Radiographic assessment of calcaneal fractures; A new approach to Böhler’s angle using computed tomography

Q2 Health Professions Foot Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1016/j.foot.2024.102119
Robin Eelsing , Robert Hemke , Kim van Oudenaarde , Jens A. Halm , Tim Schepers
{"title":"Radiographic assessment of calcaneal fractures; A new approach to Böhler’s angle using computed tomography","authors":"Robin Eelsing ,&nbsp;Robert Hemke ,&nbsp;Kim van Oudenaarde ,&nbsp;Jens A. Halm ,&nbsp;Tim Schepers","doi":"10.1016/j.foot.2024.102119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Böhler’s angle (BA) is used for identifying calcaneal fractures and evaluating calcaneal collapse after reconstruction. This study investigates whether it is possible to determine BA with the help of Computed Tomography (CT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective study was performed to compare the BA on conventional radiograph (Gold Standard, GS) versus measurements on CT. Two groups were studied: one group consisted of 11 subjects with a diagnosed calcaneal fracture, the other group of 11 subjects with a fracture of the lower extremities but no calcaneal fracture. A lateral Böhler angle (LBA), central Böhler angle (CBA) and a medial Böhler angle (MBA) were defined on CT. Furthermore, BA was reconstructed out of a 3D reconstruction (3DBA).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>CBA approached the GS with a mean difference of 3.78° (95 %CI: 2.82–4.75) with no significant difference in variance (p = 1.000). 3DBA approached the GS with a mean difference of 2.14° (95 %CI: 1.57–2.70) with a significant difference in variance (p = 0.014). No relevant correlations were found between LBA/MBA and the GS. ICC between raters was considered as good or excellent for both CBA and 3DBA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Giving the high accuracy and better capability to visualize the anatomy in the case of severe injury, measuring BA on 3D reconstruction is a suggested alternative to the traditional technique.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>III, Retrospective</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12349,"journal":{"name":"Foot","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095825922400052X/pdfft?md5=cb4acfc0fdf2a6319d145010dee04877&pid=1-s2.0-S095825922400052X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095825922400052X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Böhler’s angle (BA) is used for identifying calcaneal fractures and evaluating calcaneal collapse after reconstruction. This study investigates whether it is possible to determine BA with the help of Computed Tomography (CT).

Methods

A retrospective study was performed to compare the BA on conventional radiograph (Gold Standard, GS) versus measurements on CT. Two groups were studied: one group consisted of 11 subjects with a diagnosed calcaneal fracture, the other group of 11 subjects with a fracture of the lower extremities but no calcaneal fracture. A lateral Böhler angle (LBA), central Böhler angle (CBA) and a medial Böhler angle (MBA) were defined on CT. Furthermore, BA was reconstructed out of a 3D reconstruction (3DBA).

Results

CBA approached the GS with a mean difference of 3.78° (95 %CI: 2.82–4.75) with no significant difference in variance (p = 1.000). 3DBA approached the GS with a mean difference of 2.14° (95 %CI: 1.57–2.70) with a significant difference in variance (p = 0.014). No relevant correlations were found between LBA/MBA and the GS. ICC between raters was considered as good or excellent for both CBA and 3DBA.

Conclusion

Giving the high accuracy and better capability to visualize the anatomy in the case of severe injury, measuring BA on 3D reconstruction is a suggested alternative to the traditional technique.

Level of evidence

III, Retrospective

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钙骨骨折的放射学评估;使用计算机断层扫描测量伯勒角的新方法
背景伯勒氏角(BA)用于识别小腿骨骨折和评估重建后的小腿骨塌陷。本研究探讨了是否有可能借助计算机断层扫描(CT)来确定BA。方法 本研究进行了一项回顾性研究,以比较传统 X 光片(黄金标准,GS)上的 BA 与 CT 上的测量值。研究分为两组:一组包括 11 名确诊为小关节骨折的受试者,另一组包括 11 名下肢骨折但无小关节骨折的受试者。在 CT 上确定了外侧伯勒角(LBA)、中央伯勒角(CBA)和内侧伯勒角(MBA)。结果CBA接近GS的平均差为3.78°(95 %CI:2.82-4.75),方差无显著差异(p = 1.000)。3DBA 接近 GS 的平均差为 2.14°(95 %CI:1.57-2.70),差异显著(p = 0.014)。没有发现 LBA/MBA 与 GS 之间存在相关性。结论在严重损伤的情况下,通过三维重建测量 BA 具有较高的准确性和更好的解剖可视化能力,是一种替代传统技术的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot
Foot Health Professions-Podiatry
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Foot is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of scientific approaches and medical and surgical treatment of the foot. The Foot aims to provide a multidisciplinary platform for all specialties involved in treating disorders of the foot. At present it is the only journal which provides this inter-disciplinary opportunity. Primary research papers cover a wide range of disorders of the foot and their treatment, including diabetes, vascular disease, neurological, dermatological and infectious conditions, sports injuries, biomechanics, bioengineering, orthoses and prostheses.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of custom hard-shell 3D-printed foot orthoses in a cohort of patients who did not respond to treatment with custom ethylene-vinyl-acetate (EVA) foot orthoses Regional changes in the free Achilles tendon volume in response to repeated submaximal contractions Mechanical drivers of intrinsic foot muscle for maximum toe flexor strength in upright standing across different body size Accuracy and reliability of the Ipswich touch test in identifying loss of protective sensation among diabetic patients Predictors of poor pre-operative patient reported outcome measures in elective foot and ankle surgery: Analysis of 1217 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1