Thromboembolic events in severe postpartum hemorrhage treated with recombinant activated factor VII: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102533
{"title":"Thromboembolic events in severe postpartum hemorrhage treated with recombinant activated factor VII: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is an obstetric complication with high associated morbidity. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is used to treat severe PPH when uterotonics fail to stop bleeding. However, data on the safety of rFVIIa treatment of severe PPH from adequately powered trials are lacking. We systematically reviewed published data on the incidence of thromboembolic events (TEs) in women with PPH treated or not treated with rFVIIa (PROSPERO CRD42022360736). Databases (Embase, MEDLINE, BIOSIS, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Library) were searched for peer-reviewed publications published between January 1996 and August 2022 and conference abstracts published between January 2017 and August 2022 using search terms related to thromboembolism or infarction and PPH. Data were extracted from all publications reporting on a general population of women with PPH with information on TEs. Descriptive summary statistics and the estimated proportion of TEs were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model based on the binomial distribution. Quality assessments were based on the checklist by Downs and Black. From 1637 potentially eligible studies, 55 publications were included reporting on 611 women treated and 32,488 women not treated with rFVIIa. The global estimated proportion of TEs was 1.82% (prediction interval [PI], 0.30-10.23) and 0.72% (PI, 0.03-16.47) in women with severe PPH treated and those not treated with rFVIIa, respectively. The estimated proportions of TEs were similarly small, with wide and largely overlapping PIs. Additional well-designed trials are needed to improve understanding of TE incidence in PPH.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924002280/pdfft?md5=be0da4bab78466826c5464518f53f215&pid=1-s2.0-S2475037924002280-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924002280","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is an obstetric complication with high associated morbidity. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is used to treat severe PPH when uterotonics fail to stop bleeding. However, data on the safety of rFVIIa treatment of severe PPH from adequately powered trials are lacking. We systematically reviewed published data on the incidence of thromboembolic events (TEs) in women with PPH treated or not treated with rFVIIa (PROSPERO CRD42022360736). Databases (Embase, MEDLINE, BIOSIS, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Library) were searched for peer-reviewed publications published between January 1996 and August 2022 and conference abstracts published between January 2017 and August 2022 using search terms related to thromboembolism or infarction and PPH. Data were extracted from all publications reporting on a general population of women with PPH with information on TEs. Descriptive summary statistics and the estimated proportion of TEs were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model based on the binomial distribution. Quality assessments were based on the checklist by Downs and Black. From 1637 potentially eligible studies, 55 publications were included reporting on 611 women treated and 32,488 women not treated with rFVIIa. The global estimated proportion of TEs was 1.82% (prediction interval [PI], 0.30-10.23) and 0.72% (PI, 0.03-16.47) in women with severe PPH treated and those not treated with rFVIIa, respectively. The estimated proportions of TEs were similarly small, with wide and largely overlapping PIs. Additional well-designed trials are needed to improve understanding of TE incidence in PPH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用重组活化因子 VII 治疗严重产后出血的血栓栓塞事件:系统性文献综述和荟萃分析
产后出血(PPH)是一种相关发病率很高的产科并发症。当子宫收缩剂无法止血时,重组活化因子 VII(rFVIIa)可用于治疗严重的 PPH。然而,目前还缺乏充分有效的试验数据来说明 rFVIIa 治疗重度 PPH 的安全性。我们系统回顾了已发表的有关 PPH 妇女接受或未接受 rFVIIa 治疗的血栓栓塞事件(TE)发生率的数据(PROSPERO CRD42022360736)。使用与血栓栓塞或梗塞和 PPH 相关的检索词检索了 1996 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月间发表的同行评审出版物和 2017 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月间发表的会议摘要数据库(Embase、MEDLINE、BIOSIS、Current Contents 和 Cochrane Library)。我们从所有报道PPH女性一般人群的出版物中提取了有关TE的数据。采用基于二项分布的广义线性混合模型对描述性摘要统计和TE的估计比例进行分析。质量评估以Downs和Black的核对表为基础。从 1637 项可能符合条件的研究中,纳入了 55 篇出版物,报告了 611 名接受过 rFVIIa 治疗的女性和 32,488 名未接受过 rFVIIa 治疗的女性。在接受和未接受 rFVIIa 治疗的重度 PPH 患者中,TE 的总体估计比例分别为 1.82%(预测区间 [PI],0.30-10.23)和 0.72%(预测区间 [PI],0.03-16.47)。TE的估计比例同样较小,PI较宽且基本重叠。要进一步了解 PPH 中 TE 的发生率,还需要进行更多设计良好的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
212
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
The risk of venous thromboembolism in primary central nervous system lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Is lupus anticoagulant testing with dilute Russell’s viper venom clotting times reliable in the presence of inflammation? Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of low doses of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator to establish a model for biosimilarity comparisons Physician practice patterns on the use of inferior vena cava filters in venous thromboembolism Erratum to ‘Performance of Risk Scores in Predicting Major Bleeding in Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) Recipients: a Comparative External Validation. ’[Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024;8:e102437]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1