A stochastic production frontier model for evaluating the performance efficiency of artificial intelligence investment worldwide

Ying-Chih Sun , Ozlem Cosgun , Raj Sharman , Pavankumar Mulgund , Dursun Delen
{"title":"A stochastic production frontier model for evaluating the performance efficiency of artificial intelligence investment worldwide","authors":"Ying-Chih Sun ,&nbsp;Ozlem Cosgun ,&nbsp;Raj Sharman ,&nbsp;Pavankumar Mulgund ,&nbsp;Dursun Delen","doi":"10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As artificial intelligence (AI) begins to take center stage in technological innovations, it is essential to understand the business value of AI innovation efforts and investments. While some early work at the firm level exists, there is a shortage of literature that takes a larger country-level perspective. This study investigated the effect of AI innovation efforts on production efficiency across countries using stochastic production frontier approaches. In addition, our model also included the traditional economic inputs of capital and labor. We used both the Cobb–Douglas function and Constant Elastic Substitution model specifications. The significant findings of this study are as follows: Innovation efforts in AI measured by the number of AI-related patents and capital investment in AI have a substantial effect on economic output. The significance of AI investments indicates the need for a robust digital infrastructure as a prerequisite for harnessing AI capabilities. The complementary relationship between labor and AI-related patents implies that high-skilled labor is often necessary to incorporate AI inputs into production. However, as AI capabilities develop, they weaken the effect on labor input. The study also distinguishes between AI innovation (research and development activities indicated by AI patents) and the production efficiency of AI investments (return on every dollar invested), highlighting that more AI innovation does not always translate into better production efficiency. The findings indicate that while the United States leads innovation in AI, the UK has the best production efficiency. China ranked fourth in AI innovation and has the lowest production efficiency among the countries included in the study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100357,"journal":{"name":"Decision Analytics Journal","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100504"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772662224001085/pdfft?md5=5575a0c4ac70d0a61890121fcff2341f&pid=1-s2.0-S2772662224001085-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Analytics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772662224001085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) begins to take center stage in technological innovations, it is essential to understand the business value of AI innovation efforts and investments. While some early work at the firm level exists, there is a shortage of literature that takes a larger country-level perspective. This study investigated the effect of AI innovation efforts on production efficiency across countries using stochastic production frontier approaches. In addition, our model also included the traditional economic inputs of capital and labor. We used both the Cobb–Douglas function and Constant Elastic Substitution model specifications. The significant findings of this study are as follows: Innovation efforts in AI measured by the number of AI-related patents and capital investment in AI have a substantial effect on economic output. The significance of AI investments indicates the need for a robust digital infrastructure as a prerequisite for harnessing AI capabilities. The complementary relationship between labor and AI-related patents implies that high-skilled labor is often necessary to incorporate AI inputs into production. However, as AI capabilities develop, they weaken the effect on labor input. The study also distinguishes between AI innovation (research and development activities indicated by AI patents) and the production efficiency of AI investments (return on every dollar invested), highlighting that more AI innovation does not always translate into better production efficiency. The findings indicate that while the United States leads innovation in AI, the UK has the best production efficiency. China ranked fourth in AI innovation and has the lowest production efficiency among the countries included in the study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于评估全球人工智能投资绩效效率的随机生产前沿模型
随着人工智能(AI)开始成为技术创新的核心,了解人工智能创新工作和投资的商业价值至关重要。虽然早期已有一些企业层面的研究,但从更大的国家层面来看,这方面的文献还很匮乏。本研究采用随机生产前沿方法研究了各国人工智能创新努力对生产效率的影响。此外,我们的模型还包括资本和劳动力等传统经济投入。我们使用了柯布-道格拉斯函数和恒定弹性替代模型两种规格。本研究的重要发现如下:以人工智能相关专利数量和人工智能资本投资衡量的人工智能创新努力对经济产出具有重大影响。人工智能投资的重要性表明,利用人工智能能力的先决条件是需要强大的数字基础设施。劳动力与人工智能相关专利之间的互补关系意味着,将人工智能投入纳入生产往往需要高技能劳动力。然而,随着人工智能能力的发展,它们会削弱对劳动力投入的影响。研究还区分了人工智能创新(人工智能专利所显示的研发活动)和人工智能投资的生产效率(每投资一美元的回报),强调更多的人工智能创新并不总能转化为更好的生产效率。研究结果表明,虽然美国在人工智能创新方面处于领先地位,但英国的生产效率最高。中国在人工智能创新方面排名第四,生产效率在参与研究的国家中最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An intuitionistic fuzzy analytics approach for examining factors in decentralized renewable energy adoption in emerging economies Editorial Board An analytical review of optimization techniques in information retrieval for enhanced decision support An ordinal regression approach for multicriteria decision support with interacting criteria An analytics framework for interpretable subseasonal forecasting under decadal climate variability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1