Establishing Consensus for Mohs Micrographic Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Melanoma in Situ for Future Clinical Trials: A Modified Delphi Study.

IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2024.7036
Kristen K Curtis, Nathan J Fakult, Jennifer L Strunck, Sumaira Z Aasi, Christine S Ahn, Murad Alam, Anna A Bar, Ramona Behshad, Christopher K Bichakjian, Diana Bolotin, Susan L Boone, Jeremy S Bordeaux, Jerry D Brewer, David R Carr, John A Carucci, Jason R Castillo, Sean R Christensen, Melanie A Clark, Lindsey K Collins, Addison M Demer, Daniel B Eisen, Hao Feng, Bahar F Firoz, Roy C Grekin, Jason M Hirshburg, Todd E Holmes, Conway C Huang, Thomas A Jennings, Shang I Brian Jiang, Sailesh Konda, Justin J Leitenberger, Jesse M Lewin, Ian A Maher, Elise Ng, Ida F Orengo, Faramarz H Samie, Drew K Saylor, Victoria Rose Sharon, Teo Soleymani, Susan M Swetter, Jesalyn A Tate, Marta J Van Beek, Nahid Y Vidal, Alok Vij, Ashley Wysong, Yaohui Gloria Xu, Bryan T Carroll, Wesley Y Yu
{"title":"Establishing Consensus for Mohs Micrographic Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Melanoma in Situ for Future Clinical Trials: A Modified Delphi Study.","authors":"Kristen K Curtis, Nathan J Fakult, Jennifer L Strunck, Sumaira Z Aasi, Christine S Ahn, Murad Alam, Anna A Bar, Ramona Behshad, Christopher K Bichakjian, Diana Bolotin, Susan L Boone, Jeremy S Bordeaux, Jerry D Brewer, David R Carr, John A Carucci, Jason R Castillo, Sean R Christensen, Melanie A Clark, Lindsey K Collins, Addison M Demer, Daniel B Eisen, Hao Feng, Bahar F Firoz, Roy C Grekin, Jason M Hirshburg, Todd E Holmes, Conway C Huang, Thomas A Jennings, Shang I Brian Jiang, Sailesh Konda, Justin J Leitenberger, Jesse M Lewin, Ian A Maher, Elise Ng, Ida F Orengo, Faramarz H Samie, Drew K Saylor, Victoria Rose Sharon, Teo Soleymani, Susan M Swetter, Jesalyn A Tate, Marta J Van Beek, Nahid Y Vidal, Alok Vij, Ashley Wysong, Yaohui Gloria Xu, Bryan T Carroll, Wesley Y Yu","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a promising treatment modality for melanoma in situ (MIS). However, variations in surgical technique limit the generalizability of existing data and may impede future study of MMS in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi method was selected to establish consensus on optimal MMS techniques for treating MIS in future clinical trials. The Delphi method was selected due to the limited current data, the wide range of techniques used in the field, and the intention to establish a standardized technique for future clinical trials. A literature review and interviews with experienced MMS surgeons were performed to identify dimensions of the MMS technique for MIS that (1) likely impacted costs or outcomes of the procedure, and (2) showed significant variability between surgeons. A total of 8 dimensions of technical variation were selected. The Delphi process consisted of 2 rounds of voting and commentary, during which 44 expert Mohs surgeons across the United States rated their agreement with specific recommendations using a Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five of eight recommendations achieved consensus in Round 1. All 3 of the remaining recommendations achieved consensus in Round 2. Techniques achieving consensus in Round 1 included the use of a starting peripheral margin of ≤5 mm, application of immunohistochemistry, frozen tissue processing, and resecting to the depth of subcutaneous fat. Consensus on the use of Wood's lamp, dermatoscope, and negative tissue controls was established in Round 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study generated 8 consensus recommendations intended to offer guidance for Mohs surgeons treating MIS. The adoption of these recommendations will promote standardization to facilitate comparisons of aggregate data in multicenter clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a promising treatment modality for melanoma in situ (MIS). However, variations in surgical technique limit the generalizability of existing data and may impede future study of MMS in clinical trials.

Methods: A modified Delphi method was selected to establish consensus on optimal MMS techniques for treating MIS in future clinical trials. The Delphi method was selected due to the limited current data, the wide range of techniques used in the field, and the intention to establish a standardized technique for future clinical trials. A literature review and interviews with experienced MMS surgeons were performed to identify dimensions of the MMS technique for MIS that (1) likely impacted costs or outcomes of the procedure, and (2) showed significant variability between surgeons. A total of 8 dimensions of technical variation were selected. The Delphi process consisted of 2 rounds of voting and commentary, during which 44 expert Mohs surgeons across the United States rated their agreement with specific recommendations using a Likert scale.

Results: Five of eight recommendations achieved consensus in Round 1. All 3 of the remaining recommendations achieved consensus in Round 2. Techniques achieving consensus in Round 1 included the use of a starting peripheral margin of ≤5 mm, application of immunohistochemistry, frozen tissue processing, and resecting to the depth of subcutaneous fat. Consensus on the use of Wood's lamp, dermatoscope, and negative tissue controls was established in Round 2.

Conclusions: This study generated 8 consensus recommendations intended to offer guidance for Mohs surgeons treating MIS. The adoption of these recommendations will promote standardization to facilitate comparisons of aggregate data in multicenter clinical trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立莫氏显微外科技术治疗原位黑色素瘤的共识,以利于未来的临床试验:改良德尔菲研究。
背景:莫氏显微放射手术(MMS)是治疗原位黑色素瘤(MIS)的一种很有前景的方法。然而,手术技术的差异限制了现有数据的可推广性,并可能妨碍今后在临床试验中对 MMS 进行研究:方法:我们选择了一种改良德尔菲法,以便在未来的临床试验中就治疗 MIS 的最佳 MMS 技术达成共识。之所以选择德尔菲法,是因为目前的数据有限,该领域使用的技术种类繁多,而且有意为未来的临床试验建立标准化技术。通过文献综述和对经验丰富的 MMS 外科医生的访谈,我们确定了 MIS 的 MMS 技术的以下方面:(1)可能影响手术成本或疗效;(2)外科医生之间存在显著差异。总共选出了 8 个技术差异维度。德尔菲过程包括两轮投票和评议,在此期间,全美 44 名莫氏外科专家使用李克特量表对他们是否同意具体建议进行评分:结果:8 项建议中有 5 项在第一轮达成共识,其余 3 项在第二轮达成共识。在第一轮中达成共识的技术包括使用≤5 mm的起始周边边缘、应用免疫组化、冷冻组织处理和切除至皮下脂肪深度。在第二轮中,就伍德灯、皮肤镜和阴性组织对照的使用达成了共识:本研究提出了 8 项共识建议,旨在为莫氏外科医生治疗 MIS 提供指导。采用这些建议将促进标准化,以便于在多中心临床试验中对综合数据进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care. Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship. JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.
期刊最新文献
Proportion of Gleason Score ≥8 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy and Tumor Aggressiveness in Matched Cohorts of East Asian and Non-East Asian Men. Local Recurrence and Survival in Patients With Melanoma >2 mm in Thickness at Difficult Sites Treated With 1-cm Versus 2-cm Margins. Oncology Survivorship Care Clinics: Design and Implementation of Survivorship Care Delivery Systems at NCCN Member Institutions. Achieving Adherence With NCCN Guidelines for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Regarding Peripheral and Deep En Face Margin Assessment (PDEMA). Authors' Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Wu Re: Enhancing the Readability of Online Patient-Facing Content Using AI Chatbots.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1