IGA/PGA indices: reduction in group 1 was 79.5%/66.7%, in group 2–63.2%/51.3%, respectively. These data were confirmed by the dynamics of the DIQI index – 81.7% and 61.6%, respectively.","PeriodicalId":18337,"journal":{"name":"Medical alphabet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical alphabet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2024-9-80-82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phototechnologies occupy a leading position in the treatment of patients with rosacea. The most effective technologies are laser: pulsed dye laser (585nm, 595nm) and neodymium laser (1064nm), however, issues of comparative analysis, including in patients with a combination of rosacea subtypes, require further study.Material and methods. We observed 64 patients with diagnosed rosacea with a combination of subtypes: erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular. Among them, 48 (75%) were female and 16 (25%) were male. The age of the patients varied widely: from 31 to 57 years, the average age was 39.2±4.6 years. The average duration of the disease was 5.1±2.3 years. Depending on the therapy, patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 received treatment with a neodymium laser, group 2 – treatment with a pulsed dye laser.Research results. A cumulative assessment taking into account clinical research methods with a sufficient degree of reliability revealed the advantages of a neodymium laser over a pulsed dye laser, regardless of the clinical picture of rosacea, which was confirmed by the dynamics of the IGA/PGA indices: reduction in group 1 was 79.5%/66.7%, in group 2–63.2%/51.3%, respectively. These data were confirmed by the dynamics of the DIQI index – 81.7% and 61.6%, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光技术在红斑痤疮综合亚型患者治疗中的应用:比较数据
光电技术在酒糟鼻患者的治疗中占据主导地位。最有效的技术是激光:脉冲染料激光(585nm、595nm)和钕激光(1064nm),然而,需要进一步研究比较分析的问题,包括酒糟鼻亚型组合患者的比较分析。我们观察了 64 名确诊为酒渣鼻的患者,他们都有不同的亚型:红斑扩张型和丘疹脓疱型。其中,女性 48 人(占 75%),男性 16 人(占 25%)。患者的年龄差异很大:从 31 岁到 57 岁不等,平均年龄为(39.2±4.6)岁。平均病程为 5.1±2.3 年。根据治疗方法的不同,患者被分为两组:第一组接受钕激光治疗,第二组接受脉冲染料激光治疗。根据具有足够可靠性的临床研究方法进行的累积评估显示,无论红斑痤疮的临床表现如何,钕激光都比脉冲染料激光更有优势,这一点在 IGA/PGA 指数的动态变化中得到了证实:第一组的减少率分别为 79.5%/66.7%,第二组为 63.2%/51.3%。DIQI 指数的动态变化也证实了这些数据--分别为 81.7% 和 61.6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kidney autotransplantation with renal arteries injury in a patient with Takayasu arteritis Osteopoikilia in the practice of a rheumatologist Современные маркеры диагностики сочетания анкилозирующего спондилита и воспалительных заболеваний кишечника Onset of Rheumatoid Arthritis with eye manifestations (clinical case report) Peculiarities of laboratory parameters dynamics during helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1