Differences in the Effects of Beta-Blockers Depending on Heart Rate at Discharge in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Atrial Fibrillation.

International journal of heart failure Pub Date : 2024-07-03 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.36628/ijhf.2023.0052
Young In Kim, Min-Soo Ahn, Byung-Su Yoo, Jang-Young Kim, Jung-Woo Son, Young Jun Park, Sung Hwa Kim, Dae Ryong Kang, Hae-Young Lee, Seok-Min Kang, Myeong-Chan Cho
{"title":"Differences in the Effects of Beta-Blockers Depending on Heart Rate at Discharge in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"Young In Kim, Min-Soo Ahn, Byung-Su Yoo, Jang-Young Kim, Jung-Woo Son, Young Jun Park, Sung Hwa Kim, Dae Ryong Kang, Hae-Young Lee, Seok-Min Kang, Myeong-Chan Cho","doi":"10.36628/ijhf.2023.0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Beta-blockers (BBs) improve prognosis in heart failure (HF), which is mediated by lowering heart rate (HR). However, HR has no prognostic implication in atrial fibrillation (AF) and also BBs have not been shown to improve prognosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with AF. This study assessed the prognostic implication of BB in HFpEF with AF according to discharge HR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the Korean Acute Heart Failure Registry, 687 patients with HFpEF and AF were selected. Study subjects were divided into 4 groups based on 75 beats per minute (bpm) of HR at discharge and whether or not they were treated with BB at discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 687 patients with HFpEF and AF, 128 (36.1%) were in low HR group and 121 (36.4%) were in high HR group among those treated with BB at discharge. In high HR group, HR at discharge was significantly faster in BB non-users (85.5±9.1 bpm vs. 89.2±12.5 bpm, p=0.005). In the Cox model, BB did not improve 60-day rehospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.35-2.47) or mortality (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.22-2.74) in low HR group. However, in high HR group, BB treatment at discharge was associated with 82% reduced 60-day HF rehospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.81), but not with mortality (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.20-2.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In HFpEF with AF, in patients with HR over 75 bpm at discharge, BB treatment at discharge was associated with a reduced 60-day rehospitalization rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":101410,"journal":{"name":"International journal of heart failure","volume":"6 3","pages":"119-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11284333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of heart failure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2023.0052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Beta-blockers (BBs) improve prognosis in heart failure (HF), which is mediated by lowering heart rate (HR). However, HR has no prognostic implication in atrial fibrillation (AF) and also BBs have not been shown to improve prognosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with AF. This study assessed the prognostic implication of BB in HFpEF with AF according to discharge HR.

Methods: From the Korean Acute Heart Failure Registry, 687 patients with HFpEF and AF were selected. Study subjects were divided into 4 groups based on 75 beats per minute (bpm) of HR at discharge and whether or not they were treated with BB at discharge.

Results: Of the 687 patients with HFpEF and AF, 128 (36.1%) were in low HR group and 121 (36.4%) were in high HR group among those treated with BB at discharge. In high HR group, HR at discharge was significantly faster in BB non-users (85.5±9.1 bpm vs. 89.2±12.5 bpm, p=0.005). In the Cox model, BB did not improve 60-day rehospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.35-2.47) or mortality (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.22-2.74) in low HR group. However, in high HR group, BB treatment at discharge was associated with 82% reduced 60-day HF rehospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.81), but not with mortality (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.20-2.98).

Conclusions: In HFpEF with AF, in patients with HR over 75 bpm at discharge, BB treatment at discharge was associated with a reduced 60-day rehospitalization rate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
射血分数保留型心力衰竭和心房颤动患者出院时心率不同,β-受体阻滞剂的效果也不同。
背景和目的:β-受体阻滞剂(BBs)通过降低心率(HR)改善心力衰竭(HF)的预后。然而,心率对心房颤动(AF)的预后没有影响,而且也没有证据表明β受体阻滞剂能改善射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)伴心房颤动患者的预后。本研究根据出院心率评估了BB对伴有房颤的高射血分数心力衰竭患者的预后影响:方法:从韩国急性心力衰竭登记处选取了 687 例 HFpEF 和房颤患者。研究对象根据出院时心率为 75 次/分(bpm)以及出院时是否接受 BB 治疗分为 4 组:结果:在 687 名高频心率衰竭和房颤患者中,出院时接受 BB 治疗的患者中有 128 人(36.1%)属于低心率组,121 人(36.4%)属于高心率组。在高心率组中,未使用 BB 的患者出院时心率明显更快(85.5±9.1 bpm vs. 89.2±12.5 bpm,P=0.005)。在 Cox 模型中,BB 并未改善低心率组的 60 天再住院率(危险比为 0.93;95% 置信区间 [95%CI],0.35-2.47)或死亡率(危险比为 0.77;95% CI,0.22-2.74)。然而,在高心率组中,出院时接受 BB 治疗可使 60 天的心房颤动再住院率降低 82%(危险比为 0.18;95% CI 为 0.04-0.81),但与死亡率无关(危险比为 0.77;95% CI 为 0.20-2.98):结论:对于合并房颤的高频心衰患者,出院时心率超过75 bpm的患者,出院时接受BB治疗可降低60天再住院率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adequacy of Ambulatory Hemodynamic Assessments for Reducing All-Cause Mortality in Individuals With Heart Failure. Prognostic Role of RVGLS/PASP Ratio, a New Echocardiographic Parameter of the Right Ventricle-Pulmonary Artery Coupling, in Patients With Acute Heart Failure. The Impact of the Novel Sodium-Dependent Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor, Enavogliflozin, on Cardiac Reverse Remodeling in Heart Failure Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Case Series. Current and Future of Heart Failure Care in Asia. Elevating Right Ventricular Assessment: The Transformative Prognostic Power of RVGLS/PASP Ratio in Acute Heart Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1