P. Korambayil, Hemang Arvind Sanghvi, V. Dilliraj, P. Ambookan
{"title":"Evaluating Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy to Improve Single-Stage Dermal Substitute and Skin Grafting: A Comparative Study","authors":"P. Korambayil, Hemang Arvind Sanghvi, V. Dilliraj, P. Ambookan","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background Dermal substitutes offer a valuable tool in soft-tissue reconstruction, reducing the need for donor site tissue and its associated complications. However, conventional approaches often require multiple surgeries. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a single-stage procedure combining dermal substitute and skin grafting with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy to the standard multistage protocol.\n Materials and Methods A comparative study was conducted from January 2022 to December 2023. The medical records of 24 patients who underwent soft-tissue reconstruction were reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on whether they received HBO therapy (HBO group) or followed the standard multistage protocol (control group). Outcomes were compared between the groups.\n Results The study included 18 males and 6 females with an average age of 43 years (range: 5–91 years). Underlying medical conditions included diabetes mellitus (n = 11) and peripheral vascular disease (n = 2). Wounds were due to various causes, including necrotizing fasciitis (n = 2), trauma (n = 10), diabetic ulcers (n = 6), postburn hypertrophic scars/contractures (n = 3), chronic ulcers (n = 1), and sternal wound dehiscence (n = 1). All the patients achieved successful wound closure with dermal substitute application, eliminating the need for additional surgery. Notably, the group receiving HBO therapy experienced a shorter overall hospital stay compared with the standard multistage group.\n Conclusion This study demonstrates the effectiveness of dermal substitutes in soft-tissue reconstruction. Furthermore, the addition of HBO therapy in a single-stage procedure appears beneficial for successful outcomes, potentially reducing hospital stay compared with the traditional multistage approach.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Dermal substitutes offer a valuable tool in soft-tissue reconstruction, reducing the need for donor site tissue and its associated complications. However, conventional approaches often require multiple surgeries. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a single-stage procedure combining dermal substitute and skin grafting with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy to the standard multistage protocol.
Materials and Methods A comparative study was conducted from January 2022 to December 2023. The medical records of 24 patients who underwent soft-tissue reconstruction were reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on whether they received HBO therapy (HBO group) or followed the standard multistage protocol (control group). Outcomes were compared between the groups.
Results The study included 18 males and 6 females with an average age of 43 years (range: 5–91 years). Underlying medical conditions included diabetes mellitus (n = 11) and peripheral vascular disease (n = 2). Wounds were due to various causes, including necrotizing fasciitis (n = 2), trauma (n = 10), diabetic ulcers (n = 6), postburn hypertrophic scars/contractures (n = 3), chronic ulcers (n = 1), and sternal wound dehiscence (n = 1). All the patients achieved successful wound closure with dermal substitute application, eliminating the need for additional surgery. Notably, the group receiving HBO therapy experienced a shorter overall hospital stay compared with the standard multistage group.
Conclusion This study demonstrates the effectiveness of dermal substitutes in soft-tissue reconstruction. Furthermore, the addition of HBO therapy in a single-stage procedure appears beneficial for successful outcomes, potentially reducing hospital stay compared with the traditional multistage approach.