Exploring the Effect of Preamputation Employment and Income on Ambulation in Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputees After Amputee Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

{"title":"Exploring the Effect of Preamputation Employment and Income on Ambulation in Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputees After Amputee Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the relationship between 2-minute walk test (2MWT) distance, employment status, and median household income in adult dysvascular amputee patients after a 6-week rehabilitation program.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Amputation rehabilitation program.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>In total, 505 patients were included in the analysis. Most (71.1%) were men and had below-knee amputations (78.3%); the average age was 65.3±11.6 years.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>2MWT distance at discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Men <em>(</em>68.3±32.6m) and below-knee amputation amputees (70.9±32.0m) walked significantly further than women <em>(</em>58.8±30.0m; <em>P</em>=.003) and above-knee amputees <em>(</em>47.2±25.7m; <em>P</em>&lt;.001), respectively. A significant negative correlation was found between 2MWT distance and age (<em>r</em>=−.32; <em>P</em>&lt;.001) as well as time from consultation to admission (<em>r</em>=−.23; <em>P</em>&lt;.001). An unadjusted general linear model (GLM) revealed that employment status (F<sub>2,446</sub>=17.47; <em>P</em>&lt;.001) but not income (F<sub>4,446</sub>=.714; <em>P</em>=.58) was statistically significantly associated with 2MWT distance. An adjusted (age, sex, time from consult to admission, and amputation level) GLM revealed employment status remained significant (F<sub>2,434</sub>=5.59; <em>P</em>=.004) and income remained insignificant (F<sub>4,434</sub>=.43; <em>P</em>=.784). Differences in 2MWT distance between employment and income groups did not meet clinical significance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Preamputation employment appears to be associated with postrehabilitation outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000570/pdfft?md5=2a6754f955226bc5e15fbba0bdd96e08&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109524000570-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the relationship between 2-minute walk test (2MWT) distance, employment status, and median household income in adult dysvascular amputee patients after a 6-week rehabilitation program.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Amputation rehabilitation program.

Participants

In total, 505 patients were included in the analysis. Most (71.1%) were men and had below-knee amputations (78.3%); the average age was 65.3±11.6 years.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

2MWT distance at discharge.

Results

Men (68.3±32.6m) and below-knee amputation amputees (70.9±32.0m) walked significantly further than women (58.8±30.0m; P=.003) and above-knee amputees (47.2±25.7m; P<.001), respectively. A significant negative correlation was found between 2MWT distance and age (r=−.32; P<.001) as well as time from consultation to admission (r=−.23; P<.001). An unadjusted general linear model (GLM) revealed that employment status (F2,446=17.47; P<.001) but not income (F4,446=.714; P=.58) was statistically significantly associated with 2MWT distance. An adjusted (age, sex, time from consult to admission, and amputation level) GLM revealed employment status remained significant (F2,434=5.59; P=.004) and income remained insignificant (F4,434=.43; P=.784). Differences in 2MWT distance between employment and income groups did not meet clinical significance.

Conclusions

Preamputation employment appears to be associated with postrehabilitation outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨截肢前的就业和收入对截肢康复后血管障碍下肢截肢者行走的影响:回顾性队列研究
目的评估成年血管性截肢患者在接受为期 6 周的康复计划后,其 2 分钟步行测试(2MWT)距离、就业状况和家庭收入中位数之间的关系。大多数(71.1%)为男性,膝下截肢(78.3%);平均年龄为(65.3±11.6)岁.干预措施不适用.主要结果测量出院时的2MWT距离.结果男性(68.结果男性(68.3±32.6m)和膝下截肢者(70.9±32.0m)的步行距离分别显著高于女性(58.8±30.0m;P=.003)和膝上截肢者(47.2±25.7m;P<.001)。2MWT距离与年龄(r=-.32;P<;.001)以及从就诊到入院的时间(r=-.23;P<;.001)之间存在明显的负相关。未经调整的一般线性模型(GLM)显示,就业状况(F2,446=17.47;P<.001)而非收入(F4,446=.714;P=.58)与 2MWT 距离有显著的统计学相关性。调整后(年龄、性别、从就诊到入院的时间和截肢程度)的 GLM 显示,就业状况仍具有显著性(F2,434=5.59;P=.004),而收入仍无显著性(F4,434=.43;P=.784)。就业组和收入组之间的 2MWT 距离差异未达到临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Applying a Motivational Instructional Design Model to Stroke Rehabilitation: A Feasibility Study on Occupational and Swallowing Therapies Effects of Pilates on Body Posture: A Systematic Review Randomized Trial to Evaluate Effects of Peer- and Clinician-Led Interventions for Caregivers of Individuals With Acquired Brain Injury Creation of a Limb Loss and Preservation Registry for Improving the Quality of Patient Care in the United States Comparison of Diagnosis-Related Group Rehabilitation Reimbursement Payments With Those of a Novel Patient Classification-Based Payment System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1