Utility of PET for Nodal Staging in Subsolid Clinical Stage IA (T1 N0) Lung Adenocarcinoma

Devanish N. Kamtam MBBS, MS , Joseph B. Shrager MD , Irmina A. Elliott MD , Henry H. Guo MD, PhD , Brandon A. Guenthart MD , Douglas Z. Liou MD , Natalie S. Lui MD , Leah M. Backhus MD , Mark F. Berry MD
{"title":"Utility of PET for Nodal Staging in Subsolid Clinical Stage IA (T1 N0) Lung Adenocarcinoma","authors":"Devanish N. Kamtam MBBS, MS ,&nbsp;Joseph B. Shrager MD ,&nbsp;Irmina A. Elliott MD ,&nbsp;Henry H. Guo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Brandon A. Guenthart MD ,&nbsp;Douglas Z. Liou MD ,&nbsp;Natalie S. Lui MD ,&nbsp;Leah M. Backhus MD ,&nbsp;Mark F. Berry MD","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Positron emission tomography (PET) is the standard of care for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) clinical staging, but it may have limited utility in evaluating subsolid lung adenocarcinomas that can have relatively indolent behavior without hypermetabolic activity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The sensitivity and specificity of PET for determining pathologic lymph node status and disease-free survival were assessed in patients operated on for cT1 N0 subsolid lung adenocarcinoma from January 2006 to June 2022 (at Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA). Patients with clinical or pathologic tumor size &gt;30 mm, hilar or mediastinal lymph node size &gt;1cm, and purely solid tumors were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>PET was available in 498 of 534 (93.2%) patients and more often was used in older patients with larger and more solid tumors. The overall pathologic lymph node–positive rate was 8.4% (45 of 534). PET specificity was 95.1%, but sensitivity was only 20.0%. A tumor diameter of 18.5 mm and a solid component percentage of 62.5% had the maximum predictive accuracy for pathologic lymph node positivity, with a 0% and 1.5% rate of pathologic and PET lymph node positivity, respectively, for tumors with values lower than those thresholds. There was no significant difference in 5-year disease-free survival between individuals who did and did not undergo PET scanning (76.6% vs 96.8%; <em>P</em> = .07). Conversely, 134 (26.9%) patients who underwent PET scanning had 171 incidentally detected hypermetabolic lesions unrelated to lung cancer, with only 13 of 134 (9.7%) patients identified as having non-NSCLC premalignant or malignant conditions requiring further therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PET scan use for subsolid lung adenocarcinoma has high specificity but limited sensitivity for predicting pathologic lymph node positivity. PET also has no association with disease-free survival and often detects clinically unimportant findings rather than changing lung cancer management, particularly for patients with smaller and less solid tumors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 118-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277299312400319X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Positron emission tomography (PET) is the standard of care for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) clinical staging, but it may have limited utility in evaluating subsolid lung adenocarcinomas that can have relatively indolent behavior without hypermetabolic activity.

Methods

The sensitivity and specificity of PET for determining pathologic lymph node status and disease-free survival were assessed in patients operated on for cT1 N0 subsolid lung adenocarcinoma from January 2006 to June 2022 (at Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA). Patients with clinical or pathologic tumor size >30 mm, hilar or mediastinal lymph node size >1cm, and purely solid tumors were excluded.

Results

PET was available in 498 of 534 (93.2%) patients and more often was used in older patients with larger and more solid tumors. The overall pathologic lymph node–positive rate was 8.4% (45 of 534). PET specificity was 95.1%, but sensitivity was only 20.0%. A tumor diameter of 18.5 mm and a solid component percentage of 62.5% had the maximum predictive accuracy for pathologic lymph node positivity, with a 0% and 1.5% rate of pathologic and PET lymph node positivity, respectively, for tumors with values lower than those thresholds. There was no significant difference in 5-year disease-free survival between individuals who did and did not undergo PET scanning (76.6% vs 96.8%; P = .07). Conversely, 134 (26.9%) patients who underwent PET scanning had 171 incidentally detected hypermetabolic lesions unrelated to lung cancer, with only 13 of 134 (9.7%) patients identified as having non-NSCLC premalignant or malignant conditions requiring further therapy.

Conclusions

PET scan use for subsolid lung adenocarcinoma has high specificity but limited sensitivity for predicting pathologic lymph node positivity. PET also has no association with disease-free survival and often detects clinically unimportant findings rather than changing lung cancer management, particularly for patients with smaller and less solid tumors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正电子发射计算机断层显像技术对亚实体临床ⅠA 期(T1N0)肺腺癌结节分期的实用性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
期刊最新文献
Contents V-Shaped Incision of the Proximal Cartilage for High-Caliber Mismatch in Bronchoplasty Concurrent Explant of Infected Transcatheter Aortic Valve and Implant of Ventricular Assist Device The Catheter Fell Out Utility of PET for Nodal Staging in Subsolid Clinical Stage IA (T1 N0) Lung Adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1