The Effect of Inhaled Oxygen on Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Elaheh Mansourie Ghezelhesari, Sedigheh Abdollahpour, Seyed Javad Hosseini, Bibi Leila Hoseini, Atefeh Yas, Ezat Hajmolarezaei, T. Khadivzadeh
{"title":"The Effect of Inhaled Oxygen on Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Elaheh Mansourie Ghezelhesari, Sedigheh Abdollahpour, Seyed Javad Hosseini, Bibi Leila Hoseini, Atefeh Yas, Ezat Hajmolarezaei, T. Khadivzadeh","doi":"10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_118_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Postpartum Hemorrhage (PPH) is a significant problem that can increase the risk of maternal mortality. Previous studies investigated the effect of Inhaled Oxygen (IO) on PPH. They found some conflicting results. Thus, the current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect of IO on PPH.\n \n \n \n Randomized trials were searched according to the PRISMA framework until the end of November 2022 in Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Statistical analyses were performed in the STATA v. 14 software. I2 statistic was applied to assess heterogeneity between studies. The random effect model, sample size, and mean and standard deviation of each group were applied to report the pooled effect size. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was used to evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies. Finally, five articles were included in the meta-analysis. Two and three studies reported the mean of bleeding after vaginal delivery during one- and two-hours oxygen therapy, respectively.\n \n \n \n Results showed that IO significantly reduced bleeding by 38.91 mL in the intervention group compared to routine care (WMD: −38.91, 95%CI: −60.18 to −17.64) after vaginal delivery. In addition, IO during one (WMD: −38.42, 95%CI: −71.62 to −5.22) and two (WMD: −41.93, 95%CI: −60.15 to − 23.71) hours significantly decreased bleeding in the intervention.\n \n \n \n According to the present study, IO can significantly reduce PPH in the intervention group compared to routine care. However, more rigorously randomized clinical trials are required to decide better about this issue.\n","PeriodicalId":44816,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_118_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postpartum Hemorrhage (PPH) is a significant problem that can increase the risk of maternal mortality. Previous studies investigated the effect of Inhaled Oxygen (IO) on PPH. They found some conflicting results. Thus, the current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect of IO on PPH. Randomized trials were searched according to the PRISMA framework until the end of November 2022 in Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Statistical analyses were performed in the STATA v. 14 software. I2 statistic was applied to assess heterogeneity between studies. The random effect model, sample size, and mean and standard deviation of each group were applied to report the pooled effect size. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was used to evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies. Finally, five articles were included in the meta-analysis. Two and three studies reported the mean of bleeding after vaginal delivery during one- and two-hours oxygen therapy, respectively. Results showed that IO significantly reduced bleeding by 38.91 mL in the intervention group compared to routine care (WMD: −38.91, 95%CI: −60.18 to −17.64) after vaginal delivery. In addition, IO during one (WMD: −38.42, 95%CI: −71.62 to −5.22) and two (WMD: −41.93, 95%CI: −60.15 to − 23.71) hours significantly decreased bleeding in the intervention. According to the present study, IO can significantly reduce PPH in the intervention group compared to routine care. However, more rigorously randomized clinical trials are required to decide better about this issue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吸入氧气对产后出血的影响:系统回顾与元分析
产后出血(PPH)是一个严重的问题,会增加产妇死亡的风险。以往的研究调查了吸入氧气(IO)对 PPH 的影响。他们发现了一些相互矛盾的结果。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定 IO 对 PPH 的影响。 截至 2022 年 11 月底,根据 PRISMA 框架在 Web of Science、PubMed、Scopus 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中对随机试验进行了检索。统计分析在 STATA v. 14 软件中进行。采用 I2 统计量评估研究之间的异质性。应用随机效应模型、样本量以及各组的平均值和标准差来报告汇总效应大小。科克伦随机试验偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)第 2 版用于评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。最后,有五篇文章被纳入荟萃分析。分别有两篇和三篇研究报告了在一小时和两小时氧疗期间阴道分娩后出血的平均值。 结果显示,与常规护理相比,干预组的 IO 能明显减少阴道分娩后出血 38.91 毫升(WMD:-38.91,95%CI:-60.18 至 -17.64)。此外,干预组在 1 小时(WMD:-38.42,95%CI:-71.62 至-5.22)和 2 小时(WMD:-41.93,95%CI:-60.15 至-23.71)内进行 IO 可显著减少出血量。 根据本研究,与常规护理相比,IO 能明显减少干预组的 PPH。然而,要更好地确定这一问题,还需要更严格的随机临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
46 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Professional Development Program in Management of Midwifery Emergencies for Midwifery Graduates. A Systematic Review of Determinants Influencing Family Planning and Contraceptive Use. Beliefs, Knowledge, and Perception of Indonesian Mental Healthcare Workers Regarding Mental Illness: A Cross-Sectional Study. Demographic Differences in Insomnia and Anxiety and the Association with Cardiovascular Risk Factors among Jordanian Healthy Adult. Detecting Age Prone to Growth Retardation in Children Through a Bi-Response Nonparametric Regression Model with a Penalized Spline Estimator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1