Addressing the Complexity of Illegal Gun Possession for Participants in Gun Diversion Programs

Q3 Social Sciences Advances in social work Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.18060/27398
Matthew W. Epperson, Alexa Cinque, Hannah Lee
{"title":"Addressing the Complexity of Illegal Gun Possession for Participants in Gun Diversion Programs","authors":"Matthew W. Epperson, Alexa Cinque, Hannah Lee","doi":"10.18060/27398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Incarceration-based approaches to illegal gun possession have not proven effective at reducing gun violence, and they have created dramatic racial disparities. Within this context, a small number of jurisdictions have developed prosecutor-led gun diversion programs (PLGDPs), which offer diversion from prosecution and an opportunity to engage in community-based services with a common goal of reducing illegal gun possession. The purpose of this paper is to explore the factors that contribute to illegal gun possession among PLGDP participants, and the extent to which PLGDP programming addresses these complex factors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 PLGDP stakeholders (8 PLGDP participants, 15 prosecutors, and 9 service providers), and qualitative analyses identified themes related to illegal gun possession and PLGDP programming connections and disconnections. Findings indicate that safety concerns related to structural issues of community violence are a primary factor driving gun possession among PLGDP participants. While PLGDPs were viewed as having some benefits, disconnects in PLGDP programming centered on assumptions made about the target population and the limitations of individual-level interventions to curb gun violence. If PLGDPs are to have an impact on gun violence, trauma-focused approaches must be incorporated, and efforts should be made to better understand and address environmental factors.","PeriodicalId":7430,"journal":{"name":"Advances in social work","volume":" 55","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/27398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Incarceration-based approaches to illegal gun possession have not proven effective at reducing gun violence, and they have created dramatic racial disparities. Within this context, a small number of jurisdictions have developed prosecutor-led gun diversion programs (PLGDPs), which offer diversion from prosecution and an opportunity to engage in community-based services with a common goal of reducing illegal gun possession. The purpose of this paper is to explore the factors that contribute to illegal gun possession among PLGDP participants, and the extent to which PLGDP programming addresses these complex factors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 PLGDP stakeholders (8 PLGDP participants, 15 prosecutors, and 9 service providers), and qualitative analyses identified themes related to illegal gun possession and PLGDP programming connections and disconnections. Findings indicate that safety concerns related to structural issues of community violence are a primary factor driving gun possession among PLGDP participants. While PLGDPs were viewed as having some benefits, disconnects in PLGDP programming centered on assumptions made about the target population and the limitations of individual-level interventions to curb gun violence. If PLGDPs are to have an impact on gun violence, trauma-focused approaches must be incorporated, and efforts should be made to better understand and address environmental factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决枪支转送计划参与者非法持有枪支问题的复杂性
:事实证明,以监禁为基础的非法持有枪支方法并不能有效减少枪支暴力,而且还造成了巨大的种族差异。在此背景下,少数司法管辖区制定了检察官主导的枪支转送计划(PLGDPs),该计划提供了免于起诉的转送机会,以及参与社区服务的机会,其共同目标是减少非法持枪。本文旨在探讨导致 PLGDP 参与者非法持枪的因素,以及 PLGDP 计划在多大程度上解决了这些复杂因素。本文对 32 名 PLGDP 利益相关者(8 名 PLGDP 参与者、15 名检察官和 9 名服务提供者)进行了半结构式访谈,并通过定性分析确定了与非法持枪和 PLGDP 计划的联系和脱节相关的主题。研究结果表明,与社区暴力结构性问题相关的安全问题是导致 PLGDP 参与者持枪的主要因素。虽然 PLGDP 被认为有一些益处,但 PLGDP 计划的脱节主要集中在对目标人群的假设以及个人层面的干预措施在遏制枪支暴力方面的局限性。如果 PLGDP 要对枪支暴力产生影响,就必须纳入以创伤为重点的方法,并应努力更好地了解和解决环境因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in social work
Advances in social work Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beyond Limits Firearm Access and Safe Storage Grassroots Activism Impacting Rural LGBTQIA+ Communities Examining the Views of Master of Social Work (MSW) Graduates on the Grand Challenges for Social Work and Society Special Section Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1