Knowledge, Practice and Factors associated with Utilization of Cervical Cancer Screening Services.

Nancy Bhattarai, Siddhi Laxmi Bajracharya
{"title":"Knowledge, Practice and Factors associated with Utilization of Cervical Cancer Screening Services.","authors":"Nancy Bhattarai, Siddhi Laxmi Bajracharya","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.4896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer is treatable with regular screening and follow-up practices. The utilization of cervical cancer utilization services is found to be unsatisfactory in the context of Nepal. The objective of this study was to assess the factors that influence knowledge, practice, and utilization of cervical cancer screening among women in the Dhulikhel Municipality, Nepal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 156 married women residing in Dhulikhel Municipality. The study participants were selected using the convenience sampling method. A standard questionnaire was used to collect the information. This study examined socio-demograhic data, knowledge, practice, and factors associated with cervical cancer screening. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only one-fifth (17.9%) of the participants had received a cervical cancer screening. Most participants possessed a sufficient level, 134 out of 85.9%, of information about cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening. Annual healthcare visits (p=0.00), participant knowledge (p=0.014), and perceived barriers (p=0.001) were statistically significant factors in the uptake of cervical cancer screening. Out of those who felt they were highly susceptible, just one-fourth, or 25%, had undergone cervical cancer screening services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The number of medical visits, participants' knowledge, and perceived barriers had a significant impact on the uptake of cervical cancer screening. However, there was not found any relationship between the use of cervical cancer screening and perceived susceptibility and other socio-demographic factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":"22 1","pages":"34-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.4896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is treatable with regular screening and follow-up practices. The utilization of cervical cancer utilization services is found to be unsatisfactory in the context of Nepal. The objective of this study was to assess the factors that influence knowledge, practice, and utilization of cervical cancer screening among women in the Dhulikhel Municipality, Nepal.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 156 married women residing in Dhulikhel Municipality. The study participants were selected using the convenience sampling method. A standard questionnaire was used to collect the information. This study examined socio-demograhic data, knowledge, practice, and factors associated with cervical cancer screening. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data.

Results: Only one-fifth (17.9%) of the participants had received a cervical cancer screening. Most participants possessed a sufficient level, 134 out of 85.9%, of information about cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening. Annual healthcare visits (p=0.00), participant knowledge (p=0.014), and perceived barriers (p=0.001) were statistically significant factors in the uptake of cervical cancer screening. Out of those who felt they were highly susceptible, just one-fourth, or 25%, had undergone cervical cancer screening services.

Conclusions: The number of medical visits, participants' knowledge, and perceived barriers had a significant impact on the uptake of cervical cancer screening. However, there was not found any relationship between the use of cervical cancer screening and perceived susceptibility and other socio-demographic factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫颈癌筛查服务的相关知识、实践和因素。
背景:宫颈癌是可以通过定期筛查和随访治疗的。在尼泊尔,宫颈癌筛查服务的利用率并不令人满意。本研究旨在评估影响尼泊尔 Dhulikhel 市妇女对宫颈癌筛查的了解、实践和利用的因素:本研究对居住在 Dhulikhel 市的 156 名已婚妇女进行了横断面研究。研究对象采用方便抽样法选出。采用标准问卷收集信息。本研究调查了与宫颈癌筛查相关的社会人口数据、知识、实践和因素。数据分析采用了描述性和推论性统计方法:只有五分之一(17.9%)的参与者接受过宫颈癌筛查。大多数参与者对宫颈癌和宫颈癌筛查有足够的了解,在 85.9% 的参与者中有 134 人。每年的保健访问(p=0.00)、参与者的知识(p=0.014)和感知到的障碍(p=0.001)是影响接受宫颈癌筛查的重要统计因素。在那些认为自己极易患宫颈癌的人中,只有四分之一,即 25% 接受了宫颈癌筛查服务:结论:就诊次数、参与者的知识水平和感知到的障碍对接受宫颈癌筛查有重要影响。然而,没有发现宫颈癌筛查的使用与感知易感性和其他社会人口因素之间有任何关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Profile of Peripheral Artery Disease of Patients Attending Shahid Gangalal National Heart Center, Janakpurdham, Nepal. Clinical Profile of posterior segment in high Myopia. Clinical Profile of Thoracoscopic Bullectomy in Treatment of Pneumothorax. Comparison of Lintula Score with Modified Alvarado Score for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Adults. Comparison of Recovery Rate of Otomycosis using One-Percent Gentian Violet and One-Percent Clotrimazole Topical Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1