Programa de estimulación cognitiva en línea para pacientes adultos mayores con deterioro cognitivo leve: estudio de factibilidad

Ana Shizue Aoki Morantte , Martha Valeria Medina-Rivera , Humberto Nicolini
{"title":"Programa de estimulación cognitiva en línea para pacientes adultos mayores con deterioro cognitivo leve: estudio de factibilidad","authors":"Ana Shizue Aoki Morantte ,&nbsp;Martha Valeria Medina-Rivera ,&nbsp;Humberto Nicolini","doi":"10.1016/j.regg.2024.101526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is considered a decline in cognitive functions, which becomes more pronounced with age. These patients may benefit from cognitive treatments that help attenuate or slow down a potential progression towards dementia.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the feasibility, fidelity, satisfaction, and effectiveness of the Memory Training and Cognitive Stimulation Program (PEMEC, by its Spanish acronym) in individuals with MCI in an online setting.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A non-probabilistic convenience sample of 14 patients with MCI received the PEMEC (PEMEC online) through an electronic device, were assessed with MoCA, NEUROPSI Brief, Yesavage Geriatric Depression Scale before and after treatment, comparing these measurements with those of a waiting list control group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>92,85% completed the treatment; with an average of 92% fidelity to the original intervention, an average of 91,61% for satisfaction with the activities of each session and the perceived usefulness was 97,98%. Statistically significant differences were found in the NEUROPSI Brief and the MoCA, before and after treatment in the intervention group and, when comparing the scores with the waiting list control group, a statistically significant difference was found in the MoCA scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Following the cultural adaptation of the program (from a Spanish to a Mexican treatment group), these results establish a precedent that systematic group cognitive interventions are feasible and effective in virtual tele-neuropsychology contexts for older adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39958,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia","volume":"59 6","pages":"Article 101526"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211139X2400060X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is considered a decline in cognitive functions, which becomes more pronounced with age. These patients may benefit from cognitive treatments that help attenuate or slow down a potential progression towards dementia.

Objective

To assess the feasibility, fidelity, satisfaction, and effectiveness of the Memory Training and Cognitive Stimulation Program (PEMEC, by its Spanish acronym) in individuals with MCI in an online setting.

Method

A non-probabilistic convenience sample of 14 patients with MCI received the PEMEC (PEMEC online) through an electronic device, were assessed with MoCA, NEUROPSI Brief, Yesavage Geriatric Depression Scale before and after treatment, comparing these measurements with those of a waiting list control group.

Results

92,85% completed the treatment; with an average of 92% fidelity to the original intervention, an average of 91,61% for satisfaction with the activities of each session and the perceived usefulness was 97,98%. Statistically significant differences were found in the NEUROPSI Brief and the MoCA, before and after treatment in the intervention group and, when comparing the scores with the waiting list control group, a statistically significant difference was found in the MoCA scores.

Conclusion

Following the cultural adaptation of the program (from a Spanish to a Mexican treatment group), these results establish a precedent that systematic group cognitive interventions are feasible and effective in virtual tele-neuropsychology contexts for older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[针对轻度认知障碍(MCI)老年人的在线认知刺激计划:可行性研究]。
背景:轻度认知功能障碍(MCI)被认为是认知功能的衰退,随着年龄的增长而变得更加明显。这些患者可能会从认知治疗中受益,因为认知治疗有助于减轻或延缓痴呆症的潜在进展:评估记忆训练和认知刺激计划(西班牙语缩写为 PEMEC)在在线环境下对 MCI 患者的可行性、忠实度、满意度和有效性:14名MCI患者通过电子设备接受了PEMEC(在线PEMEC),在治疗前后接受了MoCA、NEUROPSI Brief、Yesavage老年抑郁量表的评估,并将这些测量结果与候补对照组的测量结果进行了比较:92.85%的受试者完成了治疗;平均92%的受试者忠实于最初的干预措施,平均91.61%的受试者对每次治疗活动感到满意,97.98%的受试者认为治疗有用。在干预组治疗前后,NEUROPSI Brief 和 MoCA 在统计上有明显差异;在与候补对照组的分数比较时,发现 MoCA 分数在统计上有明显差异:这些结果开创了一个先例,即在针对老年人的虚拟远程神经心理学环境中,进行系统的团体认知干预是可行且有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia
Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
85 days
期刊介绍: Una revista de gran prestigio por sus artículos originales de investigación y revisiones. Permite cubrir todas las áreas de la medicina pero siempre desde la atención al paciente anciano, y está presente en los más reconocidos índices internacionales.
期刊最新文献
Manejo multidisciplinar de un caso severo de pioderma gangrenoso en una paciente de edad avanzada Diagnóstico diferencial del síncope en el paciente mayor, a raíz de un caso clínico Invaginación duodenal en paciente octogenario: a propósito de un caso Translating lessons from immortal models: Hydra and the immortal jellyfish La geriatría dentro del sistema sanitario español: pasado y futuro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1