Single-Portal Arthroscopy Improves the Assessment of Radial-sided Disorders of the Wrist

Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1788294
R. Luchetti, Sara Montanari, L. Marcovici, R. Cozzolino, Sanjeev Kakar, A. Atzei
{"title":"Single-Portal Arthroscopy Improves the Assessment of Radial-sided Disorders of the Wrist","authors":"R. Luchetti, Sara Montanari, L. Marcovici, R. Cozzolino, Sanjeev Kakar, A. Atzei","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Purpose This study aimed to describe the technique, indications, and advantages of the single-portal arthroscopic approach for the diagnosis and staging of chronic radial-sided disorders, including scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) tear, scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) deformities.\n Methods The single portal technique was used in 138 patients affected by suspected SLIL lesions, SLAC and SNAC wrist injuries with positive clinical symptoms and inconclusive imaging (X-ray and MRI). It was used to grade the nature of the SLIL lesion and the extension of the osteochondral damage in the SLAC and SNAC wrist deformity to guide appropriate treatment.\n Results Patients were divided into group 1 (SLIL: 45 cases), group 2a (SLAC: 65 cases), and group 2b (SNAC: 28 cases). In group 1, stage 4 SLIL lesions were confirmed in 36 cases and 9 were assessed as SLAC wrist deformity. In group 2a, single-portal arthroscopy confirmed the preoperative diagnosis in 74% of cases. In the remaining 26% of patients, arthroscopy modified the preoperative diagnosis: 1 case of SLAC 1 resulted in SLAC 2, 14 cases of SLAC 2 resulted in SLAC 3, 1 case of SLAC 3 resulted in SLAC 2. A case of SLAC 2 turned out to be an SLIL lesion stage 4. In group 2b, single-portal arthroscopy confirmed the preoperative diagnosis in 86% of cases. In the remaining 14% (4 cases), it modified the preoperative diagnosis: 1 of SNAC 1 resulted in SNAC 2 and the other in SNAC 3, 1 case of SNAC 2 turned out to be an SNAC 3, and 1 case of SNAC 3 resulted in SNAC 4.\n Conclusion Single-portal wrist arthroscopy modified the preoperative diagnosis of wrist pathology in 42 patients over 138 cases. The use of single-portal wrist arthroscopy should be considered in the evaluation of the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints to allow accurate visualization of the joint surfaces for surgeon and patient planning.\n Type of Study/Level of Evidence Observational study level of evidence IV.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to describe the technique, indications, and advantages of the single-portal arthroscopic approach for the diagnosis and staging of chronic radial-sided disorders, including scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) tear, scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) deformities. Methods The single portal technique was used in 138 patients affected by suspected SLIL lesions, SLAC and SNAC wrist injuries with positive clinical symptoms and inconclusive imaging (X-ray and MRI). It was used to grade the nature of the SLIL lesion and the extension of the osteochondral damage in the SLAC and SNAC wrist deformity to guide appropriate treatment. Results Patients were divided into group 1 (SLIL: 45 cases), group 2a (SLAC: 65 cases), and group 2b (SNAC: 28 cases). In group 1, stage 4 SLIL lesions were confirmed in 36 cases and 9 were assessed as SLAC wrist deformity. In group 2a, single-portal arthroscopy confirmed the preoperative diagnosis in 74% of cases. In the remaining 26% of patients, arthroscopy modified the preoperative diagnosis: 1 case of SLAC 1 resulted in SLAC 2, 14 cases of SLAC 2 resulted in SLAC 3, 1 case of SLAC 3 resulted in SLAC 2. A case of SLAC 2 turned out to be an SLIL lesion stage 4. In group 2b, single-portal arthroscopy confirmed the preoperative diagnosis in 86% of cases. In the remaining 14% (4 cases), it modified the preoperative diagnosis: 1 of SNAC 1 resulted in SNAC 2 and the other in SNAC 3, 1 case of SNAC 2 turned out to be an SNAC 3, and 1 case of SNAC 3 resulted in SNAC 4. Conclusion Single-portal wrist arthroscopy modified the preoperative diagnosis of wrist pathology in 42 patients over 138 cases. The use of single-portal wrist arthroscopy should be considered in the evaluation of the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints to allow accurate visualization of the joint surfaces for surgeon and patient planning. Type of Study/Level of Evidence Observational study level of evidence IV.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
单孔关节镜改进了对腕部桡侧疾病的评估
目的 本研究旨在描述用于诊断和分期慢性桡侧疾病(包括肩胛骨骨间韧带(SLIL)撕裂、肩胛骨晚期塌陷(SLAC)和肩胛骨未接合晚期塌陷(SNAC)畸形)的单入口关节镜方法的技术、适应症和优势。方法 对 138 名临床症状阳性但影像学(X 光和核磁共振成像)结果不确定的疑似 SLIL 病变、SLAC 和 SNAC 腕关节损伤患者采用单入口技术。该方法用于对 SLIL 病变的性质以及 SLAC 和 SNAC 腕关节畸形中骨软骨损伤的扩展程度进行分级,以指导适当的治疗。结果 患者被分为第1组(SLIL:45例)、第2a组(SLAC:65例)和第2b组(SNAC:28例)。在第 1 组中,36 例确诊为 SLIL 病变 4 期,9 例被评估为 SLAC 腕部畸形。在 2a 组中,74% 的病例通过单孔关节镜确诊为术前病变。在其余 26% 的患者中,关节镜检查改变了术前诊断:1 例 SLAC 1 结果为 SLAC 2,14 例 SLAC 2 结果为 SLAC 3,1 例 SLAC 3 结果为 SLAC 2。1 例 SLAC 2 结果为 SLIL 病变 4 期。在第 2b 组中,86% 的病例通过单孔关节镜证实了术前诊断。其余 14% 的病例(4 例)改变了术前诊断:1 例 SNAC 1 结果为 SNAC 2,另 1 例为 SNAC 3,1 例 SNAC 2 结果为 SNAC 3,1 例 SNAC 3 结果为 SNAC 4。结论 单孔腕关节镜改变了 138 例患者中 42 例患者的术前腕部病理诊断。在评估桡腕关节和中腕关节时应考虑使用单孔腕关节镜,以便准确观察关节表面,为外科医生和患者制定计划。研究类型/证据级别 观察性研究证据级别 IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1