Pengaruh Pengalaman Auditor, Profesionalisme Auditor, Task Complexity, Time Pressure, Gender dan Etika Profesi Terhadap Auditor Materiality Judgments (DKI Jakarta, Indonesia)

Rudi Ginting
{"title":"Pengaruh Pengalaman Auditor, Profesionalisme Auditor, Task Complexity, Time Pressure, Gender dan Etika Profesi Terhadap Auditor Materiality Judgments (DKI Jakarta, Indonesia)","authors":"Rudi Ginting","doi":"10.30656/jak.v11i2.9007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nPublic Accounting Firms are professional institutions that are obliged to uphold ethics and professionalism, and are capable of global competition on an international and national scale.  Auditors are responsible for implementing professional standards and upholding the required provisions.  In the implementation of audited financial reports, misinformation is still found and there are even frauds in financial reports, so that it raises questions about the professionalism of Public Accountants who should provide reports that are reliable, accurate and free of material misstatement.  This debate has never been resolved, apart from involving large public accounting firms in the country and abroad. This research aims to examine the impact of experience, professionalism, complexity, pressure, gender and ethics on the auditor's assessment of materiality in audited financial reports. The research population is registered auditors at the Indonesian Institute of Public Accountants (IAPI) in the DKI Jakarta area. The simple random sampling method was used to select samples, distribute questionnaires to auditors who work at Public Accounting Firms (KAP) in the area. A total of 80 auditors filled out and returned the questionnaire as a sample. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression with SPSS software, and tested the hypotheses in this research. \nExamination of the data shows that experience, professionalism, complexity, pressure and gender influence the consideration of materiality levels in financial reports. Meanwhile, professional ethics has no impact or influence on the consideration of the level of materiality in financial reports. \nKeywords: Experience, Professionalism, Task Complexity, Time Pressure, Gender, Professional Ethics, Materiality","PeriodicalId":383983,"journal":{"name":"JAK (Jurnal Akuntansi) Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi","volume":" 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAK (Jurnal Akuntansi) Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30656/jak.v11i2.9007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Public Accounting Firms are professional institutions that are obliged to uphold ethics and professionalism, and are capable of global competition on an international and national scale.  Auditors are responsible for implementing professional standards and upholding the required provisions.  In the implementation of audited financial reports, misinformation is still found and there are even frauds in financial reports, so that it raises questions about the professionalism of Public Accountants who should provide reports that are reliable, accurate and free of material misstatement.  This debate has never been resolved, apart from involving large public accounting firms in the country and abroad. This research aims to examine the impact of experience, professionalism, complexity, pressure, gender and ethics on the auditor's assessment of materiality in audited financial reports. The research population is registered auditors at the Indonesian Institute of Public Accountants (IAPI) in the DKI Jakarta area. The simple random sampling method was used to select samples, distribute questionnaires to auditors who work at Public Accounting Firms (KAP) in the area. A total of 80 auditors filled out and returned the questionnaire as a sample. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression with SPSS software, and tested the hypotheses in this research. Examination of the data shows that experience, professionalism, complexity, pressure and gender influence the consideration of materiality levels in financial reports. Meanwhile, professional ethics has no impact or influence on the consideration of the level of materiality in financial reports. Keywords: Experience, Professionalism, Task Complexity, Time Pressure, Gender, Professional Ethics, Materiality
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审计师经验、审计师职业精神、任务复杂性、时间压力、性别和职业道德对审计师重要性判断的影响(印度尼西亚雅加达,DKI)
摘要 公共会计师事务所是专业机构,有义务维护职业道德和专业精神,能够在国际和国内范围内进行全球竞争。 审计师有责任执行专业标准,坚持必要的规定。 在执行经审计的财务报告的过程中,仍然会发现财务报告中的错误信息,甚至存在欺诈行为,这就对公共会计师的专业性提出了质疑,因为公共会计师应提供可靠、准确、无重大错报的报告。 除了国内外的大型公共会计师事务所外,这一争论一直没有得到解决。本研究旨在探讨经验、专业性、复杂性、压力、性别和职业道德对审计师评估已审计财务报告重要性的影响。研究对象为印尼公共会计师协会(IAPI)在雅加达 DKI 地区的注册审计师。研究采用简单随机抽样法选取样本,并向该地区公共会计师事务所(KAP)的审计师发放调查问卷。作为样本,共有 80 名审计师填写并交回了问卷。使用 SPSS 软件对数据进行了多元线性回归分析,并检验了本研究的假设。研究数据显示,经验、专业性、复杂性、压力和性别会影响对财务报告重要性水平的考虑。同时,职业道德对财务报告重要性水平的考虑没有影响或影响不大。关键词经验 专业性 任务复杂性 时间压力 性别 职业道德 重要性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role Of Green Culture In Generating Sustainable Economic Performance And Increasing Post-Pandemic Stock Prices Healthcare Sector In Indonesia And Singapore Business Strategy, Multinational Companies, Integrated Reporting, and Tax Avoidance Analisis Akuntansi Biaya Lingkungan Industri Kimia Di Kota Cilegon Sebagai Wujud Implementasi dari Green Accounting The Effect Of Political Connections, Transfer Pricing, and Firm Size On Tax Avoidance Practices Persepsi Auditor Eksternal Atas Pengaruh Kemudahan dan Kegunaan Artificial Intelligence Terhadap Kualitas Audit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1