A framework for using community determined iconic species to advance socio-ecology connections and promote nature-based solutions

Peter J. Davies , Carl Tippler
{"title":"A framework for using community determined iconic species to advance socio-ecology connections and promote nature-based solutions","authors":"Peter J. Davies ,&nbsp;Carl Tippler","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The community value and resonate with some species and ecological systems more than others and therefore can be used to engender broader public support for nature positive outcomes. Yet many of these are not the scientifically-derived indicator species or ecological communities used by conservation scientists to determine and report on the pressures or condition of the environment nor by those implementing programs or actions needed to reverse biodiversity loss. Urban environments represent the intersection of two complex systems, human and natural, and yet this socio-ecological or coupled human-natural system nexus remains elusive within conservation law and policy and the dominant paradigm of grey infrastructure in cities. New approaches are needed to tether environmental policies and practices, such as nature based solutions, to the values and interests of individuals and their place. This article offers a novel framework through which nature-based solutions may achieve policy traction when tied to iconic species that the community value. The iconic species framework is founded on validity theory and the relevance of community-selected species in supporting nature positive outcomes. In parallel, the framework satisfies the data driven outcomes on which science and conservation policy relies upon and the use controls that direct nature-based rather than conventional engineering approaches. The iconic species framework is situated between the indicator species framework, whereby taxa are selected on the basis of their ecological sensitivity, and flagship species, that are largely emblematic. It links numerous ecological and environmental requirements of the species that are preferred by the community to develop nature-positive policy and practice outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277241152400051X/pdfft?md5=d817f395455d120fdd33ce2d0fff8846&pid=1-s2.0-S277241152400051X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277241152400051X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The community value and resonate with some species and ecological systems more than others and therefore can be used to engender broader public support for nature positive outcomes. Yet many of these are not the scientifically-derived indicator species or ecological communities used by conservation scientists to determine and report on the pressures or condition of the environment nor by those implementing programs or actions needed to reverse biodiversity loss. Urban environments represent the intersection of two complex systems, human and natural, and yet this socio-ecological or coupled human-natural system nexus remains elusive within conservation law and policy and the dominant paradigm of grey infrastructure in cities. New approaches are needed to tether environmental policies and practices, such as nature based solutions, to the values and interests of individuals and their place. This article offers a novel framework through which nature-based solutions may achieve policy traction when tied to iconic species that the community value. The iconic species framework is founded on validity theory and the relevance of community-selected species in supporting nature positive outcomes. In parallel, the framework satisfies the data driven outcomes on which science and conservation policy relies upon and the use controls that direct nature-based rather than conventional engineering approaches. The iconic species framework is situated between the indicator species framework, whereby taxa are selected on the basis of their ecological sensitivity, and flagship species, that are largely emblematic. It links numerous ecological and environmental requirements of the species that are preferred by the community to develop nature-positive policy and practice outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用社区确定的标志性物种推进社会生态联系和促进基于自然的解决方案的框架
社区对某些物种和生态系统的重视程度和共鸣程度高于其他物种和生态系 统,因此可用于吸引更广泛的公众支持自然的积极成果。然而,这些物种或生态群落中的许多并不是从科学角度得出的指标物种或生态群落,既不是保护科学家用来确定和报告环境压力或状况的指标物种或生态群落,也不是那些实施扭转生物多样性丧失所需的计划或行动的人所使用的指标物种或生态群落。城市环境代表了人类和自然两个复杂系统的交汇点,然而这种社会-生态或人类-自然系统的耦合关系在保护法律和政策以及城市灰色基础设施的主流模式中仍然难以捉摸。我们需要新的方法将环境政策和实践(如基于自然的解决方案)与个人及其所在地的价值和利益联系起来。本文提供了一个新颖的框架,通过该框架,将基于自然的解决方案与社区所珍视的标志性物种联系在一起,可实现政策牵引力。标志性物种框架的基础是有效性理论以及社区选择的物种在支持自然积极成果方面的相关性。与此同时,该框架还满足了科学和保护政策所依赖的数据驱动成果,以及指导基于自然而非传统工程方法的使用控制。标志性物种框架介于指示性物种框架和旗舰物种之间,指示性物种框架根据类群的生态敏感性进行选择,旗舰物种则主要具有象征意义。它将社区首选物种的众多生态和环境要求联系起来,以制定积极的自然政策和实践成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Money talks. A systems perspective on funding and financing barriers to nature-based solutions Exploring social contracts of disaster risk through twitter narratives during a major storm A transformations framework for mainstreaming a nature-based solutions approach Cost-benefit and equity analysis of nature-based solutions in Haiti, India, Indonesia and Uganda “Financing urban Nature-based Solutions (NBS): A literature review from the perspective of funders”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1