Steroidomics-Based Screening for Primary Aldosteronism: Impact of antihypertensive Drugs.

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23029
Georgiana Constantinescu, Sven Gruber, Sybille Fuld, Mirko Peitzsch, Manuel Schulze, Hanna Remde, Lydia Kürzinger, Jun Yang, Tina Yen, Tracy Ann Williams, Lisa Müller, Martin Reincke, Jacques W M Lenders, Felix Beuschlein, Christina Pamporaki, Graeme F Eisenhofer
{"title":"Steroidomics-Based Screening for Primary Aldosteronism: Impact of antihypertensive Drugs.","authors":"Georgiana Constantinescu, Sven Gruber, Sybille Fuld, Mirko Peitzsch, Manuel Schulze, Hanna Remde, Lydia Kürzinger, Jun Yang, Tina Yen, Tracy Ann Williams, Lisa Müller, Martin Reincke, Jacques W M Lenders, Felix Beuschlein, Christina Pamporaki, Graeme F Eisenhofer","doi":"10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) is complicated by the need to withdraw antihypertensive medications that interfere with test results, particularly renin. This study examined whether machine learning-based steroid-probability scores offer a renin measurement-independent approach for testing less prone to interference than the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective multicenter cohort study involved the use of plasma steroidomics and the ARR in 839 patients tested for PA, including 190 with and 578 without PA (71 indeterminate). Receiver operating characteristic curves for steroid-probability scores and the ARR were examined with and without interfering medications. Impacts of individual medications on plasma aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, 18-hydroxycortisol, steroid-probability scores, renin, and ARRs were examined by multivariable and paired analyses in patients with and without PA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Receiver operating characteristic curves indicated a significant impact of interfering antihypertensive medications on the diagnostic performance of the ARR and minimal impact on steroid-probability scores. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists increased plasma aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and 18-hydroxycortisol in patients without PA and resulted in false-positive test results for steroid-probability scores and false-negative results for the ARR. Diuretics increased aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and steroid-probability scores in patients without PA, whereas angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors decreased aldosterone, steroid-probability scores, and ARRs. Beta-adrenoceptor blockers, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin receptor blockers had negligible impact on mineralocorticoids and steroid-probability scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among antihypertensive drugs that impact plasma aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and 18-hydroxycortisol, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists stood out as a cause of false-positive results for derived steroid-probability scores. Other antihypertensives have minimal or no impact, an advantage for use of steroid-probability scores over the ARR when those medications cannot be withdrawn.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00017084; Unique identifier: DRKS00017084.</p>","PeriodicalId":13042,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"2060-2071"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) is complicated by the need to withdraw antihypertensive medications that interfere with test results, particularly renin. This study examined whether machine learning-based steroid-probability scores offer a renin measurement-independent approach for testing less prone to interference than the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR).

Methods: This prospective multicenter cohort study involved the use of plasma steroidomics and the ARR in 839 patients tested for PA, including 190 with and 578 without PA (71 indeterminate). Receiver operating characteristic curves for steroid-probability scores and the ARR were examined with and without interfering medications. Impacts of individual medications on plasma aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, 18-hydroxycortisol, steroid-probability scores, renin, and ARRs were examined by multivariable and paired analyses in patients with and without PA.

Results: Receiver operating characteristic curves indicated a significant impact of interfering antihypertensive medications on the diagnostic performance of the ARR and minimal impact on steroid-probability scores. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists increased plasma aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and 18-hydroxycortisol in patients without PA and resulted in false-positive test results for steroid-probability scores and false-negative results for the ARR. Diuretics increased aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and steroid-probability scores in patients without PA, whereas angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors decreased aldosterone, steroid-probability scores, and ARRs. Beta-adrenoceptor blockers, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin receptor blockers had negligible impact on mineralocorticoids and steroid-probability scores.

Conclusions: Among antihypertensive drugs that impact plasma aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and 18-hydroxycortisol, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists stood out as a cause of false-positive results for derived steroid-probability scores. Other antihypertensives have minimal or no impact, an advantage for use of steroid-probability scores over the ARR when those medications cannot be withdrawn.

Registration: URL: https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00017084; Unique identifier: DRKS00017084.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于类固醇组学的原发性醛固酮增多症筛查:抗高血压药物的影响。
背景:原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)的诊断因需要停用会干扰检测结果(尤其是肾素)的抗高血压药物而变得复杂。本研究探讨了基于机器学习的类固醇概率评分是否提供了一种与肾素测量无关的检测方法,该方法比醛固酮肾素比值(ARR)更不容易受到干扰:这项前瞻性多中心队列研究使用血浆类固醇组学和 ARR 对 839 例 PA 患者进行了检测,其中包括 190 例 PA 患者和 578 例无 PA 患者(71 例不确定)。在使用和不使用干扰药物的情况下,研究人员对类固醇概率评分和 ARR 的接收者操作特征曲线进行了研究。在有 PA 和无 PA 的患者中,通过多变量和配对分析研究了各种药物对血浆醛固酮、18-氧皮质醇、18-羟皮质醇、类固醇概率评分、肾素和 ARR 的影响:结果:受体操作特征曲线显示,干扰性降压药物对 ARR 诊断性能的影响很大,而对类固醇概率评分的影响很小。矿质皮质激素受体拮抗剂会增加无 PA 患者的血浆醛固酮、18-氧皮质醇和 18-羟皮质醇,导致类固醇概率评分出现假阳性检测结果,ARR 出现假阴性结果。利尿剂会增加无 PA 患者的醛固酮、18-羟皮质醇和类固醇概率评分,而血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂会降低醛固酮、类固醇概率评分和 ARR。β肾上腺素受体阻滞剂、二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂对矿物质皮质激素和类固醇概率评分的影响微乎其微:在影响血浆醛固酮、18-氧皮质醇和 18-羟皮质醇的降压药中,矿质皮质激素受体拮抗剂是导致类固醇概率评分出现假阳性结果的主要原因。其他降压药的影响很小或没有影响,当这些药物不能停用时,类固醇概率评分比 ARR 更有优势:URL: https://drks.de/; 唯一标识符:DRKS00017084。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension
Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1006
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hypertension presents top-tier articles on high blood pressure in each monthly release. These articles delve into basic science, clinical treatment, and prevention of hypertension and associated cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal conditions. Renowned for their lasting significance, these papers contribute to advancing our understanding and management of hypertension-related issues.
期刊最新文献
Brief Review and Primer of Key Terminology for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Hypertension. Transforming Hypertension Diagnosis and Management in The Era of Artificial Intelligence: A 2023 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Workshop Report. To Harmonize or to Hinder … Do We Need 2 Sets of European Hypertension Guidelines in 2024? What Is New in the ESC Hypertension Guideline? Increased TRPV4 Channel Expression Enhances and Impairs Blood Vessel Function in Hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1