Investigating the implementation of a complex intervention to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, using Normalisation Process Theory
Victoria Payne , Mark J Johnson , Katherine Hunt , Jacqui Prieto
{"title":"Investigating the implementation of a complex intervention to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, using Normalisation Process Theory","authors":"Victoria Payne , Mark J Johnson , Katherine Hunt , Jacqui Prieto","doi":"10.1016/j.jnn.2024.07.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Care bundles may reduce neonatal CLABSIs by 60% though it is often unclear if it is the intervention, the implementation, or both, that results in CLABSI reductions. This study aimed to investigate the implementation of a CLABSI care bundle in a UK neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A focused ethnographic design was used underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory. Data collection included Normalisation MeAsure Development (NoMAD) surveys, observations of practice with dyadic think aloud interviews, and semi-structured interviews. Outcome and processes measures were collected. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was only partial bundle implementation, with minimal changes in survey scores and influences across individual, team and organisational levels moderating bundle adoption. Organisational culture sometimes undermined implementation and there were challenges relating to reinforcement and endorsement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The introduction of a care bundle into a tertiary UK NICU did not result in sustained reductions in CLABSIs, which is one of few negative studies. Understanding the mechanisms by which an intervention works (or not) in specific contexts is important to optimise the delivery of evidence-based care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35482,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neonatal Nursing","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 186-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355184124001662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Care bundles may reduce neonatal CLABSIs by 60% though it is often unclear if it is the intervention, the implementation, or both, that results in CLABSI reductions. This study aimed to investigate the implementation of a CLABSI care bundle in a UK neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
Methods
A focused ethnographic design was used underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory. Data collection included Normalisation MeAsure Development (NoMAD) surveys, observations of practice with dyadic think aloud interviews, and semi-structured interviews. Outcome and processes measures were collected. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.
Results
There was only partial bundle implementation, with minimal changes in survey scores and influences across individual, team and organisational levels moderating bundle adoption. Organisational culture sometimes undermined implementation and there were challenges relating to reinforcement and endorsement.
Conclusions
The introduction of a care bundle into a tertiary UK NICU did not result in sustained reductions in CLABSIs, which is one of few negative studies. Understanding the mechanisms by which an intervention works (or not) in specific contexts is important to optimise the delivery of evidence-based care.
背景:护理包可使新生儿CLABSI降低60%,但通常不清楚是干预、实施还是两者兼有导致CLABSI降低。本研究旨在调查CLABSI护理包在英国新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的实施情况。方法采用规范化过程理论为基础的重点人种学设计。数据收集包括Normalisation MeAsure Development (NoMAD)调查、二元思考访谈和半结构化访谈的实践观察。收集了结果和过程测量值。数据分析采用描述性统计和专题分析。结果只有部分捆绑实施,调查得分和个人、团队和组织层面的影响变化最小,减缓了捆绑的采用。组织文化有时会破坏执行,并且存在与强化和认可有关的挑战。结论:在英国第三级NICU引入护理包并没有导致clabsi的持续减少,这是为数不多的负面研究之一。了解干预措施在特定情况下起作用(或不起作用)的机制对于优化循证护理的提供非常重要。
期刊介绍:
Aims & Scope: This is the practical, bimonthly, research-based journal for all professionals concerned with the care of neonates and their families, both in hospital and the community. It aims to support the development of the essential practice, management, education and health promotion skills required by these professionals. The JNN will provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and information between the range of professionals working in this field; promote cooperation between these professionals; facilitate partnership care with families; provide information and informed opinion; promote innovation and change in the care of neonates and their families; and provide an education resource for this important rapidly developing field.