Revisiting regression methods for estimating long-term trends in sea surface temperature

Ming‐Huei Chang, Yen-Chen Huang, Yu‐Hsin Cheng, C. Terng, Jinyi Chen, Jyh Cherng Jan
{"title":"Revisiting regression methods for estimating long-term trends in sea surface temperature","authors":"Ming‐Huei Chang, Yen-Chen Huang, Yu‐Hsin Cheng, C. Terng, Jinyi Chen, Jyh Cherng Jan","doi":"10.5194/nhess-24-2481-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Global warming has enduring consequences in the ocean, leading to increased sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and subsequent environmental impacts, including coral bleaching and intensified tropical storms. It is imperative to monitor these trends to enable informed decision-making and adaptation. In this study, we comprehensively examine the methods for extracting long-term temperature trends, including STL, seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on LOESS (locally estimated scatterplot smoothing), and the linear regression family, which comprises the ordinary least-squares regression (OLSR), orthogonal regression (OR), and geometric-mean regression (GMR). The applicability and limitations of these methods are assessed based on experimental and simulated data. STL may stand out as the most accurate method for extracting long-term trends. However, it is associated with notably sizable computational time. In contrast, linear regression methods are far more efficient. Among these methods, GMR is not suitable due to its inherent assumption of a random temporal component. OLSR and OR are preferable for general tasks but require correction to accurately account for seasonal signal-induced bias resulting from the phase–distance imbalance. We observe that this bias can be effectively addressed by trimming the SST data to ensure that the time series becomes an even function before applying linear regression, which is named “evenization”. We compare our methods with two commonly used methods in the climate community. Our proposed method is unbiased and better than the conventional SST anomaly method. While our method may have a larger degree of uncertainty than combined linear and sinusoidal fitting, this uncertainty remains within an acceptable range. Furthermore, linear and sinusoidal fitting can be unstable when applied to natural data containing significant noise.\n","PeriodicalId":508073,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences","volume":" 769","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2481-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Global warming has enduring consequences in the ocean, leading to increased sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and subsequent environmental impacts, including coral bleaching and intensified tropical storms. It is imperative to monitor these trends to enable informed decision-making and adaptation. In this study, we comprehensively examine the methods for extracting long-term temperature trends, including STL, seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on LOESS (locally estimated scatterplot smoothing), and the linear regression family, which comprises the ordinary least-squares regression (OLSR), orthogonal regression (OR), and geometric-mean regression (GMR). The applicability and limitations of these methods are assessed based on experimental and simulated data. STL may stand out as the most accurate method for extracting long-term trends. However, it is associated with notably sizable computational time. In contrast, linear regression methods are far more efficient. Among these methods, GMR is not suitable due to its inherent assumption of a random temporal component. OLSR and OR are preferable for general tasks but require correction to accurately account for seasonal signal-induced bias resulting from the phase–distance imbalance. We observe that this bias can be effectively addressed by trimming the SST data to ensure that the time series becomes an even function before applying linear regression, which is named “evenization”. We compare our methods with two commonly used methods in the climate community. Our proposed method is unbiased and better than the conventional SST anomaly method. While our method may have a larger degree of uncertainty than combined linear and sinusoidal fitting, this uncertainty remains within an acceptable range. Furthermore, linear and sinusoidal fitting can be unstable when applied to natural data containing significant noise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视估计海面温度长期趋势的回归方法
摘要全球变暖会给海洋带来持久影响,导致海面温度(SST)升高,进而对环境造成影响,包括珊瑚漂白和热带风暴加剧。当务之急是监测这些趋势,以便做出明智的决策和调整。在本研究中,我们全面考察了提取长期温度趋势的方法,包括 STL、基于 LOESS(局部估计散点图平滑)的季节趋势分解程序,以及线性回归系列,包括普通最小二乘回归(OLSR)、正交回归(OR)和几何平均回归(GMR)。根据实验和模拟数据对这些方法的适用性和局限性进行了评估。STL 可能是提取长期趋势最准确的方法。然而,它需要耗费大量的计算时间。相比之下,线性回归方法的效率要高得多。在这些方法中,GMR 因其固有的随机时间成分假设而不适用。OLSR 和 OR 更适用于一般任务,但需要进行修正,以准确考虑相位-距离不平衡导致的季节性信号偏差。我们发现,在应用线性回归之前,可以通过修剪 SST 数据来确保时间序列成为偶函数,从而有效解决这一偏差问题,这就是 "偶化"。我们将我们的方法与气候界常用的两种方法进行了比较。我们提出的方法没有偏差,比传统的 SST 异常值方法更好。虽然与线性拟合和正弦拟合相比,我们的方法可能存在较大的不确定性,但这种不确定性仍在可接受的范围内。此外,线性拟合和正弦拟合在应用于含有大量噪声的自然数据时可能不稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flood occurrence and impact models for socioeconomic applications over Canada and the United States Harmonizing seismicity information in Central Asian countries: earthquake catalogue and active faults Model-based assessment of climate change impact on inland flood risk at the German North Sea coast caused by compounding storm tide and precipitation events Modelling crop hail damage footprints with single-polarization radar: the roles of spatial resolution, hail intensity, and cropland density A glacial lake outburst flood risk assessment for the Phochhu river basin, Bhutan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1