Nitrogen recovery from intensive livestock farms using a simplified ammonia stripping process

A. Finzi, O. Ferrari, E. Riva, G. Provolo
{"title":"Nitrogen recovery from intensive livestock farms using a simplified ammonia stripping process","authors":"A. Finzi, O. Ferrari, E. Riva, G. Provolo","doi":"10.3389/fsufs.2024.1406962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ammonia (NH3) stripping process can recover nitrogen (N) from slurry and digestates as a mineral fertilizer, but it is currently expensive and difficult to manage at the farm level. Hence, a simple process is required. This study aimed to test a modular (based on farm N surplus) slow-release NH3 stripping process at a pilot plant scale. NH3 volatilization was promoted in a closed reactor, and then, the NH3 was removed by an air stream through the reactor headspace. The NH3-loaded air was purified in a scrubber, where NH3 reacted with sulfuric acid to form ammonium sulfate (AS). In total, 11 trials were conducted using pig slurry, dairy cattle slurry, and digestates: 7 trials were carried out with the reactors heated to 40°C, 2 trials were carried out at an ambient temperature, and the other 2 trials were carried out with the addition of sodium hydroxide (NaOH). To assess the technical–economic sustainability of the pilot plant, the total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN) removal rate, electricity consumption, acid requirements, and AS quality and costs were evaluated. The pilot plant yielded TAN recovery amounts of 45% in 2 weeks with the reactors heated to 40°C, 64% in 1 week with NaOH addition, and 25% in 2 weeks at an ambient temperature. The N concentration in the AS solution reached 85.9 g kg−1, with an average value of 35.2 g kg−1. The electricity consumption, acid requirement, and operational costs in an optimized system were approximately 0.52 kWh kgN−1 recovered, 3.5 kg pure acid kgN−1 recovered, and 0.86 € kgN−1 recovered, respectively. Compared to other technologies, the simplified stripping process is slower but with similar removal efficiencies and lower energy consumption. Thus, this finding could be suitable for improving the N use in intensive livestock farms.","PeriodicalId":504481,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","volume":"107 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1406962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ammonia (NH3) stripping process can recover nitrogen (N) from slurry and digestates as a mineral fertilizer, but it is currently expensive and difficult to manage at the farm level. Hence, a simple process is required. This study aimed to test a modular (based on farm N surplus) slow-release NH3 stripping process at a pilot plant scale. NH3 volatilization was promoted in a closed reactor, and then, the NH3 was removed by an air stream through the reactor headspace. The NH3-loaded air was purified in a scrubber, where NH3 reacted with sulfuric acid to form ammonium sulfate (AS). In total, 11 trials were conducted using pig slurry, dairy cattle slurry, and digestates: 7 trials were carried out with the reactors heated to 40°C, 2 trials were carried out at an ambient temperature, and the other 2 trials were carried out with the addition of sodium hydroxide (NaOH). To assess the technical–economic sustainability of the pilot plant, the total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN) removal rate, electricity consumption, acid requirements, and AS quality and costs were evaluated. The pilot plant yielded TAN recovery amounts of 45% in 2 weeks with the reactors heated to 40°C, 64% in 1 week with NaOH addition, and 25% in 2 weeks at an ambient temperature. The N concentration in the AS solution reached 85.9 g kg−1, with an average value of 35.2 g kg−1. The electricity consumption, acid requirement, and operational costs in an optimized system were approximately 0.52 kWh kgN−1 recovered, 3.5 kg pure acid kgN−1 recovered, and 0.86 € kgN−1 recovered, respectively. Compared to other technologies, the simplified stripping process is slower but with similar removal efficiencies and lower energy consumption. Thus, this finding could be suitable for improving the N use in intensive livestock farms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用简化的氨汽提工艺从集约化畜牧场回收氮气
氨(NH3)汽提工艺可以从泥浆和沼渣中回收氮(N)作为矿物肥料,但目前成本高昂,且难以在农场层面进行管理。因此,需要一种简单的工艺。本研究旨在试验性工厂规模测试模块化(基于农场氮过剩量)缓释 NH3 汽提工艺。在封闭的反应器中促进 NH3 的挥发,然后通过反应器顶空的气流去除 NH3。含 NH3 的空气在洗涤器中净化,NH3 在洗涤器中与硫酸反应生成硫酸铵 (AS)。总共进行了 11 次试验,使用了猪粪浆、奶牛粪浆和沼渣:其中 7 项试验是在反应器加热到 40°C 的情况下进行的,2 项试验是在环境温度下进行的,另外 2 项试验是在加入氢氧化钠 (NaOH) 的情况下进行的。为了评估试验工厂的技术经济可持续性,对总氨氮(TAN)去除率、耗电量、酸需求量、AS 质量和成本进行了评估。在反应器加热到 40°C 的情况下,试验工厂在 2 周内的氨氮回收率为 45%;在添加 NaOH 的情况下,1 周内的氨氮回收率为 64%;在环境温度下,2 周内的氨氮回收率为 25%。AS 溶液中的氮浓度达到 85.9 g kg-1,平均值为 35.2 g kg-1。优化系统的耗电量、酸需求量和运行成本分别约为 0.52 kWh kgN-1、3.5 kg 纯酸 kgN-1 和 0.86 欧元 kgN-1。与其他技术相比,简化的汽提工艺虽然速度较慢,但去除效率和能耗都很低。因此,这一发现适用于提高集约化畜牧场的氮利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fish kills and insecticides: historical water quality patterns in 10 agricultural watersheds in Prince Edward Island, Canada (2002–2022) Bedding material properties and slurry C/N ratio affect the availability of nitrogen in cattle slurry applied to soil Editorial: Agrochemicals in agricultural and non-agricultural settings: fate, distribution, and potential human and environmental health hazards Analysis of the driving path of e-commerce to high-quality agricultural development in China: empirical evidence from mediating effect models Unravelling the synergistic effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and vermicompost on improving plant growth,nutrient absorption, and secondary metabolite production in ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1