Multitargeted molecular docking and dynamics simulation studies of 1,3,4-thiadiazoles synthesised from (R)-carvone against specific tumour protein markers: An In-silico study of two diastereoisomers
{"title":"Multitargeted molecular docking and dynamics simulation studies of 1,3,4-thiadiazoles synthesised from (R)-carvone against specific tumour protein markers: An In-silico study of two diastereoisomers","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the present work, we describe the synthesis of new 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives from natural (R)-carvone in three steps including, dichloro-cyclopropanation, a condensation with thiosemicarbazide and then a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction with various nitrilimines. the targeted compounds were structurally identified by <sup>1</sup>H & <sup>13</sup>C NMR and HRMS analyses. The cytotoxic assay demonstrated that some synthesized novel compounds were potent on certain cancer cell lines. Molecular modeling studies were undertaken to rationalize the wet lab study results. Furthermore, molecular docking was performed to unveil the binding potential of the most active derivatives, <strong>3a</strong> and <strong>6c</strong>, to caspase-3 and COX-2. The stabilities of the protein-compound complexes obtained from the docking were evaluated using MD simulation. Furthermore, FMO and related parameters of the active compounds and their stereoisomers were examined through DFT studies. The docking study showed compound <strong>6c</strong> had a higher binding potential than caspase-3. However, the binding strength of <strong>6c</strong> was found to be less than that of the standard drug, doxorubicin, as it formed lower conventional hydrogen bonds. On the other hand, compound <strong>3a</strong> had a higher binding potential to COX-2. However, the binding potential <strong>3a</strong> was much lower than that of the standard COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib. The MD simulation demonstrated that the caspase-3-<strong>6c</strong> complex was less stable than the caspase-3-doxorubicin complex. In contrast, the COX-2-<strong>3a</strong> complex was stable, and <strong>3a</strong> was anticipated to remain inside the protein's binding pocket. The DFT study showed that <strong>3a</strong> had higher chemical stability than <strong>6c</strong>. The electron exchange capacity, chemical stability, and molecular orbital distributions of the stereoisomers of the active compounds were also found to be alike.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10616,"journal":{"name":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476927124001476","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the present work, we describe the synthesis of new 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives from natural (R)-carvone in three steps including, dichloro-cyclopropanation, a condensation with thiosemicarbazide and then a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction with various nitrilimines. the targeted compounds were structurally identified by 1H & 13C NMR and HRMS analyses. The cytotoxic assay demonstrated that some synthesized novel compounds were potent on certain cancer cell lines. Molecular modeling studies were undertaken to rationalize the wet lab study results. Furthermore, molecular docking was performed to unveil the binding potential of the most active derivatives, 3a and 6c, to caspase-3 and COX-2. The stabilities of the protein-compound complexes obtained from the docking were evaluated using MD simulation. Furthermore, FMO and related parameters of the active compounds and their stereoisomers were examined through DFT studies. The docking study showed compound 6c had a higher binding potential than caspase-3. However, the binding strength of 6c was found to be less than that of the standard drug, doxorubicin, as it formed lower conventional hydrogen bonds. On the other hand, compound 3a had a higher binding potential to COX-2. However, the binding potential 3a was much lower than that of the standard COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib. The MD simulation demonstrated that the caspase-3-6c complex was less stable than the caspase-3-doxorubicin complex. In contrast, the COX-2-3a complex was stable, and 3a was anticipated to remain inside the protein's binding pocket. The DFT study showed that 3a had higher chemical stability than 6c. The electron exchange capacity, chemical stability, and molecular orbital distributions of the stereoisomers of the active compounds were also found to be alike.
期刊介绍:
Computational Biology and Chemistry publishes original research papers and review articles in all areas of computational life sciences. High quality research contributions with a major computational component in the areas of nucleic acid and protein sequence research, molecular evolution, molecular genetics (functional genomics and proteomics), theory and practice of either biology-specific or chemical-biology-specific modeling, and structural biology of nucleic acids and proteins are particularly welcome. Exceptionally high quality research work in bioinformatics, systems biology, ecology, computational pharmacology, metabolism, biomedical engineering, epidemiology, and statistical genetics will also be considered.
Given their inherent uncertainty, protein modeling and molecular docking studies should be thoroughly validated. In the absence of experimental results for validation, the use of molecular dynamics simulations along with detailed free energy calculations, for example, should be used as complementary techniques to support the major conclusions. Submissions of premature modeling exercises without additional biological insights will not be considered.
Review articles will generally be commissioned by the editors and should not be submitted to the journal without explicit invitation. However prospective authors are welcome to send a brief (one to three pages) synopsis, which will be evaluated by the editors.