Distinct gut microbiomes in Thai patients with colorectal polyps

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY World Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-07-21 DOI:10.3748/wjg.v30.i27.3336
Thoranin Intarajak, Wandee Udomchaiprasertkul, A. Khoiri, S. Sutheeworapong, K. Kusonmano, W. Kittichotirat, Chinae Thammarongtham, Supapon Cheevadhanarak
{"title":"Distinct gut microbiomes in Thai patients with colorectal polyps","authors":"Thoranin Intarajak, Wandee Udomchaiprasertkul, A. Khoiri, S. Sutheeworapong, K. Kusonmano, W. Kittichotirat, Chinae Thammarongtham, Supapon Cheevadhanarak","doi":"10.3748/wjg.v30.i27.3336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Colorectal polyps that develop via the conventional adenoma-carcinoma sequence [e.g. , tubular adenoma (TA)] often progress to malignancy and are closely associated with changes in the composition of the gut microbiome. There is limited research concerning the microbial functions and gut microbiomes associated with colorectal polyps that arise through the serrated polyp pathway, such as hyperplastic polyps (HP). Exploration of microbiome alterations associated with HP and TA would improve the understanding of mechanisms by which specific microbes and their metabolic pathways contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis.\n AIM\n To investigate gut microbiome signatures, microbial associations, and microbial functions in HP and TA patients.\n METHODS\n Full-length 16S rRNA sequencing was used to characterize the gut microbiome in stool samples from control participants without polyps [control group (CT), n = 40], patients with HP (n = 52), and patients with TA (n = 60). Significant differences in gut microbiome composition and functional mechanisms were identified between the CT group and patients with HP or TA. Analytical techniques in this study included differential abundance analysis, co-occurrence network analysis, and differential pathway analysis.\n RESULTS\n Colorectal cancer (CRC)-associated bacteria, including Streptococcus gallolyticus (S. gallolyticus ), Bacteroides fragilis , and Clostridium symbiosum , were identified as characteristic microbial species in TA patients. Mediterraneibacter gnavus, associated with dysbiosis and gastrointestinal diseases, was significantly differentially abundant in the HP and TA groups. Functional pathway analysis revealed that HP patients exhibited enrichment in the sulfur oxidation pathway exclusively, whereas TA patients showed dominance in pathways related to secondary metabolite biosynthesis (e.g. , mevalonate); S. gallolyticus was a major contributor. Co-occurrence network and dynamic network analyses revealed co-occurrence of dysbiosis-associated bacteria in HP patients, whereas TA patients exhibited co-occurrence of CRC-associated bacteria. Furthermore, the co-occurrence of SCFA-producing bacteria was lower in TA patients than HP patients.\n CONCLUSION\n This study revealed distinct gut microbiome signatures associated with pathways of colorectal polyp development, providing insights concerning the roles of microbial species, functional pathways, and microbial interactions in colorectal carcinogenesis.","PeriodicalId":23778,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i27.3336","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Colorectal polyps that develop via the conventional adenoma-carcinoma sequence [e.g. , tubular adenoma (TA)] often progress to malignancy and are closely associated with changes in the composition of the gut microbiome. There is limited research concerning the microbial functions and gut microbiomes associated with colorectal polyps that arise through the serrated polyp pathway, such as hyperplastic polyps (HP). Exploration of microbiome alterations associated with HP and TA would improve the understanding of mechanisms by which specific microbes and their metabolic pathways contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis. AIM To investigate gut microbiome signatures, microbial associations, and microbial functions in HP and TA patients. METHODS Full-length 16S rRNA sequencing was used to characterize the gut microbiome in stool samples from control participants without polyps [control group (CT), n = 40], patients with HP (n = 52), and patients with TA (n = 60). Significant differences in gut microbiome composition and functional mechanisms were identified between the CT group and patients with HP or TA. Analytical techniques in this study included differential abundance analysis, co-occurrence network analysis, and differential pathway analysis. RESULTS Colorectal cancer (CRC)-associated bacteria, including Streptococcus gallolyticus (S. gallolyticus ), Bacteroides fragilis , and Clostridium symbiosum , were identified as characteristic microbial species in TA patients. Mediterraneibacter gnavus, associated with dysbiosis and gastrointestinal diseases, was significantly differentially abundant in the HP and TA groups. Functional pathway analysis revealed that HP patients exhibited enrichment in the sulfur oxidation pathway exclusively, whereas TA patients showed dominance in pathways related to secondary metabolite biosynthesis (e.g. , mevalonate); S. gallolyticus was a major contributor. Co-occurrence network and dynamic network analyses revealed co-occurrence of dysbiosis-associated bacteria in HP patients, whereas TA patients exhibited co-occurrence of CRC-associated bacteria. Furthermore, the co-occurrence of SCFA-producing bacteria was lower in TA patients than HP patients. CONCLUSION This study revealed distinct gut microbiome signatures associated with pathways of colorectal polyp development, providing insights concerning the roles of microbial species, functional pathways, and microbial interactions in colorectal carcinogenesis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰国结直肠息肉患者体内不同的肠道微生物群
背景 通过传统的腺瘤-癌序列(如管状腺瘤(TA))发展而来的结直肠息肉通常会发展成恶性肿瘤,并且与肠道微生物组的组成变化密切相关。有关通过锯齿状息肉途径产生的结直肠息肉(如增生性息肉(HP))的微生物功能和肠道微生物组的研究十分有限。探索与 HP 和 TA 相关的微生物组改变将有助于更好地了解特定微生物及其代谢途径导致结直肠癌发生的机制。目的 研究 HP 和 TA 患者的肠道微生物组特征、微生物关联和微生物功能。方法 使用全长 16S rRNA 测序来描述无息肉的对照组参与者[对照组(CT),n = 40]、HP 患者(n = 52)和 TA 患者(n = 60)粪便样本中肠道微生物组的特征。结果发现,CT 组与 HP 或 TA 患者的肠道微生物组组成和功能机制存在显著差异。本研究的分析技术包括差异丰度分析、共生网络分析和差异通路分析。结果 大肠癌(CRC)相关细菌,包括胆溶血性链球菌(S. gallolyticus)、脆弱拟杆菌(Bacteroides fragilis)和共生梭菌(Clostridium symbiosum)被确定为 TA 患者的特征性微生物物种。与菌群失调和胃肠道疾病相关的地中海杆菌(Mediterraneibacter gnavus)在 HP 组和 TA 组中的数量明显不同。功能通路分析表明,HP 患者只在硫氧化通路中表现出富集,而 TA 患者则在与次级代谢物生物合成(如甲羟戊酸)相关的通路中表现出优势;S. gallolyticus 是主要的贡献者。共生网络和动态网络分析显示,HP 患者中与菌群失调相关的细菌共生,而 TA 患者中与 CRC 相关的细菌共生。此外,TA 患者中产生 SCFA 的细菌的共存率低于 HP 患者。结论 本研究揭示了与结直肠息肉发生途径相关的不同肠道微生物组特征,为微生物物种、功能途径和微生物相互作用在结直肠癌发生中的作用提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastroenterology
World Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
464
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The primary aims of the WJG are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
Autophagy and its role in gastrointestinal diseases. Beyond bacteria: Role of non-bacterial gut microbiota species in inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer progression. Computed tomography-based multi-organ radiomics nomogram model for predicting the risk of esophagogastric variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Construction and validation of a pancreatic cancer prognostic model based on genes related to the hypoxic tumor microenvironment. Dual-targeted treatment for inflammatory bowel disease: Whether fecal microbiota transplantation can be an important part of it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1