{"title":"Effect of table height on supraglottic airway insertion (I-gel): A randomized control trial","authors":"P. Kumari, Amarjeet Kumar, C. Sinha, Ajeet Kumar","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_140_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Both operating table height and patient level in relation to the anesthesiologist influence supraglottic airway device (SAD) insertion and task performance in terms of physical and mental workload. The aim of the study was to find out the appropriate table height during SAD insertion in terms of time taken for insertion, success rate, ease of insertion, and anesthesiologist comfort.\n \n \n \n In this randomized controlled trial, 90 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients, aged between 18 and 60 years, scheduled for elective surgery were recruited. Patients were divided into three groups of 30 each. During SAD insertion, the table height was adjusted so that the patient’s forehead was at the level of 5 cm above the xiphoid process in group I, at the level of the xiphoid process in group II, and at the level of 5 cm below the xiphoid process in group III of the anesthesiologist. We measured SAD insertion time, first attempt success rate, ease of insertion, and anesthesiologist comfort during the procedure.\n \n \n \n The SAD insertion time (in seconds) was lower in group III than in groups I and II, and a significant difference was found between the groups (P < 0.05). The mean ease of insertion score, anesthesiologist comfort, and the first-attempt success rate of SAD insertion were higher in group III than in groups I and II, and the difference among the groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05).\n \n \n \n We conclude that the lower table height with the patient’s forehead at the level of 5 cm below the xiphoid process of the anesthesiologist is ergonomically more efficient during SAD (I-gel) insertion. This table height is also more comfortable for the anesthesiologist during SAD placement.\n","PeriodicalId":508221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"117 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_140_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Both operating table height and patient level in relation to the anesthesiologist influence supraglottic airway device (SAD) insertion and task performance in terms of physical and mental workload. The aim of the study was to find out the appropriate table height during SAD insertion in terms of time taken for insertion, success rate, ease of insertion, and anesthesiologist comfort.
In this randomized controlled trial, 90 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients, aged between 18 and 60 years, scheduled for elective surgery were recruited. Patients were divided into three groups of 30 each. During SAD insertion, the table height was adjusted so that the patient’s forehead was at the level of 5 cm above the xiphoid process in group I, at the level of the xiphoid process in group II, and at the level of 5 cm below the xiphoid process in group III of the anesthesiologist. We measured SAD insertion time, first attempt success rate, ease of insertion, and anesthesiologist comfort during the procedure.
The SAD insertion time (in seconds) was lower in group III than in groups I and II, and a significant difference was found between the groups (P < 0.05). The mean ease of insertion score, anesthesiologist comfort, and the first-attempt success rate of SAD insertion were higher in group III than in groups I and II, and the difference among the groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
We conclude that the lower table height with the patient’s forehead at the level of 5 cm below the xiphoid process of the anesthesiologist is ergonomically more efficient during SAD (I-gel) insertion. This table height is also more comfortable for the anesthesiologist during SAD placement.
手术台的高度和患者与麻醉师的相对水平都会影响声门上气道装置(SAD)的插入和任务执行的体力和脑力工作量。该研究旨在从插入所需时间、成功率、插入难易度和麻醉师舒适度等方面找出插入 SAD 时合适的手术台高度。 在这项随机对照试验中,共招募了 90 名美国麻醉医师协会身体状况 I 级和 II 级的患者,他们的年龄在 18 岁至 60 岁之间,计划进行择期手术。患者被分为三组,每组 30 人。在插入 SAD 时,麻醉师调节手术台高度,使 I 组患者的前额位于剑突上方 5 厘米处,II 组患者的前额位于剑突水平处,III 组患者的前额位于剑突下方 5 厘米处。我们测量了 SAD 插入时间、首次尝试成功率、插入难易度以及麻醉师在手术过程中的舒适度。 第三组的 SAD 插入时间(秒)低于第一组和第二组,组间差异显著(P < 0.05)。第三组的平均插入难易度评分、麻醉师舒适度和 SAD 首次插入成功率均高于第一组和第二组,组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。 我们得出结论,在插入 SAD(I-凝胶)时,麻醉师将患者前额置于剑突下 5 厘米处的较低手术台高度更符合人体工程学。麻醉师在置入 SAD 时,这种手术台高度也更舒适。