{"title":"Analysis of experience in the clinical use of dual-energy computed tomography in patients with undifferentiated arthritis","authors":"M. S. Eliseev, Y. I. Kuzmina","doi":"10.33667/2078-5631-2024-10-19-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is a radiation diagnostic method that is used in rheumatology to verify microcrystalline arthritis, but in Russia this method is little known and the experience of its use is rather scarce.Objective of the research. To analyze the experience of using DECT in patients with undifferentiated arthritis and lesions of the axial skeleton in clinical practice.Material and Methods. The retrospective study included 20 patients (14 men and 6 women) observed at the V. A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, who underwent DECT for diagnostic purposes. 13 patients with undifferentiated arthritis underwent DECT of peripheral joints to diagnose gout; 7 patients with an established diagnosis of gout (based on the 2015 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for gout) – to clarify the genesis of lesions to the axial joints and spine. The study was performed on a Siemens SOMATOM Definition Flash computed tomograph.Results. Using DECT in patients with undifferentiated arthritis, deposits of monosodium urate crystals (MSUc) were detected in 7 out of 13 (54 %), which made it possible to verify the diagnosis of gout. In the second sample, 6 out of 7 patients (85 %) showed signs of MSUc deposition on DECT, which explained the genesis of the existing complaints. Among these 6 patients, in 1 person, DECT revealed the presence of MSUc and calcium pyrophosphate crystals in the shoulder joint, which made it possible to make two diagnoses at once – gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease.Conclusion. DECT in patients with undifferentiated arthritis makes it possible to verify the diagnosis of gout in more than half of the cases (54 %). In 85 % of patients with gout and pain in the back and axial joints of unknown origin, urate deposits are detected according to DECT. This method may be a useful tool for identifying microcrystalline arthritis of the axial joints, but further research is needed to implement the method in routine practice.","PeriodicalId":18337,"journal":{"name":"Medical alphabet","volume":"85 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical alphabet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2024-10-19-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is a radiation diagnostic method that is used in rheumatology to verify microcrystalline arthritis, but in Russia this method is little known and the experience of its use is rather scarce.Objective of the research. To analyze the experience of using DECT in patients with undifferentiated arthritis and lesions of the axial skeleton in clinical practice.Material and Methods. The retrospective study included 20 patients (14 men and 6 women) observed at the V. A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, who underwent DECT for diagnostic purposes. 13 patients with undifferentiated arthritis underwent DECT of peripheral joints to diagnose gout; 7 patients with an established diagnosis of gout (based on the 2015 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for gout) – to clarify the genesis of lesions to the axial joints and spine. The study was performed on a Siemens SOMATOM Definition Flash computed tomograph.Results. Using DECT in patients with undifferentiated arthritis, deposits of monosodium urate crystals (MSUc) were detected in 7 out of 13 (54 %), which made it possible to verify the diagnosis of gout. In the second sample, 6 out of 7 patients (85 %) showed signs of MSUc deposition on DECT, which explained the genesis of the existing complaints. Among these 6 patients, in 1 person, DECT revealed the presence of MSUc and calcium pyrophosphate crystals in the shoulder joint, which made it possible to make two diagnoses at once – gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease.Conclusion. DECT in patients with undifferentiated arthritis makes it possible to verify the diagnosis of gout in more than half of the cases (54 %). In 85 % of patients with gout and pain in the back and axial joints of unknown origin, urate deposits are detected according to DECT. This method may be a useful tool for identifying microcrystalline arthritis of the axial joints, but further research is needed to implement the method in routine practice.