Benefit assessment of novel systemic therapies for bone and soft tissue sarcomas: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Japanese journal of clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1093/jjco/hyae102
Qiang He, Zhen Wang, Jie Mei, Chengxin Xie, Xin Sun
{"title":"Benefit assessment of novel systemic therapies for bone and soft tissue sarcomas: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Qiang He, Zhen Wang, Jie Mei, Chengxin Xie, Xin Sun","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyae102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone and soft tissue sarcomas are rare malignancies, and their heterogeneity has limited the development of novel drugs. This study aimed to apply two validated tools to evaluate the clinical benefits of novel drug therapies for sarcoma developed over the last decade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of systemic therapies for sarcomas published between 2013 and 2023. Each trial was scored according to the European Society of Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology-Value Framework version 2 (ASCO-VF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 52 RCTs in this study, of which 17 (32.7%) reported positive results that favored the experimental arm. The ESMO-MCBS grades were determined in 14/17 positive trials, and three of them (21.4%) met the threshold for meaningful clinical benefit. Likewise, ASCO-VF scores were calculated for 11/17 positive trials, and three of them (27.3%) met the threshold for meaningful clinical benefit. Weak correlation (r = 0.38, P = 0.277) and agreement (κ = 0.211, P = 0.490) were observed between the two frameworks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only a few RCTs with positive results have demonstrated substantial patient benefits for bone and soft tissue sarcomas over the past decade.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1272-1280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyae102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bone and soft tissue sarcomas are rare malignancies, and their heterogeneity has limited the development of novel drugs. This study aimed to apply two validated tools to evaluate the clinical benefits of novel drug therapies for sarcoma developed over the last decade.

Methods: The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of systemic therapies for sarcomas published between 2013 and 2023. Each trial was scored according to the European Society of Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology-Value Framework version 2 (ASCO-VF).

Results: We included 52 RCTs in this study, of which 17 (32.7%) reported positive results that favored the experimental arm. The ESMO-MCBS grades were determined in 14/17 positive trials, and three of them (21.4%) met the threshold for meaningful clinical benefit. Likewise, ASCO-VF scores were calculated for 11/17 positive trials, and three of them (27.3%) met the threshold for meaningful clinical benefit. Weak correlation (r = 0.38, P = 0.277) and agreement (κ = 0.211, P = 0.490) were observed between the two frameworks.

Conclusion: Only a few RCTs with positive results have demonstrated substantial patient benefits for bone and soft tissue sarcomas over the past decade.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨与软组织肉瘤新型系统疗法的效益评估:横断面研究。
背景:骨与软组织肉瘤是罕见的恶性肿瘤,其异质性限制了新型药物的开发。本研究旨在应用两种经过验证的工具来评估过去十年间开发的新型肉瘤药物疗法的临床疗效:方法:在PubMed和Embase数据库中检索2013年至2023年间发表的肉瘤系统疗法随机对照试验(RCT)。根据欧洲肿瘤内科学会临床获益量表 1.1 版(ESMO-MCBS)和美国临床肿瘤学会价值框架 2 版(ASCO-VF)对每项试验进行评分:本研究共纳入了 52 项 RCT,其中 17 项(32.7%)报告了有利于实验组的阳性结果。在 14/17 项阳性试验中确定了 ESMO-MCBS 分级,其中 3 项(21.4%)达到了有意义临床获益的阈值。同样,对11/17项阳性试验计算了ASCO-VF评分,其中3项(27.3%)达到了有意义临床获益的阈值。两个框架之间的相关性(r = 0.38,P = 0.277)和一致性(κ = 0.211,P = 0.490)较弱:结论:在过去的十年中,只有少数具有积极结果的 RCT 证明骨和软组织肉瘤对患者有实质性的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region. JJCO publishes various articles types including: ・Original Articles ・Case Reports ・Clinical Trial Notes ・Cancer Genetics Reports ・Epidemiology Notes ・Technical Notes ・Short Communications ・Letters to the Editors ・Solicited Reviews
期刊最新文献
Cabozantinib for brain metastases in renal cell carcinoma: a single-institution retrospective analysis. Diagnosis, clinical characteristics, and treatment of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma. Clinicopathological background of local recurrence in high grade sarcoma of the extremity with preoperative chemotherapy: a supplementary analysis of JCOG0304. Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in radiological ground-glass opacity of non-small cell lung cancer. A randomized phase III study evaluating dexamethasone-based mouthwash to prevent chemotherapy-induced stomatitis in patients with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1