National analysis of outcomes in timing of cholecystectomy for acute cholangitis

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115851
Ayesha P. Ng , Young-Ji Seo , Konmal Ali , Troy Coaston , Saad Mallick , Christian de Virgilio , Peyman Benharash
{"title":"National analysis of outcomes in timing of cholecystectomy for acute cholangitis","authors":"Ayesha P. Ng ,&nbsp;Young-Ji Seo ,&nbsp;Konmal Ali ,&nbsp;Troy Coaston ,&nbsp;Saad Mallick ,&nbsp;Christian de Virgilio ,&nbsp;Peyman Benharash","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The present study aimed to compare outcomes between cholecystectomy on index versus delayed admission for acute cholangitis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The 2011–2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify adult patients admitted for acute cholangitis who underwent cholecystectomy. Study cohorts were defined based on timing of surgery. Multivariable regressions and Royston-Parmar time-adjusted analysis were used to evaluate the association of cholecystectomy timing and outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 65,753 patients, 82.0 ​% received surgery on <em>Index</em> and 18.0 ​% on <em>Delayed</em> admissions. Following adjustment, <em>Delayed</em> operation was associated with significantly increased odds of mortality (AOR 1.67 [95 ​% CI 1.10–2.54]), complications (1.25 [1.13–1.40]), repair of bile duct injury (1.66 [1.15–2.41]), conversion to open (1.69 [1.48–1.93]), and 30-day readmission (3.52 [3.21–3.86]). The <em>Delayed</em> cohort experienced a +$14,200 increment in hospitalization costs relative to <em>Index.</em></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholangitis is significantly associated with adverse postoperative outcomes, suggesting that index cholecystectomy may be safe to perform.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 115851"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024004033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The present study aimed to compare outcomes between cholecystectomy on index versus delayed admission for acute cholangitis.

Methods

The 2011–2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify adult patients admitted for acute cholangitis who underwent cholecystectomy. Study cohorts were defined based on timing of surgery. Multivariable regressions and Royston-Parmar time-adjusted analysis were used to evaluate the association of cholecystectomy timing and outcomes.

Results

Of 65,753 patients, 82.0 ​% received surgery on Index and 18.0 ​% on Delayed admissions. Following adjustment, Delayed operation was associated with significantly increased odds of mortality (AOR 1.67 [95 ​% CI 1.10–2.54]), complications (1.25 [1.13–1.40]), repair of bile duct injury (1.66 [1.15–2.41]), conversion to open (1.69 [1.48–1.93]), and 30-day readmission (3.52 [3.21–3.86]). The Delayed cohort experienced a +$14,200 increment in hospitalization costs relative to Index.

Conclusions

Delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholangitis is significantly associated with adverse postoperative outcomes, suggesting that index cholecystectomy may be safe to perform.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全国急性胆管炎胆囊切除术时机选择结果分析
背景:本研究旨在比较急性胆管炎胆囊切除术与延迟入院的结果。方法使用2011-2020年全国再入院数据库,识别因急性胆管炎接受胆囊切除术的成年患者。研究队列是根据手术时间来定义的。采用多变量回归和Royston-Parmar时间调整分析来评估胆囊切除术时机与预后的关系。结果65,753例患者中,82.0%的患者直接接受手术,18.0%的患者延迟接受手术。调整后,延迟手术的死亡率(AOR 1.67 [95% CI 1.10-2.54])、并发症(1.25[1.13-1.40])、胆管损伤修复(1.66[1.15-2.41])、中转开腹(1.69[1.48-1.93])和30天再入院(3.52[3.21-3.86])显著增加。与指数相比,延迟队列的住院费用增加了14 200美元。结论急性胆管炎延迟胆囊切除术与术后不良预后显著相关,提示指数胆囊切除术可能是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of reintervention rates in mesh versus no-mesh inguinal hernia repair using electronic health records Fungating tumors, forgotten patients The suprapubic pseudosac crochet hook suspension technique in laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: An efficient alternative in pseudosac management Investigating optimal warming techniques for hypothermia in a swine model of ischemia Decreased utilization of component separation techniques over time in complex abdominal wall reconstruction following introduction of preoperative botulinum toxin A
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1