Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) effects on lung health: a perspective on the current literature and future recommendations

IF 3.6 Q2 TOXICOLOGY Frontiers in toxicology Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.3389/ftox.2024.1423449
Megan E. Solan, Jin-Ah Park
{"title":"Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) effects on lung health: a perspective on the current literature and future recommendations","authors":"Megan E. Solan, Jin-Ah Park","doi":"10.3389/ftox.2024.1423449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a broad class of synthetic compounds widely used in commercial applications. The persistent nature of PFAS in the environment has earned them the epithet “forever chemicals.” Concerns arise from widespread exposure to PFAS from occupational, household, and environmental sources. This widespread use of PFAS is particularly concerning, as emerging epidemiological evidence highlights their adverse effects on lung health. Such adverse impacts include impaired fetal lung development, reduced immune function in children, and potential links to lung cancer. Both in vivo and in vitro studies illuminate potential mechanisms underlying such adverse health outcomes subsequent to PFAS inhalation exposure, which may include immunomodulation, oxidative stress, and disruptions to epithelial barriers. However, evidence-based information focusing on the mechanisms of PFAS-mediated lung injury is lacking. Additionally, the discrepancies between data collected from animal and epidemiological studies highlight the need for improved approaches to better understand the toxicity results of PFAS exposure. To address these gaps, we recommend leveraging route-to-route extrapolation for risk assessment, prioritizing research on understudied PFAS, and adopting physiologically relevant, high-throughput approaches. These strategies are aimed at enhancing our understanding of PFAS inhalation effects, aiding in more informed risk management decisions. In this review, we summarize the current literature on PFAS exposure, emphasizing its adverse effects on lung health, particularly through inhalation. We then discuss the current knowledge on mechanisms underlying tissue- and cellular-level adverse outcomes caused by PFAS.","PeriodicalId":73111,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2024.1423449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a broad class of synthetic compounds widely used in commercial applications. The persistent nature of PFAS in the environment has earned them the epithet “forever chemicals.” Concerns arise from widespread exposure to PFAS from occupational, household, and environmental sources. This widespread use of PFAS is particularly concerning, as emerging epidemiological evidence highlights their adverse effects on lung health. Such adverse impacts include impaired fetal lung development, reduced immune function in children, and potential links to lung cancer. Both in vivo and in vitro studies illuminate potential mechanisms underlying such adverse health outcomes subsequent to PFAS inhalation exposure, which may include immunomodulation, oxidative stress, and disruptions to epithelial barriers. However, evidence-based information focusing on the mechanisms of PFAS-mediated lung injury is lacking. Additionally, the discrepancies between data collected from animal and epidemiological studies highlight the need for improved approaches to better understand the toxicity results of PFAS exposure. To address these gaps, we recommend leveraging route-to-route extrapolation for risk assessment, prioritizing research on understudied PFAS, and adopting physiologically relevant, high-throughput approaches. These strategies are aimed at enhancing our understanding of PFAS inhalation effects, aiding in more informed risk management decisions. In this review, we summarize the current literature on PFAS exposure, emphasizing its adverse effects on lung health, particularly through inhalation. We then discuss the current knowledge on mechanisms underlying tissue- and cellular-level adverse outcomes caused by PFAS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质 (PFAS) 对肺部健康的影响:现有文献透视与未来建议
全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是广泛应用于商业领域的一大类合成化合物。PFAS 在环境中的持久性使其被称为 "永远的化学品"。职业、家庭和环境中广泛接触 PFAS 引发了人们的担忧。PFAS 的广泛使用尤其令人担忧,因为新出现的流行病学证据突显了它们对肺部健康的不利影响。这些不利影响包括胎儿肺部发育受损、儿童免疫功能下降以及与肺癌的潜在联系。体内和体外研究都揭示了吸入 PFAS 后产生此类不良健康后果的潜在机制,其中可能包括免疫调节、氧化应激和上皮屏障破坏。然而,目前还缺乏有关全氟辛烷磺酸介导的肺损伤机制的循证信息。此外,从动物实验和流行病学研究中收集到的数据之间存在差异,这突出表明需要改进方法,以更好地了解接触 PFAS 后的毒性结果。为了弥补这些差距,我们建议利用路径外推法进行风险评估,优先研究未充分研究的 PFAS,并采用与生理相关的高通量方法。这些策略旨在加强我们对全氟辛烷磺酸吸入效应的了解,帮助我们做出更明智的风险管理决定。在这篇综述中,我们总结了目前有关 PFAS 暴露的文献,强调了它对肺部健康的不利影响,尤其是通过吸入产生的影响。然后,我们讨论了目前有关全氟辛烷磺酸在组织和细胞层面造成不良后果的机制的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
A new approach methodology to identify tumorigenic chemicals using short-term exposures and transcript profiling. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of triclosan exposure on human semen quality. Reproductive toxicology: keeping up with our changing world. Microplastics and nanoplastics in cardiovascular disease-a narrative review with worrying links. Ergot alkaloid control in biotechnological processes and pharmaceuticals (a mini review).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1