Evolving trends in CT colonography: A 10-year analysis of use and associated factors

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical Imaging Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110241
{"title":"Evolving trends in CT colonography: A 10-year analysis of use and associated factors","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC) with high sensitivity and low risk of complications. We used a nationally representative sample of screening-eligible adults to examine trends in and factors associated with CTC use.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We examined CTC use among 58,058 adults in the National Health Interview Survey in 2010, 2015, 2018, 2019, and 2021. For each survey year, we estimated CTC use by sociodemographic and health factors. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with CTC use.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1.7 % adults reported receiving CTC across all survey years. CTC use was similar in 2010 (1.3 %), 2015 (0.8 %), 2018 (1.4 %), and 2019 (1.4 %) but increased in 2021 (3.5 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). In multivariable analysis, survey year 2021 [vs. 2010, odds ratio (OR) 2.51, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.83–3.43], Hispanic (OR 1.73, 95 % CI 1.34–2.23), non-Hispanic Black (OR 2.07, 95 % CI 1.67–2.57), and household income &lt;200 % federal poverty level (vs. &gt;400 %, OR 1.25, 95 % CI 1.01–1.57) was associated with CTC use. Further, adults with a history of diabetes (OR 1.20, 95 % CI 1.01–1.45), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.58, 95 % CI 1.25–1.99), cancer (OR 1.29, 95 % CI 1.05–1.58), or past-year hospital admissions (OR 1.44, 95 % CI 1.18–1.78) were more likely to receive CTC.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CTC use remained low from 2010 to 2019 but increased in 2021. CTC use was more frequent among adults with chronic health conditions, minorities, and adults with lower income, and may help reduce disparities in CRC screening.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124001712","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC) with high sensitivity and low risk of complications. We used a nationally representative sample of screening-eligible adults to examine trends in and factors associated with CTC use.

Methods

We examined CTC use among 58,058 adults in the National Health Interview Survey in 2010, 2015, 2018, 2019, and 2021. For each survey year, we estimated CTC use by sociodemographic and health factors. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with CTC use.

Results

A total of 1.7 % adults reported receiving CTC across all survey years. CTC use was similar in 2010 (1.3 %), 2015 (0.8 %), 2018 (1.4 %), and 2019 (1.4 %) but increased in 2021 (3.5 %, p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, survey year 2021 [vs. 2010, odds ratio (OR) 2.51, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.83–3.43], Hispanic (OR 1.73, 95 % CI 1.34–2.23), non-Hispanic Black (OR 2.07, 95 % CI 1.67–2.57), and household income <200 % federal poverty level (vs. >400 %, OR 1.25, 95 % CI 1.01–1.57) was associated with CTC use. Further, adults with a history of diabetes (OR 1.20, 95 % CI 1.01–1.45), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.58, 95 % CI 1.25–1.99), cancer (OR 1.29, 95 % CI 1.05–1.58), or past-year hospital admissions (OR 1.44, 95 % CI 1.18–1.78) were more likely to receive CTC.

Conclusion

CTC use remained low from 2010 to 2019 but increased in 2021. CTC use was more frequent among adults with chronic health conditions, minorities, and adults with lower income, and may help reduce disparities in CRC screening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CT 结肠造影术的发展趋势:对使用情况和相关因素的 10 年分析
目的 计算机断层扫描结肠成像(CTC)是一种无创的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查检查,具有灵敏度高、并发症风险低的特点。我们利用具有全国代表性的符合筛查条件的成年人样本,研究了 CTC 使用趋势及相关因素。方法 我们研究了 2010、2015、2018、2019 和 2021 年全国健康访谈调查中 58,058 名成年人的 CTC 使用情况。在每个调查年份,我们都根据社会人口和健康因素估算了 CTC 的使用情况。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来确定与 CTC 使用相关的因素。结果在所有调查年份中,共有 1.7% 的成年人报告接受了 CTC。CTC 使用率在 2010 年(1.3%)、2015 年(0.8%)、2018 年(1.4%)和 2019 年(1.4%)相似,但在 2021 年有所增加(3.5%,p <0.05)。在多变量分析中,调查年份 2021 [vs. 2010, odds ratio (OR) 2.51, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.83-3.43]、西班牙裔(OR 1.73, 95 % CI 1.34-2.23)、非西班牙裔黑人(OR 2.07, 95 % CI 1.67-2.57)和家庭收入 <200 % 联邦贫困水平(vs. >400 %, OR 1.25, 95 % CI 1.01-1.57)与 CTC 的使用有关。此外,有糖尿病史(OR 1.20,95 % CI 1.01-1.45)、慢性阻塞性肺病(OR 1.58,95 % CI 1.25-1.99)、癌症(OR 1.29,95 % CI 1.05-1.58)或过去一年入院(OR 1.44,95 % CI 1.18-1.78)的成年人更有可能接受 CTC。慢性病患者、少数民族和低收入成年人更经常使用 CTC,这可能有助于减少 CRC 筛查中的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
期刊最新文献
Women in Radiology Education (WIRED): An actionable step towards closing the gender gap in radiology. Contents Heart lung axis in acute pulmonary embolism: Role of CT in risk stratification Clinical experience on the limited role of ultrasound for breast cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations carriers aged 30–39 years Factors affecting mammogram breast cancer surveillance effectiveness in the ipsilateral and contralateral breast
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1