Modeling relationships among large-grained, fine-grained absolute syntactic complexity and assessed L2 writing quality: An SEM approach

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Assessing Writing Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100875
Yuxin Peng , Yafu Zheng , Jie Sun , Yue Jiang , Jiexin Lin , Haomin Zhang
{"title":"Modeling relationships among large-grained, fine-grained absolute syntactic complexity and assessed L2 writing quality: An SEM approach","authors":"Yuxin Peng ,&nbsp;Yafu Zheng ,&nbsp;Jie Sun ,&nbsp;Yue Jiang ,&nbsp;Jiexin Lin ,&nbsp;Haomin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2024.100875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current study investigated the relationships among large-grained and fine-grained aspects of absolute syntactic complexity (SC) and expert-assessed writing quality of 446 argumentative writing samples of college-level Chinese EFL learners. Computational indices tapping into large-grained and fine-grained aspects of absolute SC were computed by TAASSC and L2SCA. Drawing upon rigorous SEM analyses, this paper demonstrated the utility of computational indices that tap into absolute SC. Overall, the measurements of absolute SC accounted for 42 % of the variance in human-judged overall writing scores. The results revealed that (1) noun phrase (NP) complexity was the underlying cause that determined trained raters’ judgement on argumentative writing quality; (2) among traditional large-grained indices, MLC, CN/C, and CN/T, were dependable metrics in representing SC and predicting writing quality; (3) among fine-grained indices, prepositional phrases and relative clauses as noun modifiers were prominent in representing NP complexity; (4) relative clause and adjectival modifiers had unique and complementary effects to large-grained NP complexity in affording explanations for human judgement; (5) the use of prepositions in NP was the most prominent contributor to the increase of large-grained NP complexity among the noun phrase modifiers in this specific corpus. Situated in previous research, the results provide an opportunity to evaluate L2 writing within the theoretical framework of absolute syntactic complexity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293524000680","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study investigated the relationships among large-grained and fine-grained aspects of absolute syntactic complexity (SC) and expert-assessed writing quality of 446 argumentative writing samples of college-level Chinese EFL learners. Computational indices tapping into large-grained and fine-grained aspects of absolute SC were computed by TAASSC and L2SCA. Drawing upon rigorous SEM analyses, this paper demonstrated the utility of computational indices that tap into absolute SC. Overall, the measurements of absolute SC accounted for 42 % of the variance in human-judged overall writing scores. The results revealed that (1) noun phrase (NP) complexity was the underlying cause that determined trained raters’ judgement on argumentative writing quality; (2) among traditional large-grained indices, MLC, CN/C, and CN/T, were dependable metrics in representing SC and predicting writing quality; (3) among fine-grained indices, prepositional phrases and relative clauses as noun modifiers were prominent in representing NP complexity; (4) relative clause and adjectival modifiers had unique and complementary effects to large-grained NP complexity in affording explanations for human judgement; (5) the use of prepositions in NP was the most prominent contributor to the increase of large-grained NP complexity among the noun phrase modifiers in this specific corpus. Situated in previous research, the results provide an opportunity to evaluate L2 writing within the theoretical framework of absolute syntactic complexity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立大粒度、细粒度绝对句法复杂性与 L2 写作质量评估之间的关系模型:SEM 方法
本研究探讨了绝对句法复杂度(SC)的大粒度和细粒度方面与专家评估的 446 篇中国大学水平 EFL 学习者议论文写作质量之间的关系。TAASSC和L2SCA计算了绝对句法复杂度的大粒度和细粒度方面的计算指数。通过严格的 SEM 分析,本文证明了绝对 SC 计算指数的实用性。总体而言,绝对 SC 的测量结果占人类评判的写作总分差异的 42%。研究结果表明:(1)名词短语(NP)的复杂性是决定训练有素的评分者对议论文写作质量做出判断的根本原因;(2)在传统的大粒度指数中,MLC、CN/C 和 CN/T 是代表 SC 和预测写作质量的可靠指标;(3)在细粒度指数中,介词短语和作为名词修饰语的相对从句在代表 NP 复杂性方面表现突出;(4) 相对从句和形容词修饰语在为人类判断提供解释方面与大粒度 NP 复杂性具有独特的互补作用;(5) 在该特定语料库中,介词在 NP 中的使用是增加大粒度 NP 复杂性的最主要原因。从以往的研究来看,这些结果为在绝对句法复杂性的理论框架内评估 L2 写作提供了一个机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assessing Writing
Assessing Writing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of voice in Chinese English-major undergraduates’ timed and untimed argument writing The impact of task duration on the scoring of independent writing responses of adult L2-English writers A structural equation investigation of linguistic features as indices of writing quality in assessed secondary-level EMI learners’ scientific reports Validating an integrated reading-into-writing scale with trained university students Understanding the SSARC model of task sequencing: Assessing L2 writing development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1