Assessing the importance of risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Results from the classification and regression tree models

IF 1.9 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Family and Community Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_354_23
Ziyang Zhang, Deliang Lv, Yueyue You, Zhiguang Zhao, Wei Hu, Fengzhu Xie, Yali Lin, Wei Xie, Xiaobing Wu
{"title":"Assessing the importance of risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Results from the classification and regression tree models","authors":"Ziyang Zhang, Deliang Lv, Yueyue You, Zhiguang Zhao, Wei Hu, Fengzhu Xie, Yali Lin, Wei Xie, Xiaobing Wu","doi":"10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_354_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the serious complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). Many studies have identified the risk factors associated with DR, but there is not much evidence on the importance of these factors for DR. This study aimed to investigate the associated factors for patients with type 2 DM (T2DM) and calculate the importance of the identified factors.\n \n \n \n Using probability proportionate to size sampling method in this community-based cross-sectional study, 22 community health service centers were selected from 10 administrative districts in Shenzhen, China. Approximately 60 T2DM patients were recruited from each center. The participants completed a structural questionnaire, had their venous blood collected, and underwent medical examinations and fundus photography. Logistic regression models were used to identify the risk factors of DR. The classification and regression tree (CART) model was used to calculate the importance of the identified risk factors.\n \n \n \n This study recruited 1097 T2DM patients, 266 of whom were identified as having DR, yielding a prevalence rate of 24.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.7%–26.9%). Results showed that a longer duration of DM, indoor-type lifestyle, and higher levels of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or urea increased the risk of DR. Patients with HbA1c values ≥7% were about 2.45 times (odds ratio: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.83–3.29) more likely to have DR than their counterparts. The CART model found that the values of variable importance for HbA1c, DM duration, lifestyle (i.e., indoor type), and urea were 48%, 37%, 10%, and 4%, respectively.\n \n \n \n The prevalence of DR is high for T2DM patients who receive DM health management services from the primary healthcare system. HbA1c is the most important risk factor for DR. Integration of DR screening and HbA1c testing into the healthcare services for T2DM to reduce vision impairment and blindness is urgently warranted.\n","PeriodicalId":46862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family and Community Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family and Community Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_354_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the serious complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). Many studies have identified the risk factors associated with DR, but there is not much evidence on the importance of these factors for DR. This study aimed to investigate the associated factors for patients with type 2 DM (T2DM) and calculate the importance of the identified factors. Using probability proportionate to size sampling method in this community-based cross-sectional study, 22 community health service centers were selected from 10 administrative districts in Shenzhen, China. Approximately 60 T2DM patients were recruited from each center. The participants completed a structural questionnaire, had their venous blood collected, and underwent medical examinations and fundus photography. Logistic regression models were used to identify the risk factors of DR. The classification and regression tree (CART) model was used to calculate the importance of the identified risk factors. This study recruited 1097 T2DM patients, 266 of whom were identified as having DR, yielding a prevalence rate of 24.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.7%–26.9%). Results showed that a longer duration of DM, indoor-type lifestyle, and higher levels of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or urea increased the risk of DR. Patients with HbA1c values ≥7% were about 2.45 times (odds ratio: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.83–3.29) more likely to have DR than their counterparts. The CART model found that the values of variable importance for HbA1c, DM duration, lifestyle (i.e., indoor type), and urea were 48%, 37%, 10%, and 4%, respectively. The prevalence of DR is high for T2DM patients who receive DM health management services from the primary healthcare system. HbA1c is the most important risk factor for DR. Integration of DR screening and HbA1c testing into the healthcare services for T2DM to reduce vision impairment and blindness is urgently warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病视网膜病变风险因素的重要性:分类和回归树模型的结果
糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是糖尿病(DM)的严重并发症之一。许多研究已经确定了与糖尿病视网膜病变相关的风险因素,但关于这些因素对糖尿病视网膜病变重要性的证据并不多。本研究旨在调查 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的相关因素,并计算已确定因素的重要性。 在这项以社区为基础的横断面研究中,采用概率比例抽样法,从中国深圳的 10 个行政区中选取了 22 个社区卫生服务中心。每个中心招募了约 60 名 T2DM 患者。参与者填写了结构性问卷,采集了静脉血,接受了体检和眼底照相。采用逻辑回归模型确定 DR 的风险因素。分类和回归树(CART)模型用于计算已识别风险因素的重要性。 该研究共招募了 1097 名 T2DM 患者,其中 266 人被确定患有 DR,患病率为 24.3%(95% 置信区间 [CI]:21.7%-26.9%)。结果显示,糖尿病病程越长、室内型生活方式、血红蛋白 A1c (HbA1c) 或尿素水平越高,患 DR 的风险就越大。HbA1c值≥7%的患者患DR的几率是同类患者的约2.45倍(几率比:2.45;95% CI:1.83-3.29)。CART 模型发现,HbA1c、DM 持续时间、生活方式(即室内类型)和尿素的变量重要性值分别为 48%、37%、10% 和 4%。 在接受初级医疗系统提供的糖尿病健康管理服务的 T2DM 患者中,DR 的患病率很高。HbA1c 是导致 DR 的最重要风险因素。当务之急是将 DR 筛查和 HbA1c 检测纳入 T2DM 的医疗保健服务,以减少视力损伤和失明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family and Community Medicine
Journal of Family and Community Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊最新文献
Self-prescription with psychotropic medications by healthcare professionals working at mental health institutions in Saudi Arabia Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31 for the diagnosis of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in long-term coronavirus disease 2019 Assessing the importance of risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Results from the classification and regression tree models The effect of patients’ empowerment on satisfaction of diabetic patients attending primary care clinics Willingness and self-confidence of healthcare workers in Bahrain in assisting with in-flight emergencies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1