Comparative simulated insertion between T-Control® and Foley-type catheter in nursing students with no prior training

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING Teaching and Learning in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2024.06.013
Pedro Raúl Castellano-Santana PhD, RN , Clara Armas-Moreno BSc , Max Mòdol-Vidal MSc , Marta Serrano-Muñoz PhD , José Enrique Hernández-Rodríguez PhD, RN , Lucía Cilleros-Pino PhD, RN , Szilvia Endrényi MEc (Master of Economics) , Manuel Luque-González RN , Maximino Díaz-Hernández PhD, RN
{"title":"Comparative simulated insertion between T-Control® and Foley-type catheter in nursing students with no prior training","authors":"Pedro Raúl Castellano-Santana PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Clara Armas-Moreno BSc ,&nbsp;Max Mòdol-Vidal MSc ,&nbsp;Marta Serrano-Muñoz PhD ,&nbsp;José Enrique Hernández-Rodríguez PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Lucía Cilleros-Pino PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Szilvia Endrényi MEc (Master of Economics) ,&nbsp;Manuel Luque-González RN ,&nbsp;Maximino Díaz-Hernández PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.06.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To simulate the insertion of the new T-Control® urinary catheter with first-year nursing students without previous experience in bladder catheterization and assess the functionality and students' satisfaction compared with the conventional Foley-type catheter.</p></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>A comparative, crossover study was conducted with nursing students. After receiving theoretical training, the participants performed the bladder catheterization with both catheters, the conventional Foley and the T-Control® catheter, on specific mannikins for bladder catheterization. The students assessed both devices by completing an ad hoc satisfaction questionnaire with 33 questions to compare both devices.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>T-Control® obtained better scores than the conventional Foley catheter in most individual questions. In the same way, T-Control® was chosen for more than 65% of participants in nine of the eleven statements of the comparative section, all with a positive connotation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The T-Control® catheter was the best-rated device in both the individual and the comparative questions. Most of the students would choose T-Control® for their future patients. This study has allowed participants to know and practice a technique in nursing work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"19 4","pages":"Pages e695-e702"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724001331/pdfft?md5=1e96f91e1042d4969976af86075c8084&pid=1-s2.0-S1557308724001331-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724001331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To simulate the insertion of the new T-Control® urinary catheter with first-year nursing students without previous experience in bladder catheterization and assess the functionality and students' satisfaction compared with the conventional Foley-type catheter.

Material and Methods

A comparative, crossover study was conducted with nursing students. After receiving theoretical training, the participants performed the bladder catheterization with both catheters, the conventional Foley and the T-Control® catheter, on specific mannikins for bladder catheterization. The students assessed both devices by completing an ad hoc satisfaction questionnaire with 33 questions to compare both devices.

Results

T-Control® obtained better scores than the conventional Foley catheter in most individual questions. In the same way, T-Control® was chosen for more than 65% of participants in nine of the eleven statements of the comparative section, all with a positive connotation.

Conclusions

The T-Control® catheter was the best-rated device in both the individual and the comparative questions. Most of the students would choose T-Control® for their future patients. This study has allowed participants to know and practice a technique in nursing work.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在未接受过培训的护理专业学生中进行 T-Control® 和 Foley 型导管的模拟插入比较
目的模拟没有膀胱导尿经验的护理专业一年级学生插入新型 T-Control® 导尿管,并评估其与传统 Foley 型导尿管相比的功能性和学生满意度。在接受理论培训后,参与者使用两种导尿管,即传统的 Foley 导管和 T-Control® 导管,在特定的膀胱导尿人偶上进行膀胱导尿。学生们通过填写一份包含 33 个问题的特别满意度问卷对两种导尿管进行了评估,以比较两种导尿管。同样,在比较部分的 11 个问题中的 9 个问题中,有 65% 以上的参与者选择了 T-Control® ,所有问题都具有积极意义。大多数学生都会为他们未来的病人选择 T-Control® 导管。这项研究让学员们了解并实践了护理工作中的一项技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
期刊最新文献
Perception of caring behaviors of faculty members from the perspective of nursing students The Urgency of Teaching Theory in the Current Nursing Education Landscape OADN's Milestone Anniversary: Celebrating 40 Years of Advocacy, Education, and Leadership Nurse Educators’ Perspectives in Facilitating Ethics Education: A Descriptive Qualitative Study Implementing Entrustable Professional Activities in a pre-licensure nursing program to facilitate competency-based education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1