"If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it". Outcome measures in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: current and future perspectives.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Acta neurologica Belgica Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1007/s13760-024-02600-2
Silvia Benemei, Francesca Gatto, Luca Boni, Marika Pane
{"title":"\"If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it\". Outcome measures in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: current and future perspectives.","authors":"Silvia Benemei, Francesca Gatto, Luca Boni, Marika Pane","doi":"10.1007/s13760-024-02600-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked recessive neuromuscular disorder primarily affecting males, caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene. The absence of dystrophin protein leads to progressive skeletal muscle degeneration. Recent advances in the therapeutic landscape underscore the need to identify appropriate outcome measures to assess treatment efficacy in ambulant and non-ambulant DMD patients, across clinical and research settings. This is essential for accurately evaluating new treatments and attributing therapeutic benefits.It is crucial to establish a robust correlation between outcome scores and disease progression patterns. This task is challenging since functional test performance may be influenced by different patient's characteristics, including the physiological evolution of the neurodevelopment together with the disease progression. While widely used DMD outcomes such as the North Star Ambulatory Assessment, the 6-Minute Walking Test, the 4 stairs climbed, and the Performance of the Upper Limb exhibit reliability and validity, their clinical significance is influenced by the wide phenotype and progression variability of the disease.We present and discuss the features (relevance, quantifiability, validity, objectivity, reliability, sensitivity, specificity, precision) of available DMD outcome measures, including new potential measures that may be provided by digital tools and artificial intelligence.</p>","PeriodicalId":7042,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-024-02600-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked recessive neuromuscular disorder primarily affecting males, caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene. The absence of dystrophin protein leads to progressive skeletal muscle degeneration. Recent advances in the therapeutic landscape underscore the need to identify appropriate outcome measures to assess treatment efficacy in ambulant and non-ambulant DMD patients, across clinical and research settings. This is essential for accurately evaluating new treatments and attributing therapeutic benefits.It is crucial to establish a robust correlation between outcome scores and disease progression patterns. This task is challenging since functional test performance may be influenced by different patient's characteristics, including the physiological evolution of the neurodevelopment together with the disease progression. While widely used DMD outcomes such as the North Star Ambulatory Assessment, the 6-Minute Walking Test, the 4 stairs climbed, and the Performance of the Upper Limb exhibit reliability and validity, their clinical significance is influenced by the wide phenotype and progression variability of the disease.We present and discuss the features (relevance, quantifiability, validity, objectivity, reliability, sensitivity, specificity, precision) of available DMD outcome measures, including new potential measures that may be provided by digital tools and artificial intelligence.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
杜兴氏肌肉萎缩症的结果测量。
杜兴氏肌肉萎缩症(DMD)是一种主要影响男性的 X 连锁隐性神经肌肉疾病,由肌营养不良蛋白基因突变引起。缺乏肌营养不良蛋白会导致骨骼肌进行性退化。治疗领域的最新进展突出表明,有必要在临床和研究环境中确定适当的结果测量方法,以评估行动自如和非行动自如的 DMD 患者的治疗效果。这对于准确评估新疗法和治疗效果至关重要。这项任务具有挑战性,因为功能测试表现可能受到不同患者特征的影响,包括神经发育的生理演变和疾病进展。我们介绍并讨论了现有 DMD 结果测量的特点(相关性、可量化性、有效性、客观性、可靠性、敏感性、特异性、精确性),包括数字工具和人工智能可能提供的新的潜在测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta neurologica Belgica
Acta neurologica Belgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer-reviewed and published quarterly, Acta Neurologica Belgicapresents original articles in the clinical and basic neurosciences, and also reports the proceedings and the abstracts of the scientific meetings of the different partner societies. The contents include commentaries, editorials, review articles, case reports, neuro-images of interest, book reviews and letters to the editor. Acta Neurologica Belgica is the official journal of the following national societies: Belgian Neurological Society Belgian Society for Neuroscience Belgian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology Belgian Pediatric Neurology Society Belgian Study Group of Multiple Sclerosis Belgian Stroke Council Belgian Headache Society Belgian Study Group of Neuropathology
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editor regarding "Postoperative elevated bed header position versus supine in the management of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis" by Ibrahim Serag et al. Strength and dexterity of less affected hand of children with unilateral cerebral palsy: a comparison study with normal peers. Ocular myasthenia gravis and thyroid eye disease: double trouble. Effect of arm ergometer versus stabilization exercises on trunk control and pper extremity functions in children with diplegia: a randomized controlled trial. Paroxysmal dysarthria caused by cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1