Orthodontists’ perception and attitude toward accelerated orthodontic treatments in Australia

Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.2478/aoj-2024-0017
Amir Hatami, S. Naoum, R. Lee, J. M. Razza, M. Goonewardene
{"title":"Orthodontists’ perception and attitude toward accelerated orthodontic treatments in Australia","authors":"Amir Hatami, S. Naoum, R. Lee, J. M. Razza, M. Goonewardene","doi":"10.2478/aoj-2024-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to survey the perception and attitude of Australian orthodontists toward accelerated orthodontic treatments.\n \n \n \n An online questionnaire was distributed to 427 members of the Australian Society of Orthodontists. The questions related to: clinic demographics, familiarity with appliances/procedures to accelerate orthodontic treatment, the use of appliances/procedures to accelerate orthodontic treatment, and satisfaction with the outcomes when employing these appliances/procedures.\n \n \n \n The response rate was 42.38%. Of the respondents, 26.6% used customised fixed appliances which provided satisfactory outcomes. A small proportion of the respondents routinely used adjunctive procedures to accelerate treatment: 3.5% (n=6) corticotomies, 1.2% (n=2) piezocision, and 1.2% (n=2) intraoral vibrating devices.\n \n \n \n Although a significant number of Australian orthodontists use customised fixed appliances to improve the efficiency of orthodontic treatment, the use of adjunctive procedures to accelerate tooth movement remains very low. Further research is needed to understand the possible limitations and restrictions surrounding this area of practice.\n","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2024-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to survey the perception and attitude of Australian orthodontists toward accelerated orthodontic treatments. An online questionnaire was distributed to 427 members of the Australian Society of Orthodontists. The questions related to: clinic demographics, familiarity with appliances/procedures to accelerate orthodontic treatment, the use of appliances/procedures to accelerate orthodontic treatment, and satisfaction with the outcomes when employing these appliances/procedures. The response rate was 42.38%. Of the respondents, 26.6% used customised fixed appliances which provided satisfactory outcomes. A small proportion of the respondents routinely used adjunctive procedures to accelerate treatment: 3.5% (n=6) corticotomies, 1.2% (n=2) piezocision, and 1.2% (n=2) intraoral vibrating devices. Although a significant number of Australian orthodontists use customised fixed appliances to improve the efficiency of orthodontic treatment, the use of adjunctive procedures to accelerate tooth movement remains very low. Further research is needed to understand the possible limitations and restrictions surrounding this area of practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
澳大利亚正畸医生对加速正畸治疗的看法和态度
这项横断面研究旨在调查澳大利亚正畸医师对加速正畸治疗的看法和态度。 研究人员向澳大利亚正畸医师协会的 427 名会员发放了一份在线问卷。问题涉及:诊所人口统计学、对加速正畸治疗的装置/程序的熟悉程度、加速正畸治疗的装置/程序的使用情况以及对使用这些装置/程序的结果的满意度。 回复率为 42.38%。在受访者中,26.6%的人使用了定制的固定矫治器,并取得了令人满意的效果。一小部分受访者经常使用辅助程序来加速治疗:3.5%(6人)采用皮质切开术,1.2%(2人)采用压电切削术,1.2%(2人)采用口内振动装置。 尽管澳大利亚有很多正畸医生使用定制的固定矫治器来提高正畸治疗的效率,但使用辅助程序来加速牙齿移动的比例仍然很低。要了解这一领域可能存在的局限和限制,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1