52. Establishing case volume benchmarks for ACGME-accredited orthopaedic surgery of the spine fellowship training

{"title":"52. Establishing case volume benchmarks for ACGME-accredited orthopaedic surgery of the spine fellowship training","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3><p>There has been increasing scrutiny on the standardization of surgical fellowship training in the US.</p></div><div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><p>This study provides case volume benchmarks for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopaedic spine surgery fellowship training.</p></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3><p>This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of fellows at ACGME-accredited orthopaedic spine surgery fellowships (2017–2022).</p></div><div><h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3><p>N/A</p></div><div><h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3><p>Reported case volume during fellowship training.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Case volume percentiles were calculated across ACGME-defined case categories and temporal changes assessed via linear regression. Variability between the highest and lowest deciles by case volume was calculated as fold-differences (90<sup>th</sup> percentile / 10<sup>th</sup> percentile). Sensitivity analyses were performed to identify potential targets for case minimum requirements.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>A total of 163 spine surgery fellows were included in this study. Total mean reported spine surgery case volume increased from 313.2±122 in 2017 to 382.0±164 in 2022 (P=0.194). Most cases were classified as adult (range, 97.2%-98.0%) over pediatric cases (range, 2.0-2.8%). An average of 322.0 cases were reported and most were classified as laminectomy (32%), posterior arthrodesis (29%), and anterior arthrodesis (20%) (Figure). Overall variability in total case volume was 2.4 and the greatest variabilities existed for posterior instrumentation (38.1), application of cage (34.6), anterior instrumentation (20.8), and fractures and dislocations (17.3). If case minimum requirements for total reported cases was assumed at 200 cases, then all spine fellows included in this study would achieve this requirement. However, if case minimum requirements were assumed at 250 total cases, then approximately thirty percent of fellows (n=49) would not achieve this requirement for graduation.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Increasingly, national societies and accrediting bodies in surgical education recognize the need for standardized training. Surgical case benchmarks can inform potential case minimum requirements and help reduce variability during spine fellowship training. Future studies are needed to establish case minimum requirements in spine surgery including establishment of competency-based assessments and learning curves for essential spine surgeries.</p></div><div><h3>FDA Device/Drug Status</h3><p>This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424000830/pdfft?md5=483d9b15660faf203f82b7a811c04b11&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424000830-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424000830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

There has been increasing scrutiny on the standardization of surgical fellowship training in the US.

PURPOSE

This study provides case volume benchmarks for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopaedic spine surgery fellowship training.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of fellows at ACGME-accredited orthopaedic spine surgery fellowships (2017–2022).

PATIENT SAMPLE

N/A

OUTCOME MEASURES

Reported case volume during fellowship training.

METHODS

Case volume percentiles were calculated across ACGME-defined case categories and temporal changes assessed via linear regression. Variability between the highest and lowest deciles by case volume was calculated as fold-differences (90th percentile / 10th percentile). Sensitivity analyses were performed to identify potential targets for case minimum requirements.

RESULTS

A total of 163 spine surgery fellows were included in this study. Total mean reported spine surgery case volume increased from 313.2±122 in 2017 to 382.0±164 in 2022 (P=0.194). Most cases were classified as adult (range, 97.2%-98.0%) over pediatric cases (range, 2.0-2.8%). An average of 322.0 cases were reported and most were classified as laminectomy (32%), posterior arthrodesis (29%), and anterior arthrodesis (20%) (Figure). Overall variability in total case volume was 2.4 and the greatest variabilities existed for posterior instrumentation (38.1), application of cage (34.6), anterior instrumentation (20.8), and fractures and dislocations (17.3). If case minimum requirements for total reported cases was assumed at 200 cases, then all spine fellows included in this study would achieve this requirement. However, if case minimum requirements were assumed at 250 total cases, then approximately thirty percent of fellows (n=49) would not achieve this requirement for graduation.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasingly, national societies and accrediting bodies in surgical education recognize the need for standardized training. Surgical case benchmarks can inform potential case minimum requirements and help reduce variability during spine fellowship training. Future studies are needed to establish case minimum requirements in spine surgery including establishment of competency-based assessments and learning curves for essential spine surgeries.

FDA Device/Drug Status

This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
52.为 ACGME 认可的脊柱矫形外科研究金培训制定病例量基准
背景 CONTEXT在美国,外科研究员培训的标准化受到越来越多的关注。目的本研究为毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)认可的骨科脊柱外科研究员培训提供病例量基准。研究设计/设置这是一项回顾性横断面研究,研究对象为 ACGME 认可的骨科脊柱外科研究员(2017-2022 年).患者抽样/结果测量在研究员培训期间报告的病例量.方法在 ACGME 定义的病例类别中计算病例量百分位数,并通过线性回归评估时间变化。病例量最高十分位数和最低十分位数之间的变异性以折差(第 90 个百分位数/第 10 个百分位数)计算。研究还进行了敏感性分析,以确定病例最低要求的潜在目标。报告的脊柱外科总平均病例量从2017年的313.2±122例增加到2022年的382.0±164例(P=0.194)。大多数病例被归类为成人病例(范围为97.2%-98.0%),而非儿童病例(范围为2.0%-2.8%)。报告的平均病例数为 322.0 例,大多数病例被归类为椎板切除术(32%)、后关节置换术(29%)和前关节置换术(20%)(图)。病例总数的总体差异为 2.4,差异最大的是后路器械置换术(38.1)、骨笼应用(34.6)、前路器械置换术(20.8)以及骨折和脱位(17.3)。如果假定报告病例总数的最低要求为 200 例,那么本研究中的所有脊柱外科医生都将达到这一要求。结论越来越多的国家协会和外科教育认证机构认识到标准化培训的必要性。手术病例基准可为潜在的病例最低要求提供参考,并有助于减少脊柱研究员培训期间的变异性。未来需要进行研究以确定脊柱外科的病例最低要求,包括建立基于能力的评估和基本脊柱外科手术的学习曲线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
期刊最新文献
Genetics and pathogenesis of scoliosis Incidence of temporary intraoperative iliac artery occlusion during anterior spinal surgery The hidden risk: Intracranial hemorrhage following durotomies in spine surgery Sequential correction of sagittal vertical alignment and lumbar lordosis in adult flatback deformity Spinal alignment and surgical correction in the aging spine and osteoporotic patient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1