Patient experiences of muscle biopsy in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a cross-sectional survey.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Rheumatology International Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1007/s00296-024-05668-4
Benjamin Sutu, Samuel Maxwell, Shereen Oon, Laura Ross, Jessica Day
{"title":"Patient experiences of muscle biopsy in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Benjamin Sutu, Samuel Maxwell, Shereen Oon, Laura Ross, Jessica Day","doi":"10.1007/s00296-024-05668-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Muscle biopsy plays an important role in the diagnostic evaluation of individuals with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). However, variability in biopsy practices may result in a heterogenous patient experience. The existing literature offers limited insights into the experiences and perspectives of patients undergoing muscle biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a 27-item online survey to comprehensively characterise the experience of muscle biopsy among Australian patients, including their concerns, beliefs about procedure utility, information sources, physical sensations, perceived complications and recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 Australian individuals who reported a diagnosis of IIM completed the survey, with data collected from March to June 2023. Most participants had inclusion body myositis (76/111, 68.5%) and had undergone one biopsy procedure (87/111, 78.4%) as part of their IIM work-up. Nine of the 111 respondents did not undergo a muscle biopsy. The procedure was well-tolerated by many respondents, however, a notable number of respondents experienced post-procedural pain lasting > 72 h (27/102, 26.5%), increasing weakness post-biopsy (13.7%), numbness at the biopsy site (18/102, 17.6%) and a recovery time beyond 3 days (36/102, 35.3%). A substantial minority (30/111, 27%) felt they were inadequately informed about the risks and benefits of the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey highlights that although muscle biopsy is often well-tolerated, there are considerable patient concerns that are often inadequately addressed. Our findings underscore the need for improved patient-doctor communication and support throughout the biopsy process.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":" ","pages":"2129-2137"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11393206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-024-05668-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Muscle biopsy plays an important role in the diagnostic evaluation of individuals with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). However, variability in biopsy practices may result in a heterogenous patient experience. The existing literature offers limited insights into the experiences and perspectives of patients undergoing muscle biopsy.

Methods: This study employed a 27-item online survey to comprehensively characterise the experience of muscle biopsy among Australian patients, including their concerns, beliefs about procedure utility, information sources, physical sensations, perceived complications and recovery.

Results: A total of 111 Australian individuals who reported a diagnosis of IIM completed the survey, with data collected from March to June 2023. Most participants had inclusion body myositis (76/111, 68.5%) and had undergone one biopsy procedure (87/111, 78.4%) as part of their IIM work-up. Nine of the 111 respondents did not undergo a muscle biopsy. The procedure was well-tolerated by many respondents, however, a notable number of respondents experienced post-procedural pain lasting > 72 h (27/102, 26.5%), increasing weakness post-biopsy (13.7%), numbness at the biopsy site (18/102, 17.6%) and a recovery time beyond 3 days (36/102, 35.3%). A substantial minority (30/111, 27%) felt they were inadequately informed about the risks and benefits of the procedure.

Conclusions: This survey highlights that although muscle biopsy is often well-tolerated, there are considerable patient concerns that are often inadequately addressed. Our findings underscore the need for improved patient-doctor communication and support throughout the biopsy process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特发性炎症性肌病患者接受肌肉活检的经历:一项横断面调查。
简介:肌肉活检在疑似特发性炎症性肌病(IIM)患者的诊断评估中发挥着重要作用。然而,活检方法的多样性可能会导致患者体验的差异。现有文献对接受肌肉活检的患者的经历和观点提供的见解有限:本研究采用了一项包含 27 个项目的在线调查,以全面了解澳大利亚患者的肌肉活检经历,包括他们的顾虑、对手术效用的看法、信息来源、身体感觉、感知到的并发症和恢复情况:共有111名确诊为IIM的澳大利亚人完成了调查,数据收集时间为2023年3月至6月。大多数受访者患有包涵体肌炎(76/111,68.5%),并接受了一次活组织检查(87/111,78.4%),作为其IIM检查的一部分。111 名受访者中有 9 人未接受肌肉活检。许多受访者对手术的耐受性良好,但也有相当多的受访者在手术后出现疼痛,持续时间超过 72 小时(27/102,26.5%),活检后越来越虚弱(13.7%),活检部位麻木(18/102,17.6%),恢复时间超过 3 天(36/102,35.3%)。相当一部分人(30/111,27%)认为他们没有充分了解手术的风险和益处:这项调查突出表明,虽然肌肉活检通常能得到很好的耐受性,但患者仍有很多顾虑,而这些顾虑往往没有得到充分解决。我们的调查结果表明,在整个活检过程中,需要加强患者与医生之间的沟通和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology International
Rheumatology International 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
16. months
期刊介绍: RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
期刊最新文献
Acknowledgement to referees. Séraphin (1747-1800), "the facetious hunchback": How ankylosing spondylitis contributed to the success of his shadow puppet theatre. A comparison of comorbidities and their risk factors prevalence across rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis with focus on cardiovascular diseases: data from a single center real-world cohort. COVID-19 vaccination-related delayed adverse events among people with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the international COVAD survey. Uncovering the alterations in extrinsic foot muscle mechanical properties and foot posture in fibromyalgia: a case-control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1