{"title":"Effect of tempeh wrapping on sensory evaluation and lactic acid bacteria profile","authors":"S. Magdalena, N.A. Surya, Y. Yogiara","doi":"10.26656/fr.2017.8(4).351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tempeh is a fermented food made from soybeans and consumed daily due to its delicious\nflavour and high nutritional value. Traditionally, tempeh is wrapped in banana leaf, but\nnowadays, tempeh wrappers are often replaced with plastic because it is cheap and\npractical. However, high plastic utilization in daily life results in waste accumulation and\ncauses environmental issues. Therefore, different types of leaves were explored as\nwrapping alternatives to reduce plastic utilization. This study aimed to determine the\nsensory characteristics of tempeh made with various wrappers and the lactic acid bacteria\n(LAB) characteristics of each tempeh. In this study, tempeh was wrapped in a teak leaf,\nbamboo leaf, lotus leaf, coconut leaf and plastic. Enumeration of total viable bacteria and\nLAB were not significantly different for all variants of the tempeh, except for the lotus\nleaf variant, which had a significantly lower number of LAB. The teak and coconut leaf\nvariant tempeh were acceptable to panellists in the sensory evaluation test. The most\npreferred variant was the plastic-wrapped variant which had no significant difference from\ncommercial tempeh. All LAB from the five types of tempeh were isolated to evaluate their\nhaemolytic activity and antibiotic resistance. The result showed that all isolates exhibited\nnegative haemolytic activity (gamma haemolysis). Most isolates (90.8%) were susceptible\nto chloramphenicol, while 80.3% of the isolates were resistant to vancomycin. The five\nisolates with the best characteristics were identified using the 16S rRNA gene. They were\nidentified as Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus gallinarum and Staphylococcus\nxylosus.","PeriodicalId":502485,"journal":{"name":"Food Research","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.8(4).351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tempeh is a fermented food made from soybeans and consumed daily due to its delicious
flavour and high nutritional value. Traditionally, tempeh is wrapped in banana leaf, but
nowadays, tempeh wrappers are often replaced with plastic because it is cheap and
practical. However, high plastic utilization in daily life results in waste accumulation and
causes environmental issues. Therefore, different types of leaves were explored as
wrapping alternatives to reduce plastic utilization. This study aimed to determine the
sensory characteristics of tempeh made with various wrappers and the lactic acid bacteria
(LAB) characteristics of each tempeh. In this study, tempeh was wrapped in a teak leaf,
bamboo leaf, lotus leaf, coconut leaf and plastic. Enumeration of total viable bacteria and
LAB were not significantly different for all variants of the tempeh, except for the lotus
leaf variant, which had a significantly lower number of LAB. The teak and coconut leaf
variant tempeh were acceptable to panellists in the sensory evaluation test. The most
preferred variant was the plastic-wrapped variant which had no significant difference from
commercial tempeh. All LAB from the five types of tempeh were isolated to evaluate their
haemolytic activity and antibiotic resistance. The result showed that all isolates exhibited
negative haemolytic activity (gamma haemolysis). Most isolates (90.8%) were susceptible
to chloramphenicol, while 80.3% of the isolates were resistant to vancomycin. The five
isolates with the best characteristics were identified using the 16S rRNA gene. They were
identified as Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus gallinarum and Staphylococcus
xylosus.