12. Residual paresthesia and satisfaction after surgery for cervical myelopathy

{"title":"12. Residual paresthesia and satisfaction after surgery for cervical myelopathy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><p>Surgical intervention for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is intended to improve or prevent further decline in the patient's physical function and overall quality of life (QOL). Despite improvements in both myelopathy and QOL post-surgery, many patients express dissatisfaction due to the persistence of severe residual paresthesia.</p></div><div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><p>This study seeks to determine the frequency of residual paresthesia following DCM surgery and to evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3><p>A multi-center, prospective cohort study</p></div><div><h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3><p>The study included 187 patients who underwent laminoplasty for DCM.</p></div><div><h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3><p>Assessed measures included preoperative factors, variations in clinical scores (JOA scores, VAS of upper extremity paresthesia, VAS of neck pain, NDI, EQ-5D-5l, and JOACMEQ), radiographic parameters (cervical sagittal vertical axis, C2-C7 angle, and C2-7 range of motion), and a 5-level satisfaction scale at 1 year postoperatively.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Participants were categorized into two groups based on their VAS scores for upper extremity paresthesia at 1-year post-surgery: severe paresthesia (&gt;40 mm) and no/mild paresthesia (≤40 mm). Comparative analysis of preoperative factors, changes in clinical scores and radiographic factors, and satisfaction levels at 1-year post-surgery was performed between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Out of 187 patients, 86 experienced severe residual paresthesia 1-year postoperatively. Preoperative pain scale scores were significantly linked to postoperative residual paresthesia, independent of age, initial paresthesia severity, and other preoperative clinical scores (p=0.032). Mixed-effect modeling indicated that patients with severe residual paresthesia showed significantly less improvement in QOL (p=0.046) and myelopathy (p=0.037) compared to those with no/mild paresthesia. Logistic regression revealed that residual paresthesia was a significant predictor of lower treatment satisfaction, independent of myelopathy and QOL improvements (adjusted odds ratio: 2.5, p=0.010).</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>At one year postoperatively, 45% of DCM patients exhibited severe residual paresthesia, correlating with significantly lower satisfaction with their treatment despite improvements in myelopathy and QOL. These findings suggest that a multidisciplinary approach addressing residual paresthesia, including pharmacological management of neuropathic pain, may be essential for improving patient outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654842400043X/pdfft?md5=58509d5bfab25d1062167913aad166a2&pid=1-s2.0-S266654842400043X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654842400043X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical intervention for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is intended to improve or prevent further decline in the patient's physical function and overall quality of life (QOL). Despite improvements in both myelopathy and QOL post-surgery, many patients express dissatisfaction due to the persistence of severe residual paresthesia.

PURPOSE

This study seeks to determine the frequency of residual paresthesia following DCM surgery and to evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A multi-center, prospective cohort study

PATIENT SAMPLE

The study included 187 patients who underwent laminoplasty for DCM.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Assessed measures included preoperative factors, variations in clinical scores (JOA scores, VAS of upper extremity paresthesia, VAS of neck pain, NDI, EQ-5D-5l, and JOACMEQ), radiographic parameters (cervical sagittal vertical axis, C2-C7 angle, and C2-7 range of motion), and a 5-level satisfaction scale at 1 year postoperatively.

METHODS

Participants were categorized into two groups based on their VAS scores for upper extremity paresthesia at 1-year post-surgery: severe paresthesia (>40 mm) and no/mild paresthesia (≤40 mm). Comparative analysis of preoperative factors, changes in clinical scores and radiographic factors, and satisfaction levels at 1-year post-surgery was performed between the groups.

RESULTS

Out of 187 patients, 86 experienced severe residual paresthesia 1-year postoperatively. Preoperative pain scale scores were significantly linked to postoperative residual paresthesia, independent of age, initial paresthesia severity, and other preoperative clinical scores (p=0.032). Mixed-effect modeling indicated that patients with severe residual paresthesia showed significantly less improvement in QOL (p=0.046) and myelopathy (p=0.037) compared to those with no/mild paresthesia. Logistic regression revealed that residual paresthesia was a significant predictor of lower treatment satisfaction, independent of myelopathy and QOL improvements (adjusted odds ratio: 2.5, p=0.010).

CONCLUSION

At one year postoperatively, 45% of DCM patients exhibited severe residual paresthesia, correlating with significantly lower satisfaction with their treatment despite improvements in myelopathy and QOL. These findings suggest that a multidisciplinary approach addressing residual paresthesia, including pharmacological management of neuropathic pain, may be essential for improving patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
12.颈椎病手术后的残余麻痹感和满意度
背景对退行性颈椎脊髓病(DCM)进行手术干预的目的是改善或防止患者的身体功能和整体生活质量(QOL)进一步下降。尽管术后脊髓病和 QOL 均有所改善,但许多患者仍对严重的残余麻痹感表示不满。目的本研究旨在确定 DCM 术后残余麻痹感的发生频率,并评估其对临床结果和患者满意度的影响。结果测量评估指标包括术前因素、临床评分变化(JOA 评分、上肢疼痛 VAS、颈部疼痛 VAS、NDI、EQ-5D-5l 和 JOACMEQ)、放射学参数(颈椎矢状纵轴、C2-C7 角度和 C2-7 活动范围)以及术后 1 年的 5 级满意度量表。方法根据参与者术后 1 年时上肢麻痹的 VAS 评分将其分为两组:重度麻痹(>40 mm)和无/轻度麻痹(≤40 mm)。对两组患者的术前因素、临床评分和影像学因素的变化以及术后 1 年的满意度进行了比较分析。术前疼痛量表评分与术后残余痛觉明显相关,与年龄、初始痛觉严重程度和其他术前临床评分无关(P=0.032)。混合效应模型显示,与无/轻度麻痹患者相比,重度残余麻痹患者的 QOL(p=0.046)和脊髓病(p=0.037)改善程度明显较低。逻辑回归显示,残余麻痹是降低治疗满意度的重要预测因素,与脊髓病和 QOL 的改善无关(调整后的几率比:2.5,p=0.010)。结论术后一年,45% 的 DCM 患者表现出严重的残余麻痹,尽管脊髓病和 QOL 有所改善,但其治疗满意度却明显较低。这些研究结果表明,采用多学科方法治疗残余麻痹,包括神经病理性疼痛的药物治疗,可能对改善患者预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
期刊最新文献
Genetics and pathogenesis of scoliosis Incidence of temporary intraoperative iliac artery occlusion during anterior spinal surgery The hidden risk: Intracranial hemorrhage following durotomies in spine surgery Sequential correction of sagittal vertical alignment and lumbar lordosis in adult flatback deformity Spinal alignment and surgical correction in the aging spine and osteoporotic patient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1