Effect of Educational Nursing Guidelines on Self-management and Health-Related Quality of Life for Hemodialysis Patients

Mona Hassan Ibrahim, Amira Mohammed Ali, M. Allawy
{"title":"Effect of Educational Nursing Guidelines on Self-management and Health-Related Quality of Life for Hemodialysis Patients","authors":"Mona Hassan Ibrahim, Amira Mohammed Ali, M. Allawy","doi":"10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_191_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Chronic kidney disease is the biggest problem in health care today, and the primary replacement therapy, hemodialysis, has a severe impact on both self-management and quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of educational nursing guidelines on self-management and health-related quality of life for hemodialysis patients.\n \n \n \n A quasi-experimental design was used. A convenience sample of 100 hemodialysis patients in the hemodialysis unit at Ismailia General Hospital, 50 patients for the study and 50 patients for the control groups. Data were collected using a patient demographic information questionnaire, hemodialysis self-management scale, and survey instrument on kidney disease quality of life 36-item (KDQOL-36). The intervention was conducted over 12 weeks in five sessions, from implementing the guidelines to the post-test phase. The control group received the usual care. SPSS version 23, descriptive statistics, and inferential statistics like independent t-test and Pearson Chi-square test were used.\n \n \n \n Regarding self-management dimensions, a statistically significant difference was found between the study and control group regarding problem-solving and communications, fluid control, diet, self-advocacy, and emotional control with p < 0.001, and effect size 5.89,4.99, 5.06, and 4.54, respectively. Regarding the quality of life domains, a statistically significant difference was found between the study and control group regarding physical functioning, mental functioning, the burden of kidney disease, management of symptoms, and kidney disease effect with p < 0.001 and the effect size 9.39, 6.07, 1.86, 7.65, and 6.96, respectively.\n \n \n \n Educational guidelines are effective for improving self-management and quality of life.\n","PeriodicalId":44816,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_191_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease is the biggest problem in health care today, and the primary replacement therapy, hemodialysis, has a severe impact on both self-management and quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of educational nursing guidelines on self-management and health-related quality of life for hemodialysis patients. A quasi-experimental design was used. A convenience sample of 100 hemodialysis patients in the hemodialysis unit at Ismailia General Hospital, 50 patients for the study and 50 patients for the control groups. Data were collected using a patient demographic information questionnaire, hemodialysis self-management scale, and survey instrument on kidney disease quality of life 36-item (KDQOL-36). The intervention was conducted over 12 weeks in five sessions, from implementing the guidelines to the post-test phase. The control group received the usual care. SPSS version 23, descriptive statistics, and inferential statistics like independent t-test and Pearson Chi-square test were used. Regarding self-management dimensions, a statistically significant difference was found between the study and control group regarding problem-solving and communications, fluid control, diet, self-advocacy, and emotional control with p < 0.001, and effect size 5.89,4.99, 5.06, and 4.54, respectively. Regarding the quality of life domains, a statistically significant difference was found between the study and control group regarding physical functioning, mental functioning, the burden of kidney disease, management of symptoms, and kidney disease effect with p < 0.001 and the effect size 9.39, 6.07, 1.86, 7.65, and 6.96, respectively. Educational guidelines are effective for improving self-management and quality of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育性护理指南对血液透析患者自我管理和健康相关生活质量的影响
慢性肾脏病是当今医疗保健领域最大的问题,其主要替代疗法--血液透析--严重影响患者的自我管理和生活质量。本研究旨在评估教育性护理指南对血液透析患者自我管理和健康相关生活质量的影响。 研究采用了准实验设计。研究对象为伊斯梅利亚综合医院血液透析室的 100 名血液透析患者,其中 50 名患者为研究组,50 名患者为对照组。使用患者人口信息调查表、血液透析自我管理量表和肾病生活质量 36 项调查工具(KDQOL-36)收集数据。干预从实施指南到后期测试阶段,共分五次,历时 12 周。对照组接受常规护理。研究使用了 SPSS 23 版本、描述性统计和推论性统计,如独立 t 检验和皮尔逊卡方检验。 在自我管理方面,研究组和对照组在解决问题和沟通、液体控制、饮食、自我倡导和情绪控制方面的差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001),效应大小分别为 5.89、4.99、5.06 和 4.54。在生活质量方面,研究组与对照组在身体功能、精神功能、肾病负担、症状管理和肾病效果方面的差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001),效应大小分别为 9.39、6.07、1.86、7.65 和 6.96。 教育指南可有效改善自我管理和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
46 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Professional Development Program in Management of Midwifery Emergencies for Midwifery Graduates. A Systematic Review of Determinants Influencing Family Planning and Contraceptive Use. Beliefs, Knowledge, and Perception of Indonesian Mental Healthcare Workers Regarding Mental Illness: A Cross-Sectional Study. Demographic Differences in Insomnia and Anxiety and the Association with Cardiovascular Risk Factors among Jordanian Healthy Adult. Detecting Age Prone to Growth Retardation in Children Through a Bi-Response Nonparametric Regression Model with a Penalized Spline Estimator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1