Interpretation of immediately released health information: Informing patient medical education in breast oncology

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115853
Elizabeth O'Brien , Abigail Ludwigson , Sudheer Vemuru , Madeline Higgins , Karen Hampanda , Monica Adams , Dulcy Wolverton , Sharon Sams , Nancy Taft , Randy Miles , Chen-Tan Lin , Ethan Cumbler , Sarah Tevis
{"title":"Interpretation of immediately released health information: Informing patient medical education in breast oncology","authors":"Elizabeth O'Brien ,&nbsp;Abigail Ludwigson ,&nbsp;Sudheer Vemuru ,&nbsp;Madeline Higgins ,&nbsp;Karen Hampanda ,&nbsp;Monica Adams ,&nbsp;Dulcy Wolverton ,&nbsp;Sharon Sams ,&nbsp;Nancy Taft ,&nbsp;Randy Miles ,&nbsp;Chen-Tan Lin ,&nbsp;Ethan Cumbler ,&nbsp;Sarah Tevis","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Cures Act mandated immediately released health information. In this study, we investigated patient comprehension of mammography reports and the utility of online resources to aid report interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who received a normal mammogram from February to April 2022 were invited to complete semi-structured interviews paired with health literacy questionnaires to assess patient's report comprehension before and after internet search.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirteen selected patients via purposeful sampling completed interviews. Most patients described their initial understanding of the mammography report as “good” and improved to between “good” and “very good” after an internet search. Patients suggested “a little column on the side\" for medical terminology, “an extra prompt\" for making an appointment, or a recommendation for “good sites” to improve mammography reports.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients varied in their ability to independently interpret medical reports and seek additional resources. While online resources marginally improved patient understanding, actionable and clear resources are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 115853"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024004057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Cures Act mandated immediately released health information. In this study, we investigated patient comprehension of mammography reports and the utility of online resources to aid report interpretation.

Methods

Patients who received a normal mammogram from February to April 2022 were invited to complete semi-structured interviews paired with health literacy questionnaires to assess patient's report comprehension before and after internet search.

Results

Thirteen selected patients via purposeful sampling completed interviews. Most patients described their initial understanding of the mammography report as “good” and improved to between “good” and “very good” after an internet search. Patients suggested “a little column on the side" for medical terminology, “an extra prompt" for making an appointment, or a recommendation for “good sites” to improve mammography reports.

Conclusion

Patients varied in their ability to independently interpret medical reports and seek additional resources. While online resources marginally improved patient understanding, actionable and clear resources are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解读即时发布的健康信息:为乳腺肿瘤患者医疗教育提供信息
《治愈法案》要求立即公布健康信息。在这项研究中,我们调查了患者对乳房x光检查报告的理解以及在线资源对报告解释的帮助。方法对2022年2月至4月接受乳腺x线检查的患者进行半结构化访谈,并结合健康素养问卷,评估患者在网络搜索前后对报告的理解程度。结果通过有目的的抽样,选取13例患者完成访谈。大多数患者描述他们对乳房x光检查报告的最初理解为“好”,并在互联网搜索后改善到“好”和“非常好”之间。病人们建议在“旁边的小栏”上写医学术语,“额外提示”预约,或者推荐“好地点”来改善乳房x光检查报告。结论:患者独立解读医学报告和寻求额外资源的能力存在差异。虽然在线资源略微提高了患者的理解,但需要可操作和明确的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of reintervention rates in mesh versus no-mesh inguinal hernia repair using electronic health records Fungating tumors, forgotten patients The suprapubic pseudosac crochet hook suspension technique in laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: An efficient alternative in pseudosac management Investigating optimal warming techniques for hypothermia in a swine model of ischemia Decreased utilization of component separation techniques over time in complex abdominal wall reconstruction following introduction of preoperative botulinum toxin A
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1