Assessment of carbon mass in a Mediterranean downy oak ecosystem using airborne lidar and NASA Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) data

Maëlie Chazette, P. Chazette, I. Reiter, X. Shang, J. Totems, Jean-Philippe Orts, Irène Xueref-Remy, Nicolas Montes
{"title":"Assessment of carbon mass in a Mediterranean downy oak ecosystem using airborne lidar and NASA Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) data","authors":"Maëlie Chazette, P. Chazette, I. Reiter, X. Shang, J. Totems, Jean-Philippe Orts, Irène Xueref-Remy, Nicolas Montes","doi":"10.5194/bg-21-3289-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Forest systems are the main carbon sink after the oceans. However, due to climate change, an alarming number of tree species of the Northern Hemisphere are at risk of migrating northwards or becoming extinct. This is the case for the downy oak (Quercus pubescens), one of the main species constituting the forests close to the Mediterranean Sea in France. Our aim is to retrieve aboveground carbon (AGC) and underground root carbon (UGC) stocks of the downy oak forest at the Observatoire de Haute-Provence (OHP), located about 80 km north of Marseille, in order to provide a baseline against which to assess the effect of climate change on this model species. The study presented here is based on airborne lidar observations performed on May 2012 and field measurements from 2012, 2018 and 2023 in the OHP forest. The OHP forest consists of ∼ 75 % downy oak, which is highly sensitive to global warming. Field measurements indicate minimal changes in tree growth and density between 2012 and 2023, and thus its carbon storage efficiency remains stationary. As retrieved by lidar measurements, tree top heights (TTHs) are mostly between 5 and 12 m, with an uncertainty of around 1 m. The slow evolution of trees at the OHP site makes it appropriate to use lidar data recorded in 2012 to assess the carbon stock trapped in current forest biomass. By coupling allometric laws established from field measurements with lidar observations, we show that the quantities of carbon trapped in aboveground biomass are double those trapped in the root system. Over an area of ∼ 24 ha, mean values of 15 ± 14 tC ha−1 are assessed for the aerial biomass against 8–10 ± 3–7 tC ha−1 for the roots of diameter larger than 1 cm for low and high assessments. These values depend heavily on the height of the sampled trees themselves, as well as on their location on the OHP plateau (smaller trees, 5–6 m) or on the slope (tallest trees, 10–12 m). Using a Monte Carlo approach, the relative uncertainties in AGC were calculated to be of the order of 17 % and 11 % for trees 5–6 m and 10–12 m tall, respectively. For UGC, the relative uncertainties were calculated as 8 % and 5 % for the same tree heights, but the assumptions of the allometric model are associated with biases that can easily reach 100 %. Although the surface footprints are different, we show that there is a reasonable agreement between our airborne lidar measurements and the level 2B (TTH) and (aboveground biomass) operational products of the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) mission on the International Space Station for data acquired between 2019 and 2022.\n","PeriodicalId":502171,"journal":{"name":"Biogeosciences","volume":" 449","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3289-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Forest systems are the main carbon sink after the oceans. However, due to climate change, an alarming number of tree species of the Northern Hemisphere are at risk of migrating northwards or becoming extinct. This is the case for the downy oak (Quercus pubescens), one of the main species constituting the forests close to the Mediterranean Sea in France. Our aim is to retrieve aboveground carbon (AGC) and underground root carbon (UGC) stocks of the downy oak forest at the Observatoire de Haute-Provence (OHP), located about 80 km north of Marseille, in order to provide a baseline against which to assess the effect of climate change on this model species. The study presented here is based on airborne lidar observations performed on May 2012 and field measurements from 2012, 2018 and 2023 in the OHP forest. The OHP forest consists of ∼ 75 % downy oak, which is highly sensitive to global warming. Field measurements indicate minimal changes in tree growth and density between 2012 and 2023, and thus its carbon storage efficiency remains stationary. As retrieved by lidar measurements, tree top heights (TTHs) are mostly between 5 and 12 m, with an uncertainty of around 1 m. The slow evolution of trees at the OHP site makes it appropriate to use lidar data recorded in 2012 to assess the carbon stock trapped in current forest biomass. By coupling allometric laws established from field measurements with lidar observations, we show that the quantities of carbon trapped in aboveground biomass are double those trapped in the root system. Over an area of ∼ 24 ha, mean values of 15 ± 14 tC ha−1 are assessed for the aerial biomass against 8–10 ± 3–7 tC ha−1 for the roots of diameter larger than 1 cm for low and high assessments. These values depend heavily on the height of the sampled trees themselves, as well as on their location on the OHP plateau (smaller trees, 5–6 m) or on the slope (tallest trees, 10–12 m). Using a Monte Carlo approach, the relative uncertainties in AGC were calculated to be of the order of 17 % and 11 % for trees 5–6 m and 10–12 m tall, respectively. For UGC, the relative uncertainties were calculated as 8 % and 5 % for the same tree heights, but the assumptions of the allometric model are associated with biases that can easily reach 100 %. Although the surface footprints are different, we show that there is a reasonable agreement between our airborne lidar measurements and the level 2B (TTH) and (aboveground biomass) operational products of the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) mission on the International Space Station for data acquired between 2019 and 2022.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机载激光雷达和美国国家航空航天局(NASA)全球生态系统动态调查(GEDI)数据评估地中海绒栎生态系统的碳质量
摘要森林系统是仅次于海洋的主要碳汇。然而,由于气候变化,北半球数量惊人的树种面临向北迁移或灭绝的危险。绒橡树(Quercus pubescens)就是这种情况,它是法国地中海附近森林的主要树种之一。我们的目标是检索位于马赛以北约 80 公里处上普罗旺斯观测站(OHP)的绒栎森林的地上碳储量(AGC)和地下根碳储量(UGC),以便为评估气候变化对这一示范物种的影响提供基线。本文介绍的研究基于 2012 年 5 月进行的机载激光雷达观测以及 2012 年、2018 年和 2023 年在 OHP 森林进行的实地测量。OHP 森林由 75% 的绒栎组成,绒栎对全球变暖高度敏感。实地测量结果表明,2012 年至 2023 年期间,树木的生长和密度变化极小,因此其碳储存效率保持稳定。根据激光雷达测量结果,树顶高度(TTH)大多在 5 至 12 米之间,不确定性约为 1 米。由于 OHP 遗址的树木生长缓慢,因此使用 2012 年记录的激光雷达数据来评估当前森林生物量中的碳储量是合适的。通过将实地测量与激光雷达观测结果相结合建立的等比例定律,我们发现地上生物量中的碳储量是根系中碳储量的两倍。在一个面积为 24 公顷的区域内,根据低评估和高评估,空中生物量的平均值为 15 ± 14 吨碳/公顷-1,而直径大于 1 厘米的根系的平均值为 8-10 ± 3-7 吨碳/公顷-1。这些数值在很大程度上取决于采样树木本身的高度,以及它们在 OHP 高原上(较小的树木,5-6 米)或斜坡上(最高的树木,10-12 米)的位置。采用蒙特卡罗方法计算得出,对于 5-6 米高的树木和 10-12 米高的树木,AGC 的相对不确定性分别为 17% 和 11%。对于 UGC,计算得出相同树高的相对不确定性分别为 8% 和 5%,但异速模型的假设偏差很容易达到 100%。虽然表面足迹不同,但我们的研究表明,我们的机载激光雷达测量结果与国际空间站上全球生态系统动力学调查(GEDI)任务的 2B 级(TTH)和(地上生物量)业务产品(2019 年至 2022 年期间获取的数据)之间存在合理的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impacts of modelling prescribed vs. dynamic land cover in a high-CO2 future scenario – greening of the Arctic and Amazonian dieback Linking geomorphological processes and wildlife microhabitat selection: nesting birds select refuges generated by permafrost degradation in the Arctic The biological and preformed carbon pumps in perpetually slower and warmer oceans Climate-based prediction of carbon fluxes from deadwood in Australia Composite calcite and opal test in Foraminifera (Rhizaria)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1