The role of basophil activation test in venom ımmunotherapy: comparative evaluation with specific IgE and skin prick tests, ınnovative approaches.

S I Kokcu Karadag, S Özen Çökelez, E Bekar Çepniler, E Abdullayev, O Terzi, D Özçeker, R Sancak, A Yıldıran
{"title":"The role of basophil activation test in venom ımmunotherapy: comparative evaluation with specific IgE and skin prick tests, ınnovative approaches.","authors":"S I Kokcu Karadag, S Özen Çökelez, E Bekar Çepniler, E Abdullayev, O Terzi, D Özçeker, R Sancak, A Yıldıran","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> In diagnosing insect venom allergy and making immunotherapy decisions, clinical history, skin tests, and specific serum IgE levels are commonly utilized. This study aims to emphasize the clinical significance of using the basophil activation test in accurately identifying sensitivities in individuals with insect venom allergy and to compare its effectiveness with other testing methods. <b>Methods.</b> This study included a total of 43 patients, who experienced at least one systemic allergic reaction following insect stings and were deemed suitable for immunotherapy.Basophil activation test, specific serum IgE levels, and skin prick test results utilized in making immunotherapy treatment decisions were recorded. <b>Results.</b> Our study determined that the overall clinical sensitivities of the basophil activation test (BAT), specific serum IgE (spIgE), and skin prick test (SPT) for apis mellifera were 95.5%, 95.7%, and 48.4% respectively, while for vespula vulgaris, they were 83.3%, 100%, and 33.3%. Based on these results, the prediction of systemic reactions to bee stings is ordered as spIgE > BAT > SPT. Additionally, early-stage skin prick tests showed a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 50% at a cut-off value of 1.5 mm, and 33% sensitivity and 83% specificity at 2.5 mm. <b>Conclusions.</b> This study demonstrates that the basophil activation test (BAT) can provide a high positive predictive value in immunotherapy treatment decisions and offer significant insights in clinical practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Background. In diagnosing insect venom allergy and making immunotherapy decisions, clinical history, skin tests, and specific serum IgE levels are commonly utilized. This study aims to emphasize the clinical significance of using the basophil activation test in accurately identifying sensitivities in individuals with insect venom allergy and to compare its effectiveness with other testing methods. Methods. This study included a total of 43 patients, who experienced at least one systemic allergic reaction following insect stings and were deemed suitable for immunotherapy.Basophil activation test, specific serum IgE levels, and skin prick test results utilized in making immunotherapy treatment decisions were recorded. Results. Our study determined that the overall clinical sensitivities of the basophil activation test (BAT), specific serum IgE (spIgE), and skin prick test (SPT) for apis mellifera were 95.5%, 95.7%, and 48.4% respectively, while for vespula vulgaris, they were 83.3%, 100%, and 33.3%. Based on these results, the prediction of systemic reactions to bee stings is ordered as spIgE > BAT > SPT. Additionally, early-stage skin prick tests showed a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 50% at a cut-off value of 1.5 mm, and 33% sensitivity and 83% specificity at 2.5 mm. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that the basophil activation test (BAT) can provide a high positive predictive value in immunotherapy treatment decisions and offer significant insights in clinical practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验在毒液免疫疗法中的作用:与特异性 IgE 和皮肤点刺试验的比较评估,创新方法。
摘要:背景。在诊断昆虫毒液过敏和做出免疫疗法决定时,通常会使用临床病史、皮肤测试和特异性血清 IgE 水平。本研究旨在强调使用嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验准确鉴定昆虫毒液过敏患者敏感性的临床意义,并比较其与其他试验方法的有效性。方法。本研究共纳入了 43 名患者,他们在被昆虫蜇伤后至少出现过一次全身过敏反应,并被认为适合接受免疫疗法。本研究记录了嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验、特异性血清 IgE 水平和皮肤点刺试验结果,这些结果被用于免疫疗法的治疗决策。结果我们的研究确定,嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验(BAT)、特异性血清 IgE(spIgE)和皮肤点刺试验(SPT)对蚜虫的总体临床敏感度分别为 95.5%、95.7% 和 48.4%,而对蚜虫的敏感度分别为 83.3%、100% 和 33.3%。根据这些结果,预测蜂蜇后全身反应的顺序为 spIgE > BAT > SPT。此外,早期皮肤点刺试验在截断值为 1.5 毫米时的灵敏度为 67%,特异性为 50%;在截断值为 2.5 毫米时的灵敏度为 33%,特异性为 83%。结论本研究表明,嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验(BAT)可为免疫疗法治疗决策提供较高的阳性预测值,并为临床实践提供重要启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
期刊最新文献
Is gastrointestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction the only responsible for sensitization to food allergens? Sleep breathing disorders in adolescents with asthma. Severe chronic spontaneous urticaria responding and not responding to omalizumab: analysis of the prognostic value of known and novel in-vitro variables. The added value of targeting airway hyperresponsiveness by blocking TSLP in the management of severe asthma. Assessment of concentrations of multidirectional omega-3 fatty acids in inborn errors of immunity with predominantly antibody defects: a pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1