The Spatial Variation of Large- and Meso-Scale Plasma Flow Vorticity Statistics in the High-Latitude Ionosphere and Implications for Ionospheric Plasma Flow Models
{"title":"The Spatial Variation of Large- and Meso-Scale Plasma Flow Vorticity Statistics in the High-Latitude Ionosphere and Implications for Ionospheric Plasma Flow Models","authors":"G. Chisham, M. P. Freeman","doi":"10.1029/2024JA032887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ability to understand and model ionospheric plasma flow on all spatial scales has important implications for operational space weather models. This study exploits a recently developed method to statistically separate large-scale and meso-scale contributions to probability density functions (PDFs) of ionospheric flow vorticity measured by the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN). The SuperDARN vorticity data are first sub-divided depending on the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) direction, and the separation method is applied to PDFs of vorticity compiled in spatial regions of size 1° of geomagnetic latitude by 1 hr of magnetic local time, covering much of the high-latitude ionosphere in the northern hemisphere. The resulting PDFs are fit by model functions using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and the spatial variations of the MLE estimators for both the large-scale and meso-scale components are presented. The spatial variations of the large-scale vorticity estimators are ordered by the average ionospheric convection flow, which is highly dependent on the IMF direction. The spatial variations of the meso-scale vorticity estimators appear independent of the senses of vorticity and IMF direction, but have a different character in the polar cap, the cusp, the auroral region, and the sub-auroral region. The paper concludes by discussing the sources of the vorticity components in the different regions, and the consequences for the fidelity of ionospheric plasma flow models.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JA032887","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA032887","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The ability to understand and model ionospheric plasma flow on all spatial scales has important implications for operational space weather models. This study exploits a recently developed method to statistically separate large-scale and meso-scale contributions to probability density functions (PDFs) of ionospheric flow vorticity measured by the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN). The SuperDARN vorticity data are first sub-divided depending on the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) direction, and the separation method is applied to PDFs of vorticity compiled in spatial regions of size 1° of geomagnetic latitude by 1 hr of magnetic local time, covering much of the high-latitude ionosphere in the northern hemisphere. The resulting PDFs are fit by model functions using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and the spatial variations of the MLE estimators for both the large-scale and meso-scale components are presented. The spatial variations of the large-scale vorticity estimators are ordered by the average ionospheric convection flow, which is highly dependent on the IMF direction. The spatial variations of the meso-scale vorticity estimators appear independent of the senses of vorticity and IMF direction, but have a different character in the polar cap, the cusp, the auroral region, and the sub-auroral region. The paper concludes by discussing the sources of the vorticity components in the different regions, and the consequences for the fidelity of ionospheric plasma flow models.