Comparison Efficacy of Phenobarbital versus Levetiracetam in Acute Neonatal Seizures: A Randomized Control Trial

Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1788054
Alireza Saadati, Narges Kalhor, Sara Afshari, Masoud Hassanvand Amouzadeh, Mansoreh Saffari, Mohsen Mollamohamadi
{"title":"Comparison Efficacy of Phenobarbital versus Levetiracetam in Acute Neonatal Seizures: A Randomized Control Trial","authors":"Alireza Saadati, Narges Kalhor, Sara Afshari, Masoud Hassanvand Amouzadeh, Mansoreh Saffari, Mohsen Mollamohamadi","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seizures in infancy are one of the main manifestations of disorders in the central nervous system that can have important etiologies. The development of anticonvulsant drugs and the importance of drug selection in infants, due to more complex underlying etiologies, compared with older ages, explicate the essentiality of executing clinical investigations to appraise the optimal therapeutic approach. The objective of the current investigation is to juxtapose two therapeutic approaches involving intravenous levetiracetam and intravenous phenobarbital in the management of neonatal seizures. This is a randomized controlled clinical trial study on 100 infants who were referred to the Hazrat Masoumeh (S) Hospital in Qom owing to convulsions. Infants with seizure who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were arbitrarily allocated to one of the two intervention cohorts: intravenous levetiracetam or intravenous phenobarbital, and therapeutic responses were compared. There was a substantial relationship between seizure time, seizure etiology, anticonvulsant therapy type, and treatment responsiveness. As a result, the risks of not responding to therapy and increasing the dose were approximately 6 and 5 times higher, respectively, in the group that experienced seizures in the fourth week than in the other groups. Infants with cerebrovascular anomalies were more prone to not responding to treatment. Furthermore, children administered phenobarbital had a 2.5-fold higher chance of not responding to treatment than those given levetiracetam (p = 0.043).","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seizures in infancy are one of the main manifestations of disorders in the central nervous system that can have important etiologies. The development of anticonvulsant drugs and the importance of drug selection in infants, due to more complex underlying etiologies, compared with older ages, explicate the essentiality of executing clinical investigations to appraise the optimal therapeutic approach. The objective of the current investigation is to juxtapose two therapeutic approaches involving intravenous levetiracetam and intravenous phenobarbital in the management of neonatal seizures. This is a randomized controlled clinical trial study on 100 infants who were referred to the Hazrat Masoumeh (S) Hospital in Qom owing to convulsions. Infants with seizure who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were arbitrarily allocated to one of the two intervention cohorts: intravenous levetiracetam or intravenous phenobarbital, and therapeutic responses were compared. There was a substantial relationship between seizure time, seizure etiology, anticonvulsant therapy type, and treatment responsiveness. As a result, the risks of not responding to therapy and increasing the dose were approximately 6 and 5 times higher, respectively, in the group that experienced seizures in the fourth week than in the other groups. Infants with cerebrovascular anomalies were more prone to not responding to treatment. Furthermore, children administered phenobarbital had a 2.5-fold higher chance of not responding to treatment than those given levetiracetam (p = 0.043).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
苯巴比妥与左乙拉西坦对新生儿急性癫痫发作的疗效比较:随机对照试验
婴儿期癫痫发作是中枢神经系统紊乱的主要表现之一,其病因可能十分复杂。随着抗惊厥药物的发展,以及与年龄较大的患者相比,由于潜在病因更为复杂,婴儿药物选择的重要性日益凸显,因此,开展临床研究以评估最佳治疗方法至关重要。本次研究的目的是将静脉注射左乙拉西坦和静脉注射苯巴比妥两种治疗方法并列用于新生儿癫痫发作的治疗。这是一项随机对照临床试验研究,研究对象是因抽搐而转诊到库姆 Hazrat Masoumeh (S) 医院的 100 名婴儿。符合纳入标准的癫痫发作婴儿被任意分配到两个干预组中的一个:静脉注射左乙拉西坦或静脉注射苯巴比妥,并对治疗反应进行比较。癫痫发作时间、癫痫发作病因、抗惊厥治疗类型和治疗反应之间存在密切关系。因此,在第四周出现癫痫发作的组别中,对治疗无反应和增加剂量的风险分别比其他组别高出约 6 倍和 5 倍。脑血管异常的婴儿更容易对治疗无反应。此外,与服用左乙拉西坦的婴儿相比,服用苯巴比妥的婴儿对治疗无反应的几率要高出2.5倍(p = 0.043)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1