Identification of postpartum symptom informedness and preparedness typologies and their associations with psychological health: A latent class analysis

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104115
Jihye Kim Scroggins , Katharine E. Bruce , Alison M. Stuebe , Jenifer O. Fahey , Kristin P. Tully
{"title":"Identification of postpartum symptom informedness and preparedness typologies and their associations with psychological health: A latent class analysis","authors":"Jihye Kim Scroggins ,&nbsp;Katharine E. Bruce ,&nbsp;Alison M. Stuebe ,&nbsp;Jenifer O. Fahey ,&nbsp;Kristin P. Tully","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Birthing parents, defined as postpartum women and people with various gender identities who give birth, commonly experience challenging postpartum symptoms. However, many report feeling uninformed and unprepared to navigate their postpartum health.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify typologies of postpartum symptom informedness and preparedness using latent class analysis (LCA) and to examine the associated patient and healthcare characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used survey data from a large, multi-method, longitudinal research project Postnatal Safety Learning Lab. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling and enrolled between November 2020 and June 2021. LCA was used to identify subgroups of birthing parents with different symptom informedness and preparedness using 10 binary variables (<em>N</em> = 148). Bivariate analysis was conducted to examine the association between characteristics and each typology.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The 3-class models had better fit indices and interpretability for both informedness and preparedness typologies: High, High-moderate, and Moderate-low. The sample characteristics were different by typologies. In the modified discrimination in medical settings assessment, we found higher discrimination scores in the moderate-low informedness and preparedness typologies. The moderate-low preparedness typology had a higher percentage of birthing parents who did not have private insurance, underwent cesarean section, and planned for formula or mixed infant feeding. The median PHQ-4 scores at 4 weeks postpartum were lower among those in high informedness and preparedness typologies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In our sample, 18 to 21 % of birthing parents were in the moderate-low informedness or preparedness typologies. Future research and practice should consider providing tailored information and anticipatory guidance as a part of more equitable and supportive care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 104115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824001980","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Birthing parents, defined as postpartum women and people with various gender identities who give birth, commonly experience challenging postpartum symptoms. However, many report feeling uninformed and unprepared to navigate their postpartum health.

Objective

To identify typologies of postpartum symptom informedness and preparedness using latent class analysis (LCA) and to examine the associated patient and healthcare characteristics.

Methods

We used survey data from a large, multi-method, longitudinal research project Postnatal Safety Learning Lab. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling and enrolled between November 2020 and June 2021. LCA was used to identify subgroups of birthing parents with different symptom informedness and preparedness using 10 binary variables (N = 148). Bivariate analysis was conducted to examine the association between characteristics and each typology.

Findings

The 3-class models had better fit indices and interpretability for both informedness and preparedness typologies: High, High-moderate, and Moderate-low. The sample characteristics were different by typologies. In the modified discrimination in medical settings assessment, we found higher discrimination scores in the moderate-low informedness and preparedness typologies. The moderate-low preparedness typology had a higher percentage of birthing parents who did not have private insurance, underwent cesarean section, and planned for formula or mixed infant feeding. The median PHQ-4 scores at 4 weeks postpartum were lower among those in high informedness and preparedness typologies.

Conclusion

In our sample, 18 to 21 % of birthing parents were in the moderate-low informedness or preparedness typologies. Future research and practice should consider providing tailored information and anticipatory guidance as a part of more equitable and supportive care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别产后症状知情和准备类型及其与心理健康的关系:潜类分析
背景分娩父母是指产后妇女和具有不同性别身份的分娩者,他们通常会经历具有挑战性的产后症状。目标使用潜类分析(LCA)确定产后症状知情度和准备度的类型,并研究相关的患者和医疗保健特征。方法我们使用了大型、多方法、纵向研究项目 "产后安全学习实验室 "的调查数据。我们采用便利抽样的方式招募参与者,并在 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 6 月期间注册。采用 LCA 方法,利用 10 个二元变量(N = 148)识别出症状知情度和准备程度不同的分娩父母亚群。对每个类型的特征之间的关联进行了双变量分析。研究结果对于知情度和准备度类型,三类模型具有更好的拟合指数和可解释性:高、高-中和中-低。不同类型的样本特征各不相同。在修改后的医疗环境辨别力评估中,我们发现中低知情度和准备度类型的辨别力得分较高。在中低准备度类型中,没有私人保险、接受剖腹产手术、计划用配方奶粉或混合奶粉喂养婴儿的分娩父母比例较高。结论在我们的样本中,18% 到 21% 的分娩父母属于中低知情度或准备度类型。未来的研究和实践应考虑提供有针对性的信息和预期指导,作为更公平和支持性护理的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
The work of midwives: The socio-institutional theory of the meaning of midwives’ work-life balance International News January 2025 “With an unwanted pregnancy, we are looking for midwives in the neighbourhood to show us what to do.” Stakeholder perceptions of midwife-led woman-centred comprehensive abortion care in the province of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo: a qualitative descriptive study The future of midwifery care and education in Belgium: A discussion paper. Effectiveness of supporting lifestyle change in pregnant mothers with obesity through the wearable internet-of-things (SLIM) -intervention on self-efficacy in weight management in pregnant women: A quasi-experimental trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1