Efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of second-generation antipsychotics for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

0 PSYCHIATRY BMJ mental health Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1136/bmjment-2024-301019
Wenqi Lü, Fangzhou Liu, Yuwei Zhang, Xiance He, Yongbo Hu, Huifang Xu, Xin Yang, Jin Li, Weihong Kuang
{"title":"Efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of second-generation antipsychotics for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Wenqi Lü, Fangzhou Liu, Yuwei Zhang, Xiance He, Yongbo Hu, Huifang Xu, Xin Yang, Jin Li, Weihong Kuang","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2024-301019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are highly prevalent in people living with dementia. Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are commonly used to treat BPSD, but their comparative efficacy and acceptability are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The standard mean difference (SMD) was used to pool the fixed effects of continuous outcomes. We calculated ORs with corresponding 95% credible intervals (CI) for the categorical variable. Efficacy was defined as the scores improved on the standardised scales. Acceptability was defined as the all-cause dropout rate. Tolerability was defined as the discontinuation rate due to adverse effects (AEs). The relative treatment rankings were reported with the surface under the cumulative curve. The AE outcomes included mortality, cerebrovascular adverse events (CVAEs), falls, sedation, extrapyramidal symptoms and urinary symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty randomised controlled trials with a total of 6374 individuals containing 5 types of SGAs (quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone, brexpiprazole and aripiprazole) with intervention lengths ranging from 6 weeks to 36 weeks were included in this network meta-analysis. For the efficacy outcome, compared with the placebo, brexpiprazole (SMD=-1.77, 95% CI -2.80 to -0.74) was more efficacious, and brexpiprazole was better than quetiapine, olanzapine and aripiprazole. Regarding acceptability, only aripiprazole (OR=0.72, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.96) was better than the placebo, and aripiprazole was also better than brexpiprazole (OR=0.61, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.99). In terms of tolerability, olanzapine was worse than placebo (OR=6.02, 95% CI 2.87 to 12.66), risperidone (OR=3.67, 95% CI 1.66 to 8.11) and quetiapine (OR=3.71, 95% CI 1.46 to 9.42), while aripiprazole was better than olanzapine (OR=0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.78). Quetiapine presented good safety in CVAE. Brexpiprazole has better safety in terms of falls and showed related safety in sedation among included SGAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Brexpiprazole showing great efficacy in the treatment of BPSD, with aripiprazole showing the highest acceptability and olanzapine showing the worst tolerability. The results of this study may be used to guide decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are highly prevalent in people living with dementia. Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are commonly used to treat BPSD, but their comparative efficacy and acceptability are unknown.

Methods: The standard mean difference (SMD) was used to pool the fixed effects of continuous outcomes. We calculated ORs with corresponding 95% credible intervals (CI) for the categorical variable. Efficacy was defined as the scores improved on the standardised scales. Acceptability was defined as the all-cause dropout rate. Tolerability was defined as the discontinuation rate due to adverse effects (AEs). The relative treatment rankings were reported with the surface under the cumulative curve. The AE outcomes included mortality, cerebrovascular adverse events (CVAEs), falls, sedation, extrapyramidal symptoms and urinary symptoms.

Results: Twenty randomised controlled trials with a total of 6374 individuals containing 5 types of SGAs (quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone, brexpiprazole and aripiprazole) with intervention lengths ranging from 6 weeks to 36 weeks were included in this network meta-analysis. For the efficacy outcome, compared with the placebo, brexpiprazole (SMD=-1.77, 95% CI -2.80 to -0.74) was more efficacious, and brexpiprazole was better than quetiapine, olanzapine and aripiprazole. Regarding acceptability, only aripiprazole (OR=0.72, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.96) was better than the placebo, and aripiprazole was also better than brexpiprazole (OR=0.61, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.99). In terms of tolerability, olanzapine was worse than placebo (OR=6.02, 95% CI 2.87 to 12.66), risperidone (OR=3.67, 95% CI 1.66 to 8.11) and quetiapine (OR=3.71, 95% CI 1.46 to 9.42), while aripiprazole was better than olanzapine (OR=0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.78). Quetiapine presented good safety in CVAE. Brexpiprazole has better safety in terms of falls and showed related safety in sedation among included SGAs.

Conclusion: Brexpiprazole showing great efficacy in the treatment of BPSD, with aripiprazole showing the highest acceptability and olanzapine showing the worst tolerability. The results of this study may be used to guide decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第二代抗精神病药物治疗痴呆症行为和心理症状的疗效、可接受性和耐受性:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景:痴呆症的行为和心理症状(BPSD)在痴呆症患者中非常普遍。第二代抗精神病药物(SGAs)常用于治疗BPSD,但其疗效和可接受性尚不清楚:方法:我们使用标准平均差(SMD)来汇集连续结果的固定效应。我们计算了分类变量的ORs及相应的95%可信区间(CI)。疗效定义为标准化量表的评分提高。可接受性定义为全因辍学率。耐受性定义为因不良反应(AEs)导致的停药率。相对治疗排名以累积曲线下的表面值进行报告。不良反应结果包括死亡率、脑血管不良事件(CVAEs)、跌倒、镇静、锥体外系症状和泌尿系统症状:本网络荟萃分析共纳入了20项随机对照试验,涉及6374人,包含5种SGA(喹硫平、奥氮平、利培酮、布来哌唑和阿立哌唑),干预时间从6周到36周不等。在疗效方面,与安慰剂相比,布来哌唑(SMD=-1.77,95% CI -2.80至-0.74)的疗效更好,布来哌唑优于喹硫平、奥氮平和阿立哌唑。在可接受性方面,只有阿立哌唑(OR=0.72,95% CI 0.54 至 0.96)优于安慰剂,阿立哌唑也优于布来哌唑(OR=0.61,95% CI 0.37 至 0.99)。在耐受性方面,奥氮平差于安慰剂(OR=6.02,95% CI 2.87 至 12.66)、利培酮(OR=3.67,95% CI 1.66 至 8.11)和喹硫平(OR=3.71,95% CI 1.46 至 9.42),而阿立哌唑优于奥氮平(OR=0.25,95% CI 0.08 至 0.78)。喹硫平对CVAE具有良好的安全性。在所纳入的 SGAs 中,布雷哌唑在跌倒方面具有更好的安全性,在镇静方面也显示出相关的安全性:结论:布雷哌唑在治疗 BPSD 方面显示出很好的疗效,阿立哌唑的可接受性最高,奥氮平的耐受性最差。本研究的结果可用于指导决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in sleep patterns in people with a history of depression during the COVID-19 pandemic: a natural experiment. Mediation-adjusted multivariable Mendelian randomisation study identified novel metabolites related to mental health. Identifying postpartum depression: Using key risk factors for early detection. Using the South African Depression Scale (SADS) to measure depressive symptoms in a UK sample. Cumulative ADHD medication use and risk of type 2 diabetes in adults: a Swedish Register study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1