Superior outcomes of cementless total hip arthroplasty in elderly osteoarthritis patients: Findings from a 5-year retrospective cohort study

Shahzad Waqas Munazzam , Muhammad Yasin Khan , Shaista Nousheen , Noman Ullah Wazir
{"title":"Superior outcomes of cementless total hip arthroplasty in elderly osteoarthritis patients: Findings from a 5-year retrospective cohort study","authors":"Shahzad Waqas Munazzam ,&nbsp;Muhammad Yasin Khan ,&nbsp;Shaista Nousheen ,&nbsp;Noman Ullah Wazir","doi":"10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common and effective procedure for treating hip osteoarthritis in elderly patients. However, debate persists regarding the optimal fixation method - cemented or cementless. This study aimed to compare outcomes between cemented and cementless THA in elderly patients over a 5-year period.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study analyzed 121 THAs (93 cemented and 28 uncemented) performed on elderly patients (≥50 years) with advanced hip osteoarthritis from April 2018 to October 2023. Outcomes assessed included pain (Visual Analog Scale), functional mobility (WOMAC), postoperative complications, and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Statistical analysis included t-tests and chi-square tests to compare outcomes between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Cementless THA demonstrated significantly better outcomes across all measures at an average follow-up of 36 months. Patients in the cementless group reported lower postoperative pain levels (p &lt; 0.001), improved functional mobility (p &lt; 0.001), fewer complications (p &lt; 0.001), and higher quality of life scores (p &lt; 0.001) compared to the cemented group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study provides strong evidence supporting the superiority of cementless THAover cemented THA in elderly patients with hip osteoarthritis. Cementless fixation resulted in better pain relief, functional outcomes, safety profile, and overall quality of life. These findings suggest that cementless THA should be considered the preferred option for suitable elderly patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100453"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001486/pdfft?md5=025ed0b6cc256584b237cf6a80df300b&pid=1-s2.0-S2773157X24001486-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common and effective procedure for treating hip osteoarthritis in elderly patients. However, debate persists regarding the optimal fixation method - cemented or cementless. This study aimed to compare outcomes between cemented and cementless THA in elderly patients over a 5-year period.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 121 THAs (93 cemented and 28 uncemented) performed on elderly patients (≥50 years) with advanced hip osteoarthritis from April 2018 to October 2023. Outcomes assessed included pain (Visual Analog Scale), functional mobility (WOMAC), postoperative complications, and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Statistical analysis included t-tests and chi-square tests to compare outcomes between groups.

Results

Cementless THA demonstrated significantly better outcomes across all measures at an average follow-up of 36 months. Patients in the cementless group reported lower postoperative pain levels (p < 0.001), improved functional mobility (p < 0.001), fewer complications (p < 0.001), and higher quality of life scores (p < 0.001) compared to the cemented group.

Conclusion

This study provides strong evidence supporting the superiority of cementless THAover cemented THA in elderly patients with hip osteoarthritis. Cementless fixation resulted in better pain relief, functional outcomes, safety profile, and overall quality of life. These findings suggest that cementless THA should be considered the preferred option for suitable elderly patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估有骨水泥与无骨水泥全髋关节置换术:对老年髋关节骨性关节炎的影响 - 5 年队列调查
背景全髋关节置换术(THA)是治疗老年患者髋关节骨性关节炎的一种常见而有效的手术。然而,关于最佳固定方法(有骨水泥或无骨水泥)的争论一直存在。本研究旨在比较老年患者在 5 年内接受有骨水泥和无骨水泥 THA 的疗效。方法这项回顾性队列研究分析了 2018 年 4 月至 2023 年 10 月期间为患有晚期髋关节骨关节炎的老年患者(≥50 岁)实施的 121 例 THA(93 例有骨水泥,28 例无骨水泥)。评估结果包括疼痛(视觉模拟量表)、功能活动度(WOMAC)、术后并发症和生活质量(EQ-5D-5L)。统计分析包括 t 检验和卡方检验,以比较组间结果。与有骨水泥组相比,无骨水泥组患者的术后疼痛程度更低(p <0.001),功能活动度更好(p <0.001),并发症更少(p <0.001),生活质量评分更高(p <0.001)。无骨水泥固定在疼痛缓解、功能效果、安全性和整体生活质量方面都更胜一筹。这些研究结果表明,对于适合接受髋关节置换手术的老年患者来说,无骨水泥 THA 应被视为首选方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calcar referenced tip apex distance (CalTAD) – A better measuring tool to assess lag screw position in pertrochanteric femur fractures treated with twin screw cephalomedullary nails Practical challenges of the concept of using Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the management of pediatric distal radius fractures Comparative analysis of surgical techniques for pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures: A focus on titanium flexible nails versus plates and screws Hip disarticulation for non-salvageable primary malignant sarcoma of femur: What were the oncological & functional outcomes? The effect of the Copenhagen Adduction and Nordic Hamstring exercises on muscle strength and athletic performance: A quasi-experimental study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1